Automating the processing steps for obtaining bone tissue-engineered substitutes: From imaging tools to bioreactors

Tissue Engineering - Part B: Reviews

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 567-577

  Costa, Pedro F ^a   Martins, Albino ^a   Neves, Nuno M ^a   Gomes, Manuela E ^a   Reis, Rui L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; MEDICAL IMAGING; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

AUTOMATED PRODUCTIONS; BONE TISSUE SUBSTITUTES; CLINICAL APPLICATION; ECONOMICALLY VIABLE; HUMAN INTERVENTION; LABOR INTENSIVE PROCESS; PRODUCT VARIABILITY; STRUCTURAL FEATURE;

TISSUE;

HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYLACTIC ACID; BONE PROSTHESIS;

AUTOMATION; BIOPRINTING; BIOREACTOR; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE TISSUE; CELL MEMBRANE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECOSYSTEM; FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING; LASER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POROSITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVERSE ENGINEERING; REVIEW; SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING; SHEAR STRESS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; BONE; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; PHARMACOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AUTOMATION; BIOREACTORS; BONE AND BONES; BONE SUBSTITUTES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84913597429     PISSN: 19373368     EISSN: 19373376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0751     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Brooks, P.M. The burden of musculoskeletal disease-A global perspective. Clin Rheumatol 25, 778, 2006.
2. Bohner, M. Resorbable biomaterials as bone graft substitutes. Mater Today 13, 24, 2010.
3. Damien, C.J., and Parsons, J.R. Bone-graft and bone-graft substitutes-A review of current technology and applications. J Appl Biomater 2, 187, 1991.
4. Quarto, R., Mastrogiacomo, M., Cancedda, R., Kutepov, S.M., Mukhachev, V., Lavroukov, A., et al. Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells. New Engl J Med 344, 385, 2001.
5. Brun, P., Dickinson, S.C., Zavan, B., Cortivo, R., Hollander, A.P., and Abatangelo, G. Characteristics of repair tissue in second-look and third-look biopsies from patients treated with engineered cartilage: relationship to symptomatology and time after implantation. Arthritis Res Ther 10, R132, 2008.
6. Eaglstein, W.H., and Falanga, V. Tissue engineering and the development of Apligraf(R), a human skin equivalent. Clin Ther 19, 894, 1997.
7. Mason, C. Automated tissue engineering: a major paradigm shift in health care. Med Device Technol 14, 16, 2003.
8. Sun, W., Darling, A., Starly, B., and Nam, J. Computeraided tissue engineering: overview, scope and challenges. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 39, 29, 2004.
9. Martin, I., Smith, T., and Wendt, D. Bioreactor-based roadmap for the translation of tissue engineering strategies into clinical products. Trends Biotechnol 27, 495, 2009.
10. Shefelbine, S.J., Simon, U., Claes, L., Gold, A., Gabet, Y., Bab, I., et al. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. Bone 36, 480, 2005.
11. Tuan, H.S., and Hutmacher, D.W. Application of micro CT and computation modeling in bone tissue engineering. Comput Aided Design 37, 1151, 2005.
12. Silva, D.N., De Oliveira, M.G., Meurer, E., Meurer, M.I., Da Silva JVL, and Santa-Barbara, A. Dimensional error in selective laser sintering and 3D-printing of models for craniomaxillary anatomy reconstruction. J Cranio Maxill Surg 36, 443, 2008.
13. Grayson, W.L., Frohlich, M., Yeager, K., Bhumiratana, S., Chan, M.E., Cannizzaro, C., et al. Engineering anatomically shaped human bone grafts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 3299, 2010.
14. Reiffel, A.J., Kafka, C., Hernandez, K.A., Popa, S., Perez, J.L., Zhou, S., et al. High-fidelity tissue engineering of patient-specific auricles for reconstruction of pediatric microtia and other auricular deformities. Plos One 8, 2013.
15. Kang, T.Y., Kang, H.W., Hwang, C.M., Lee, S.J., Park, J., Yoo, J.J., et al. The realistic prediction of oxygen transport in a tissue-engineered scaffold by introducing time-varying effective diffusion coefficients. Acta Biomater 7, 3345, 2011.
16. Otsuki, B., Takemoto, M., Fujibayashi, S., Neo, M., Kokubo, T., and Nakamura, T. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 27, 5892, 2006.
17. Mavrogenis, A.F., Dimitriou, R., Parvizi, J., and Babis, G.C. Biology of implant osseointegration. J Musculoskel Neuron 9, 61, 2009.
18. Eshraghi, S., and Das, S. Micromechanical finite-element modeling and experimental characterization of the compressive mechanical properties of polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds prepared by selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 8, 3138, 2012.
19. Hollister, S.J., Levy, R.A., Chu, T.M., Halloran, J.W., and Feinberg, S.E. An image-based approach for designing and manufacturing craniofacial scaffolds. Int J Oral Max Surg 29, 67, 2000.
20. Tellis, B.C., Szivek, J.A., Bliss, C.L., Margolis, D.S., Vaidyanathan, R.K., and Calvert, P. Trabecular scaffolds created using micro CT guided fused deposition modeling. Mat Sci Eng C Bio S 28, 171, 2008.
21. Wettergreen, M.A., Bucklen, B.S., Starly, B., Yuksel, E., Sun, W., and Liebschner, M.A.K. Creation of a unit block library of architectures for use in assembled scaffold engineering. Comput Aided Design 37, 1141, 2005.
22. Chen, Z., Su, Z., Ma, S., Wu, X., and Luo, Z. Biomimetic modeling and three-dimension reconstruction of the artificial bone. Comput Meth Prog Bio 88, 123, 2007.
23. Yasar, O., Lan, S.F., and Starly, B. A Lindenmayer systembased approach for the design of nutrient delivery networks in tissue constructs. Biofabrication 1, 045004, 2009.
24. Kermer, C., Rasse, M., Lagogiannis, G., Undt, G., Wagner, A., and Millesi, W. Colour stereolithography for planning complex maxillofacial tumour surgery. J Cranio Maxill Surg 26, 360, 1998.
25. Chow, J., Hui, E., Lee, P.K.M., and Li, W. Zygomatic implants-Protocol for immediate occlusal loading: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxil Surg 64, 804, 2006.
26. Ran, W., Liu, X.Z., Guo, B., Shu, D.L., and Tan, Z.M. Removal of a foreign body from the skull base using a customized computer-designed guide bar. J Cranio Maxill Surg 38, 279, 2010.
27. Chu, T.M.G., Halloran, J.W., Hollister, S.J., and Feinberg, S.E. Hydroxyapatite implants with designed internal architecture. J Mater Sci Mater M 12, 471, 2001.
28. Williams, J.M., Adewunmi, A., Schek, R.M., Flanagan, C.L., Krebsbach, P.H., Feinberg, S.E., et al. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26, 4817, 2005.
29. Eosoly, S., Brabazon, D., Lohfeld, S., and Looney, L. Selective laser sintering of hydroxyapatite/poly-e-caprolactone scaffolds. Acta Biomater 6, 2511, 2010.
30. Zein, I., Hutmacher, D.W., Tan, K.C., and Teoh, S.H. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23, 1169, 2002.
31. Jakab, K., Norotte, C., Marga, F., Murphy, K., Vunjak-Novakovic, G., and Forgacs, G. Tissue engineering by selfassembly and bio-printing of living cells. Biofabrication 2, 2010.
32. Norotte, C., Marga, F.S., Niklason, L.E., and Forgacs, G. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 30, 5910, 2009.
33. Schuurman, W., Khristov, V., Pot, M.W., van Weeren, P.R., Dhert, W.J.A., and Malda, J. Bioprinting of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable mechanical properties. Biofabrication 3, 2011.
34. Jetze, V., Benjamin, P., Thijs, J.B., Jelle, B., Wouter, J.A.D., Ferry, P.W.M., et al. Biofabrication of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs. Biofabrication 5, 035007. 2013.
35. Lemon, G., Howard, D., Tomlinson, M.J., Buttery, L.D., Rose, F.R.A.J., Waters, S.L., et al. Mathematical modelling of tissue-engineered angiogenesis. Math Biosci 221, 101, 2009.
36. Manoussaki, D. A mechanochemical model of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Esaim Math Model Num 37, 581, 2003.
37. Merks, R.M.H., and Koolwijk, P. Modeling morphogenesis in silico and in vitro: towards quantitative, predictive, cellbased modeling. Math Model Nat Pheno 4, 149, 2009.
38. Bancroft, G.N., Sikavitsast, V.I., van den Dolder, J., Sheffield, T.L., Ambrose, C.G., Jansen, J.A., et al. Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteloblasts in a dosedependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 12600, 2002.
39. Cartmell, S.H., Porter, B.D., Garcia, A.J., and Guldberg, R.E. Effects of medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded threedimensional bone constructs in vitro. Tissue Eng 9, 1197, 2003.
40. Grayson, W.L., Bhumiratana, S., Cannizzaro, C., Chao, P.H.G., Lennon, D.P., Caplan, A.I., et al. Effects of initial seeding density and fluid perfusion rate on formation of tissue-engineered bone. Tissue Eng Part A 14, 1809, 2008.
41. Sikavitsas, V.I., Bancroft, G.N., and Mikos, A.G. Formation of three-dimensional cell/polymer constructs for bone tissue engineering in a spinner flask and a rotating wall vessel bioreactor. J Biomed Mater Res 62, 136, 2002.
42. Sikavitsas, V.I., Bancroft, G.N., Holtorf, H.L., Jansen, J.A., and Mikos, A.G. Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 14683, 2003.
43. Goldstein, A.S., Juarez, T.M., Helmke, C.D., Gustin, M.C., and Mikos, A.G. Effect of convection on osteoblastic cell growth and function in biodegradable polymer foam scaffolds. Biomaterials 22, 1279, 2001.
44. Endres, S., Kratz, M., Wunsch, S., and Jones, D.B. Zetos: a culture loading system for trabecular bone. Investigation of different loading signal intensities on bovine bone cylinders. J Musculoskel Neuron 9, 173, 2009.
45. Henstock, J.R., Rotherham, M., Rose, J.B., and El Haj, A.J. Cyclic hydrostatic pressure stimulates enhanced bone development in the foetal chick femur in vitro. Bone 53, 468, 2013.
46. Srinivasan, S., Weimer, D.A., Agans, S.C., Bain, S.D., and Gross, T.S. Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle. J Bone Miner Res 17, 1613, 2002.
47. Allison, S.J., Folland, J.P., Rennie, W.J., Summers, G.D., and Brooke-Wavell, K. High impact exercise increased femoral neck bone mineral density in older men: A randomised unilateral intervention. Bone 53, 321, 2013.
48. Sikavitsas, V.I., Temenoff, J.S., and Mikos, A.G. Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. Biomaterials 22, 2581, 2001.
49. Gardel, L.S., Serra, L.A., Reis, R.L., and Gomes, M.E. Use of perfusion bioreactors and large animal models for long bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 20, 126, 2014.
50. Costa, P.F., Martins, A., Vaquette, C., Melchels, F.P., Neves, N.M., Gomes, M.E., et al. Bioreactor composed of watertight chamber and internal matrix for the generation of cellularized medical implants. Patent application WO 2013103306, 2013.
51. Koch, M.A., Vrij, E.J., Engel, E., Planell, J.A., and Lacroix, D. Perfusion cell seeding on large porous PLA/calcium phosphate composite scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor system under varying perfusion parameters. J Biomed Mater Res A 95A, 1011, 2010.
52. Janssen, F.W., van Dijkhuizen-Radersma, R., Van Oorschot, A., Oostra, J., de Bruijn, J.D., and Van Blitterswijk, C.A. Human tissue-engineered bone produced in clinically relevant amounts using a semi-Automated perfusion bioreactor system: a preliminary study. J Tissue Eng Regen M 4, 12, 2010.
53. Costa, P.F., Martins, A., Neves, N.M., Gomes, M.E., and Reis, R.L. Multichamber bioreactor with bidirectional perfusion integrated in culture system for tissue engineering strategies. European Patent Application 090098632009.
54. Rotenberg, M.Y., Ruvinov, E., Armoza, A., and Cohen, S. A multi-shear perfusion bioreactor for investigating shear stress effects in endothelial cell constructs. Lab Chip 12, 2696, 2012.
55. Figallo, E., Cannizzaro, C., Gerecht, S., Burdick, J.A., Langer, R., Elvassore, N., et al. Micro-bioreactor array for controlling cellular microenvironments. Lab Chip 7, 710, 2007.
56. Rolfe, P. Sensing in tissue bioreactors. Meas Sci Technol 17, 578, 2006.
57. Santoro, R., Krause, C., Martin, I., and Wendt, D. On-line monitoring of oxygen as a non-destructive method to quantify cells in engineered 3D tissue constructs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 6, 696, 2012.
58. Porter, B.D., Lin, A.S.P., Peister, A., Hutmacher, D., and Guldberg, R.E. Noninvasive image analysis of 3D construct mineralization in a perfusion bioreactor. Biomaterials 28, 2525, 2007.
59. Hagenmuller, H., Hitz, M., Merkle, H.P., Meinel, L., and Muller, R. Design and validation of a novel bioreactor principle to combine online micro-computed tomography monitoring and mechanical loading in bone tissue engineering. Rev Sci Instrum 81, 014303, 2010.
60. Costa, P.F., Vaquette, C., Baldwin, J., Chhaya, M., Gomes, M.E., Reis, R.L., Theodoropoulos, C., et al. Biofabrication of customized bone grafts by combination of additive manufacturing and bioreactor knowhow. Biofabrication, 2014 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI:10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035006.
61. Washburn, N.R., Weir, M., Anderson, P., and Potter, K. Bone formation in polymeric scaffolds evaluated by proton magnetic resonance microscopy and X-ray microtomography. J Biomed Mater Res A 69A, 738, 2004.
62. Xu, H., Othman, S.F., and Magin, R.L. Monitoring tissue engineering using magnetic resonance imaging. J Biosci Bioeng 106, 515, 2008.