Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 75, Issue , 2015, Pages 154-159

  Jovanović, Veljko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Bifactor model; Emotional well being; Mental health continuum; Psychological well being; Social well being; Well being

Indexed keywords

EID: 84913585224     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.026     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abbott R.A., Ploubidis G.B., Huppert F.A., Kuh D., Croudace T.J. An evaluation of the precision of measurement of Ryff's psychological well-being scales in a population sample. Social Research Indicators 2010, 97:357-373. 10.1007/s11205-009-9506-x.
2. Barrett P. Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences 2007, 42:815-824. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018.
3. Brouwer D., Meijer R.R., Zevalkink J. On the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: G is the key. Psychological Assessment 2013, 25:136-145. 10.1037/a0029228.
4. Brown T.A. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research 2006, Guilford Publications, NY.
5. Chen F.F., Jing Y., Hayes A., Lee J. Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 2013, 14:1033-1068. 10.1007/s10902-012-9367-x.
6. Cheung G.W., Rensvold R.B. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 2002, 9(2):233-255. 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
7. Delle Fave A., Brdar I., Freire T., Vella-Brodrick D., Wissing M.P. The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness. Social Indicators Research 2011, 100:158-207. 10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5.
8. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 1985, 49:71-75. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
9. Gallagher M.W., Lopez S.J., Preacher K.J. The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality 2009, 77:1025-1050. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x.
10. Gignac G.E., Watkins M.W. Bifactor modeling and the estimation of model-based reliability in the WAIS-IV. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2013, 48:639-662. 10.1080/00273171.2013.804398.
11. Hone L.C., Jarden A., Schofield G.M., Duncan S. Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing 2014, 4(1):62-90. 10.5502/ijw.v4i1.4.
12. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 6(1):1-55. 10.1080/10705519909540118.
13. Joshanloo M., Wissing M.P., Khumalo I.P., Lamers S.M.A. Measurement invariance of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) across three cultural groups. Personality and Individual Differences 2013, 55:755-759. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.002.
14. Karaś D., Cieciuch J., Keyes C.L.M. The Polish adaptation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Personality and Individual Differences 2014, 69:104-109. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.011.
15. Keyes C.L.M. The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2002, 43:207-222. 10.2307/3090197.
16. Keyes C.L.M. Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2005, 73(3):539-548. 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539.
17. Keyes C.L.M., Wissing M., Potgieter J., Temane M., Kruger A., van Rooy S. Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2008, 15:181-192. 10.1002/cpp.572.
18. Kline R.B. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling 2005, Guilford Press, New York. 2nd ed.
19. Lamers S.M.A., Westerhof G.J., Bohlmeijer E.T., ten Klooster P.M., Keyes C.L.M. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology 2011, 67(1):99-110. 10.1002/jclp.20741.
20. McCain J.L., Jonason P.K., Foster J.D., Campbell W.K. The bifactor structure and the "dark nomological network" of the State Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Individual Differences 2015, 72:1-6. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.006.
21. Petrillo, G., Capone, V., Caso, D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (in press). The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) as a measure of well-being in the Italian context. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0629-3.
22. Reise S.P. The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2012, 47:667-696. 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.
23. Reise S., Moore T., Haviland M. Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment 2010, 92:544-559. 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
24. Reise S.P., Moore T.M., Sabb F.W., Brown A.K., London E.D. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11: Reassessment of its structure in a community sample. Psychological Assessment 2013, 25:631-642. 10.1037/a0032161.
25. Reise S.P., Morizot J., Hays R.D. The role of bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcome measures. Quality of Life Research 2007, 16:19-31. 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.
26. Ro E., Clark L.A. Psychosocial functioning in the context of diagnosis: Assessment and theoretical issues. Psychological Assessment 2009, 21:313-324. 10.1037/a0016611.
27. Ryff C.D. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57(6):1069-1081. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
28. Shrout P.E., Lane S.P. Reliability. APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics 2012, 1:643-660. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. 10.1037/13619-034. H. Cooper (Ed.).
29. Springer K.W., Hauser R.M. An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff's scales of psychological well-being: Method, mode and measurement effects. Social Science Research 2006, 35:1079-1101. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004.
30. van Dierendonck D., Díaz D., Rodríguez-Carvajal R., Blanco A., Moreno-Jiménez B. Ryff's six-factor model of psychological well-being, A Spanish exploration. Social Indicators Research 2008, 87:473-479. 10.1007/s11205-007-9174-7.
31. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 47:1063-1070. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
32. H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika 2005, 70:123-133. 10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7.