Awareness and Attitudes about Open Access Publishing: A Glance at Generational Differences

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 604-610

  Rodriguez, Julia E ^a  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Demographics; Open access; Perceptions; Scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84913586028     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bosman J. Science Mag sting of OA journals: Is it about Open Access or about peer review? [Web log post] Retrieved from. http://im2punt0.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/science-mag-sting-of-oa-journals-is-it-about-open-access-or-about-peer-review/.
2. Buckland A., Eve M., Steel G., Gardy J., Salo D. On the mark? Responses to a sting. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2013, 2(1):eP1116. 10.7710/2162-3309.1116.
3. Coonin B., Younce L.M. Publishing in open access education journals: The authors' perspectives. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 2010, 29(2):118-132.
4. Dallmeier-Tiessen S., Darby R., Goerner B., Hyppoelae J., Igo-Kemenes P., Kahn D., et al. Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What scientists think about open access publishing 2011, (Retrieved from Cornell University Library, arXiv.org website: arxiv.org/pdf/1101.5260).
5. Davis P. SOAP survey requires clean interpretation of data [Web log post] Retrieved from. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/02/02/soap-open-access-survey/.
6. Deutskens E., De Ruyter K., Wetzels M., Oosterveld P. Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters 2004, 15(1):21-36.
7. Enserink M. As open access explodes, how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly?. Science 2012, 338(6110):1018.
8. Harley D., Acord S.K., Earl-Novell S., Lawrence S., King C.J. Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines 2010.
9. Harley D., Earl-Novell S., Arter J., Lawrence S., King C.J. The influence of academic values on scholarly publication and communication practices. Journal of Electronic Publishing 2007, 10(2). 10.3998/3336451.0010.204.
10. Housewright R., Schonfeld R.C., Wulfson K. Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2012 Retrieved from Ithaka S+R website. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/us-faculty-survey-2012.
11. Hurrell C., Meijer-Kline K. Open access up for review: Academic attitudes towards open access publishing in relation to tenure and promotion. openexcess: The Journal of Scholarly Communicators 2011, 1(2).
12. Laakso M., Bjork B. Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine 2012, 10(1):124.
13. Meadows A. Open access - What do authors really want? [Web log post]. Retrieved from:. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/11/01/open-access-what-do-authors-really-want/.
14. Morris S., Thorn S. Learned society members and open access. Learned Publishing 2009, 22(3):221-239.
15. Nariani R., Fernandez L. Open access publishing: What authors want. College & Research Libraries 2012, 73(2):182-195.
16. Norwick E.A. Academic rank of authors publishing in open access journals. Agricultural Information Worldwide 2008, 1(2):45-51.
17. Rowlands I., Nicholas D. The changing scholarly communication landscape: An international survey of senior researchers. Learned Publishing 2006, 19(1):31-55.
18. Rowlands I., Nicholas D., Huntington P. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want?. Learned Publishing 2004, 17(4):261-273.
19. Schonfeld R.C., Housewright R. Faculty survey 2009: Key strategic insights for libraries, publishers, and societies Retrieved from Ithaka S+R website. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/faculty-survey-2009.
20. Schroter S., Tite L. Open access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2006, 99(3):141-148.
21. Solomon D.J., Björk B. Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2012, 63(1):98-107.
22. Suber P. Very brief introduction to open access Retrieved from. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/brief.htm.
23. Swan A., Brown S. Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing 2004, 17(3):219-224.
24. The University of California Office of Scholarly Communication and the California Digital Library eShcolarship Program Faculty attitudes and behaviors regarding scholarly communication: Survey finding from the University of California Retrieved from. http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/responses/materials/OSC-survey-summaries-20070828.pdf.
25. Warlick S., Vaughan K. Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries 2007, 4(1):1-12. 10.1186/1742-5581-4-1.
26. Xia J. A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61(3):615-624.