Exploring MSSM for charge and color breaking and other constraints in the context of Higgs@125 GeV

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Chattopadhyay, Utpal ^a   Dey, Abhishek ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry Phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84914706617     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2014)161     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. E.S. Abers and B.W. Lee, Gauge theories, Phys. Rept.9 (1973) 1 [INSPIRE].
2. Zbehavior of the O(α) corrections to semileptonic processes mediated by W, Nucl. Phys.B 196 (1982) 83 [INSPIRE].
3. T.P. Cheng and L.F. Li, Gauge theory of elementary particle physics, Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon, Oxford U.K. (1984).
4. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model, Phys. Rept.457 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503172] [INSPIRE].
5. H.P. Nilles, Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics, Phys. Rept.110 (1984) 1 [INSPIRE].
6. J.D. Lykken, Introduction to supersymmetry, hep-th/9612114 [INSPIRE].
7. nd ed., Princeton U.S.A. (1991).
8. M. Drees, P. Roy and R.M. Godbole, Theory and phenomenology of sparticles, World Scientific, Singapore (2005).
9. H. Baer and X. Tata, Weak scale supersymmetry: from superfields to scattering events, Cambridge Univ. Pr., Cambridge U.K. (2006).
10. D.J.H. Chung et al., The soft supersymmetry breaking Lagrangian: theory and applications, Phys. Rept.407 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0312378] [INSPIRE].
11. H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, The search for supersymmetry: probing physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Rept.117 (1985) 75 [INSPIRE].
12. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.21 (2010) 1 [hep-ph/9709356] [INSPIRE].
13. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept.459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].
14. J.A. Casas, A. Lleyda and C. Muñoz, Strong constraints on the parameter space of the MSSM from charge and color breaking minima, Nucl. Phys.B 471 (1996) 3 [hep-ph/9507294] [INSPIRE].
15. C. Le Mouel, Charge and color breaking conditions associated to the top quark Yukawa coupling, Phys. Rev.D 64 (2001) 075009 [hep-ph/0103341] [INSPIRE].
16. C. Le Mouel, Optimal charge and color breaking conditions in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys.B 607 (2001) 38 [hep-ph/0101351] [INSPIRE].
17. L. Álvarez-Gaumé, J. Polchinski and M.B. Wise, Minimal low-energy supergravity, Nucl. Phys.B 221 (1983) 495 [INSPIRE].
18. J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber and M. Sher, Charge/color breaking minima and a-parameter bounds in supersymmetric models, Nucl. Phys.B 306 (1988) 1 [INSPIRE].
19. A. Strumia, Charge and color breaking minima and constraints on the MSSM parameters, Nucl. Phys.B 482 (1996) 24 [hep-ph/9604417] [INSPIRE].
20. H. Baer, M. Brhlik and D. Castano, Constraints on the minimal supergravity model from nonstandard vacua, Phys. Rev.D 54 (1996) 6944 [hep-ph/9607465] [INSPIRE].
21. S.A. Abel and C.A. Savoy, Charge and color breaking constraints in the MSSM with nonuniversal SUSY breaking, Phys. Lett.B 444 (1998) 119 [hep-ph/9809498] [INSPIRE].
22. S. Abel and T. Falk, Charge and color breaking in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett.B 444 (1998) 427 [hep-ph/9810297] [INSPIRE].
23. P.M. Ferreira, One-loop charge and colour breaking associated with the top Yukawa coupling, hep-ph/0406234 [INSPIRE].
24. M. Brhlik, Charge and color breaking minima in supersymmetric models, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.101 (2001) 395 [INSPIRE].
25. P.M. Ferreira, A full one loop charge and color breaking effective potential, Phys. Lett.B 509 (2001) 120 [Erratum ibid.B 518 (2001) 333] [hep-ph/0008115] [INSPIRE].
26. A.J. Bordner, Parameter bounds in the supersymmetric standard model from charge/color breaking vacua, hep-ph/9506409 [INSPIRE].
27. D.G. Cerdeno, E. Gabrielli, M.E. Gomez and C. Muñoz, Neutralino nucleon cross-section and charge and color breaking constraints, JHEP06 (2003) 030 [hep-ph/0304115] [INSPIRE].
28. A. Riotto and E. Roulet, Vacuum decay along supersymmetric flat directions, Phys. Lett.B 377 (1996) 60 [hep-ph/9512401] [INSPIRE].
29. T. Falk, K.A. Olive, L. Roszkowski, A. Singh and M. Srednicki, Constraints from inflation and reheating on superpartner masses, Phys. Lett.B 396 (1997) 50 [hep-ph/9611325] [INSPIRE].
30. A. Kusenko, P. Langacker and G. Segre, Phase transitions and vacuum tunneling into charge and color breaking minima in the MSSM, Phys. Rev.D 54 (1996) 5824 [hep-ph/9602414] [INSPIRE].
31. A. Kusenko and P. Langacker, Is the vacuum stable?, Phys. Lett.B 391 (1997) 29 [hep-ph/9608340] [INSPIRE].
32. A. Kusenko, Color and charge breaking minima in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.52A (1997) 67 [hep-ph/9607287] [INSPIRE].
33. A. Kusenko, Improved action method for analyzing tunneling in quantum field theory, Phys. Lett.B 358 (1995) 51 [hep-ph/9504418] [INSPIRE].
34. R.H. Brandenberger, Quantum field theory methods and inflationary universe models, Rev. Mod. Phys.57 (1985) 1 [INSPIRE].
35. T. Cohen and J.G. Wacker, Here be dragons: the unexplored continents of the CMSSM, JHEP09 (2013) 061 [arXiv:1305.2914] [INSPIRE].
36. J.E. Camargo-Molina, B. O’Leary, W. Porod and F. Staub, Vevacious: a tool for finding the global minima of one-loop effective potentials with many scalars, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2588 [arXiv:1307.1477] [INSPIRE].
37. C.L. Wainwright, CosmoTransitions: computing cosmological phase transition temperatures and bubble profiles with multiple fields, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2006 [arXiv:1109.4189] [INSPIRE].
38. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
39. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
40. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions ats=7$$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$and 8 TeV, JHEP06 (2013) 081 [arXiv:1303.4571] [INSPIRE].
41. MSSM Working Group collaboration, A. Djouadi et al., The minimal supersymmetric standard model: group summary report, hep-ph/9901246 [INSPIRE].
42. J.E. Camargo-Molina, B. O’Leary, W. Porod and F. Staub, Stability of the CMSSM against sfermion VEVs, JHEP12 (2013) 103 [arXiv:1309.7212] [INSPIRE].
43. D. Chowdhury, R.M. Godbole, K.A. Mohan and S.K. Vempati, Charge and color breaking constraints in MSSM after the Higgs discovery at LHC, JHEP02 (2014) 110 [arXiv:1310.1932] [INSPIRE].
44. N. Blinov and D.E. Morrissey, Charge and color breaking constraints in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, arXiv:1309.7397 [INSPIRE].
45. J.E. Camargo-Molina, B. Garbrecht, B. O’Leary, W. Porod and F. Staub, Constraining the natural MSSM through tunneling to color-breaking vacua at zero and non-zero temperature, Phys. Lett.B 737 (2014) 156 [arXiv:1405.7376] [INSPIRE].
46. S.R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 1. Semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev.D 15 (1977) 2929 [Erratum ibid.D 16 (1977) 1248] [INSPIRE].
47. C.G. Callan Jr. and S.R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 2. First quantum corrections, Phys. Rev.D 16 (1977) 1762 [INSPIRE].
48. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept.267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
49. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
50. L. Bergstrom, Dark matter evidence, particle physics candidates and detection methods, Annalen Phys.524 (2012) 479 [arXiv:1205.4882] [INSPIRE].
51. K. Garrett and G. Duda, Dark matter: a primer, Adv. Astron.2011 (2011) 968283 [arXiv:1006.2483] [INSPIRE].
52. D.M. Pierce, J.A. Bagger, K.T. Matchev and R.-J. Zhang, Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys.B 491 (1997) 3 [hep-ph/9606211] [INSPIRE].
53. H. Komatsu, New constraints on parameters in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Lett.B 215 (1988) 323 [INSPIRE].
54. A. Datta, A. Kundu and A. Samanta, Yukawa unification and unstable minima of the supersymmetric scalar potential, Phys. Rev.D 63 (2001) 015008 [hep-ph/0007148] [INSPIRE].
55. A. Datta and A. Samanta, Effects of SO(10) D term on Yukawa unification and unstable minima of the supersymmetric scalar potential, J. Phys.G 29 (2003) 2721 [hep-ph/0108056] [INSPIRE].
56. A. Datta and A. Samanta, Electroweak precision data, light sleptons and stability of the SUSY scalar potential, Phys. Lett.B 526 (2002) 111 [hep-ph/0111222] [INSPIRE].
57. A. Datta and A. Samanta, LEP data and the stability of the potential confronts the mSUGRA model, Phys. Lett.B 607 (2005) 144 [hep-ph/0406129] [INSPIRE].
58. E. Gabrielli, K. Huitu and S. Roy, Vacuum stability bounds in anomaly and gaugino mediated SUSY breaking models, Phys. Rev.D 65 (2002) 075005 [hep-ph/0108246] [INSPIRE].
59. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, Constraints from charge and color breaking minima in the (M+1)SSM, Phys. Lett.B 457 (1999) 299 [hep-ph/9902401] [INSPIRE].
60. T. Kobayashi and T. Shimomura, Constraints from color and/or charge breaking minima in the νSSM, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 035008 [arXiv:1006.0062] [INSPIRE].
61. J. Hisano and S. Sugiyama, Charge-breaking constraints on left-right mixing of stau’s, Phys. Lett.B 696 (2011) 92 [Erratum ibid.B 719 (2013) 472] [arXiv:1011.0260] [INSPIRE].
62. M. Carena, S. Gori, I. Low, N.R. Shah and C.E.M. Wagner, Vacuum stability and Higgs diphoton decays in the MSSM, JHEP02 (2013) 114 [arXiv:1211.6136] [INSPIRE].
63. T. Kitahara and T. Yoshinaga, Stau with large mass difference and enhancement of the Higgs to diphoton decay rate in the MSSM, JHEP05 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.0461] [INSPIRE].
64. N. Sakai, Naturalness in supersymmetric guts, Z. Phys.C 11 (1981) 153 [INSPIRE].
65. R.K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories, Nucl. Phys.B 199 (1982) 36 [INSPIRE].
66. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys.B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].
67. B. de Carlos and J.A. Casas, One loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in supersymmetric models and the fine tuning problem, Phys. Lett.B 309 (1993) 320 [hep-ph/9303291] [INSPIRE].
68. K.L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev.D 58 (1998) 096004 [hep-ph/9710473] [INSPIRE].
69. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev.D 61 (2000) 075005 [hep-ph/9909334] [INSPIRE].
70. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Multi-TeV scalars are natural in minimal supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 2322 [hep-ph/9908309] [INSPIRE].
71. U. Chattopadhyay, A. Corsetti and P. Nath, WMAP constraints, SUSY dark matter and implications for the direct detection of SUSY, Phys. Rev.D 68 (2003) 035005 [hep-ph/0303201] [INSPIRE].
72. S. Akula, M. Liu, P. Nath and G. Peim, Naturalness, supersymmetry and implications for LHC and dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 709 (2012) 192 [arXiv:1111.4589] [INSPIRE].
73. J.L. Feng, Naturalness and the status of supersymmetry, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63 (2013) 351 [arXiv:1302.6587] [INSPIRE].
74. H. Baer, V. Barger, M. Padeffke-Kirkland and X. Tata, Naturalness implies intra-generational degeneracy for decoupled squarks and sleptons, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 037701 [arXiv:1311.4587] [INSPIRE].
75. H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Mickelson and M. Padeffke-Kirkland, SUSY models under siege: LHC constraints and electroweak fine-tuning, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115019 [arXiv:1404.2277] [INSPIRE].
76. A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, Supersymmetry, naturalness and light Higgsinos, Indian J. Phys.88 (2014) 991 [arXiv:1404.1386] [INSPIRE].
77. C. Boehm, P.S.B. Dev, A. Mazumdar and E. Pukartas, Naturalness of light neutralino dark matter in pMSSM after LHC, XENON100 and Planck data, JHEP06 (2013) 113 [arXiv:1303.5386] [INSPIRE].
78. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail and T.G. Rizzo, The Higgs sector and fine-tuning in the pMSSM, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 075015 [arXiv:1206.5800] [INSPIRE].
79. C.F. Berger, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett and T.G. Rizzo, Supersymmetry without prejudice, JHEP02 (2009) 023 [arXiv:0812.0980] [INSPIRE].
80. L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and A.J. Williams, What next for the CMSSM and the NUHM: improved prospects for superpartner and dark matter detection, JHEP08 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1405.4289] [INSPIRE].
81. M. Cahill-Rowley et al., Complementarity of dark matter searches in the pMSSM, arXiv:1405.6716 [INSPIRE].
82. M. Bobrowski, G. Chalons, W.G. Hollik and U. Nierste, Vacuum stability of the effective Higgs potential in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 035025 [arXiv:1407.2814] [INSPIRE].
83. G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich and G. Weiglein, Towards high precision predictions for the MSSM Higgs sector, Eur. Phys. J.C 28 (2003) 133 [hep-ph/0212020] [INSPIRE].
84. B.C. Allanach, A. Djouadi, J.L. Kneur, W. Porod and P. Slavich, Precise determination of the neutral Higgs boson masses in the MSSM, JHEP09 (2004) 044 [hep-ph/0406166] [INSPIRE].
85. S.P. Martin, Three-loop corrections to the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 055005 [hep-ph/0701051] [INSPIRE].
86. R.V. Harlander, P. Kant, L. Mihaila and M. Steinhauser, Higgs boson mass in supersymmetry to three loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 191602 [Erratum ibid.101 (2008) 039901] [arXiv:0803.0672] [INSPIRE].
87. S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs search results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett.B 710 (2012) 201 [arXiv:1112.3026] [INSPIRE].
88. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi and F. Mahmoudi, The Higgs sector of the phenomenological MSSM in the light of the Higgs boson discovery, JHEP09 (2012) 107 [arXiv:1207.1348] [INSPIRE].
89. S. Alekhin, A. Djouadi and S. Moch, The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 214 [arXiv:1207.0980] [INSPIRE].
90. M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay and R.M. Godbole, Implication of a Higgs boson at 125 GeV within the stochastic superspace framework, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 035022 [arXiv:1211.1549] [INSPIRE].
91. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, Y. Amhis et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ-lepton properties as of early 2012, arXiv:1207.1158 [INSPIRE].
92. −with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 101804 [arXiv:1307.5025] [INSPIRE].
93. −decays at the LHCb experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 101805 [arXiv:1307.5024] [INSPIRE].
94. −from the CMS and LHCb experiments, CMS-PAS-BPH-13-007, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
95. *γ in the MSSM, (version 3.3), Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 745 [arXiv:0710.2067] [INSPIRE].
96. A. Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur and G. Moultaka, SuSpect: a fortran code for the supersymmetric and Higgs particle spectrum in the MSSM, (version 2.43), Comput. Phys. Commun.176 (2007) 426 [hep-ph/0211331] [INSPIRE].
97. W. Altmannshofer, M. Carena, N.R. Shah and F. Yu, Indirect probes of the MSSM after the Higgs discovery, JHEP01 (2013) 160 [arXiv:1211.1976] [INSPIRE].
98. B. Bhattacherjee et al., Implications of the 98 GeV and 125 GeV Higgs scenarios in nondecoupling supersymmetry with updated ATLAS, CMS and PLANCK data, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 035011 [arXiv:1305.4020] [INSPIRE].
99. WMAP collaboration, G. Hinshaw et al., Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological parameter results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208 (2013) 19 [arXiv:1212.5226] [INSPIRE].
100. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.571 (2014) A16 [arXiv:1303.5076] [INSPIRE].
101. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos with the ATLAS detector in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum usings=8$$ \sqrt{s}=8 $$TeV proton-proton collision data, JHEP09 (2014) 176 [arXiv:1405.7875] [INSPIRE].
102. J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, Neutralino relic density including coannihilations, Phys. Rev.D 56 (1997) 1879 [hep-ph/9704361] [INSPIRE].
103. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: improved analysis, Nucl. Phys.B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
104. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
105. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun.176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059] [INSPIRE].
106. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0.7: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun.177 (2007) 894 [INSPIRE].
107. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].
108. G. Bélanger et al., Indirect search for dark matter with MicrOMEGAs 2.4, Comput. Phys. Commun.182 (2011) 842 [arXiv:1004.1092] [INSPIRE].
109. 3: a program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].
110. D. Pierce and A. Papadopoulos, Radiative corrections to neutralino and chargino masses in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 565 [hep-ph/9312248] [INSPIRE].
111. A.B. Lahanas, K. Tamvakis and N.D. Tracas, One loop corrections to the neutralino sector and radiative electroweak breaking in the MSSM, Phys. Lett.B 324 (1994) 387 [hep-ph/9312251] [INSPIRE].
112. A. Chatterjee, M. Drees and S. Kulkarni, Radiative corrections to the neutralino dark matter relic density — an effective coupling approach, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 105025 [arXiv:1209.2328] [INSPIRE].
113. P. Grothaus, M. Lindner and Y. Takanishi, Naturalness of neutralino dark matter, JHEP07 (2013) 094 [arXiv:1207.4434] [INSPIRE].
114. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M.M. Nojiri and O. Saito, Direct detection of the Wino and Higgsino-like neutralino dark matters at one-loop level, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 015007 [hep-ph/0407168] [INSPIRE].
115. H. Baer et al., Exploring the BWCA (Bino-Wino Co-Annihilation) scenario for neutralino dark matter, JHEP12 (2005) 011 [hep-ph/0511034] [INSPIRE].
116. XENON1T collaboration, E. Aprile, The XENON1T dark matter search experiment, Springer Proc. Phys.148 (2013) 93 [arXiv:1206.6288] [INSPIRE].
117. U. Haisch and F. Mahmoudi, MSSM: cornered and correlated, JHEP01 (2013) 061 [arXiv:1210.7806] [INSPIRE].
118. −and Higgs search limits, Phys. Rev.D 81 (2010) 117701 [arXiv:1003.0437] [INSPIRE].
119. −and SUSY at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 115011 [arXiv:1107.3535] [INSPIRE].
120. μ − 2, theb¯$$ \overline{b} $$ → s + γ constraint and nonuniversalities, Phys. Rev.D 65 (2002) 075009 [hep-ph/0110341] [INSPIRE].
121. N. Chen, D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, SUSY and Higgs signatures implied by cancellations in b → sγ, Phys. Lett.B 685 (2010) 174 [arXiv:0911.0217] [INSPIRE].
122. M.E. Gomez, T. Ibrahim, P. Nath and S. Skadhauge, An improved analysis of b → sγ in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 015015 [hep-ph/0601163] [INSPIRE].
123. F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, The muon g − 2, Phys. Rept.477 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0902.3360] [INSPIRE].
124. μin SU(5) × U(1) supergravity models, Phys. Rev.D 49 (1994) 366 [hep-ph/9308336] [INSPIRE].
125. U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Probing supergravity grand unification in the Brookhaven g − 2 experiment, Phys. Rev.D 53 (1996) 1648 [hep-ph/9507386] [INSPIRE].
126. T. Moroi, The muon anomalous magnetic dipole moment in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev.D 53 (1996) 6565 [Erratum ibid.D 56 (1997) 4424] [hep-ph/9512396] [INSPIRE].
127. S. Heinemeyer, D. Stöckinger and G. Weiglein, Two loop SUSY corrections to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Nucl. Phys.B 690 (2004) 62 [hep-ph/0312264] [INSPIRE].
128. G.-C. Cho, K. Hagiwara, Y. Matsumoto and D. Nomura, The MSSM confronts the precision electroweak data and the muon g − 2, JHEP11 (2011) 068 [arXiv:1104.1769] [INSPIRE].
129. M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, T. Kitahara and T. Yoshinaga, Probing bino contribution to muon g − 2, JHEP11 (2013) 013 [arXiv:1309.3065] [INSPIRE].
130. M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Yoshinaga, Muon g − 2 vs LHC in supersymmetric models, JHEP01 (2014) 123 [arXiv:1303.4256] [INSPIRE].
131. M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay, A. Choudhury, A. Datta and S. Poddar, The electroweak sector of the pMSSM in the light of LHC — 8 TeV and other data, JHEP07 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1404.4841] [INSPIRE].
132. Muon G-2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
133. B.L. Roberts, Status of the Fermilab muon (g − 2) experiment, Chin. Phys.C 34 (2010) 741 [arXiv:1001.2898] [INSPIRE].
134. 2) re-evaluated using new precise data, J. Phys.G 38 (2011) 085003 [arXiv:1105.3149] [INSPIRE].
135. A. Nyffeler, Status of hadronic light-by-light scattering in the muon g − 2, Nuovo Cim.C 037 (2014) 173 [arXiv:1312.4804] [INSPIRE].