Building energy modeling: A systematic approach to zoning and model reduction using Koopman Mode Analysis

Energy and Buildings

Volumn 86, Issue , 2015, Pages 794-802

  Georgescu, Michael ^a,b   Mezić, Igor ^a,b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Building energy models; Data visualization; Koopman operator; Lumped models; Model order reduction; Model zoning

Indexed keywords

DATA VISUALIZATION; ZONING;

BUILDING ENERGY MODEL; BUILDING PERFORMANCE; BUILDING SIMULATION; DIFFERENT TIME SCALE; KOOPMAN OPERATOR; LUMPED MODELS; MODEL ORDER REDUCTION; THERMAL BEHAVIORS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 84913580186     PISSN: 03787788     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.046     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J. Binks, Closing the loop. office tower simulation assumptions vs reality, in: Building Simulation 2011. Proceedings. Twelfth International Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2011, pp. 941-948 http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2011/P-1362.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
2. S. Gross, H. Hu, A feasibility study on natural ventilation in a midrise student dormitory building, in: Building Simulation 2011. Proceedings. Twelfth International Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2011, pp. 878-885 http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/bs2011/p-1350.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
3. D. Hes, A. Dawkins, C. Jensen, L. Aye, A modelling method to assess the effect of tree shading for building performance simulation, in: Building Simulation 2011. Proceedings. Twelfth International Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2011, pp. 161-168 http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2011/P-1176.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
4. B. Eisenhower, Z. O'Neill, V.A. Fonoberov, I. Mezi, Uncertainty and sensitivity decomposition of building energy models, Journal of Building Performance Simulation 5 (3) (2012) 171-184., http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2010.549964.
5. UCSGBC, Leed-nc (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) version 2.2, 2011. www.usgbc.org/leed/nc/ (accessed on 02.13.12).
6. L. Chahwane, L. Stephan, E. Wurtz, B. Zuber, On a novel approach to control natural and mechanical night ventilation, in: Building Simulation 2011. Proceedings. Twelfth International Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2011, pp. 1800-1807 http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2011/P-1584.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
7. K. Kabele, J. Bartonova, M. Patakiova, K. Vavrinova, Simulation in control system sensor location design, in: Building Simulation 2011. Proceedings. Twelfth International Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2011, pp. 2573-2574 http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2011/P-1798.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
8. F. Oldewurtel, A. Parisio, C.N. Jones, D. Gyalistras, M. Gwerder, V. Stauch, B. Lehmann, M. Morari, Use of model predictive control and weather forecasts for energy efficient building climate control, Energy and Buildings 45 (0) (2012) 15-27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.022 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778811004105
9. P. May-Ostendorp, G.P. Henze, C.D. Corbin, B. Rajagopalan, C. Felsmann, Model-predictive control of mixed-mode buildings with rule extraction, Building and Environment 46 (2) (2011) 428-437, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.08.004 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132310002477
10. S. Royer, S. Thil, T. Talbert, M. Polit, A procedure for modeling buildings and their thermal zones using co-simulation and system identification, Energy and Buildings 78 (0) (2014) 231-237, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.013 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778814003132
11. D. Bradley, M. Kummert, T. McDowell, Experiences with and interpretation of standard test methods of building energy analysis tools, in: Proceedings of the International Building Performance Simulation Association-Canada Bi-Annual Conference, eSIM 2004, 2004 http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/6582/1/strathprints006582.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
12. US:DOE, EnergyPlus Simulation Software: Testing and Validation, 2013 (accessed on 07.15.13).
13. I. Mezic, Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions., Nonlinear Dynamics 41 (2005) 309-325.
14. C. Rowley, Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 15 (03) (2005) 997-1013.
15. R.W. Freund, Krylov-subspace methods for reduced-order modeling in circuit simulation, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 123 (1) (2000) 395-421.
16. W. O'Brien, A. Athienitis, T. Kesik, Thermal zoning and interzonal airflow in the design and simulation of solar houses: a sensitivity analysis, Journal of Building Performance Simulation 4 (3) (2011) 239-256.
17. V. Chandan, A. Alleyne, Optimal partitioning for the decentralized thermal control of buildings, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology (2013) (accessed on 07.15.13).
18. S. Goyal, P. Barooah, A method for model-reduction of non-linear thermal dynamics of multi-zone buildings, Energy and Buildings 47 (0) (2012) 332-340, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.005 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778811006001
19. C. Rowley, I. Mezic, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, D. Henningson, Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 641 (2009) 115-127.
20. Y. Susuki, I. Mezic, Nonlinear Koopman modes of coupled swing dynamics and coherency identification, in: Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2010 IEEE, 2010, pp. 1-8.
21. Y. Susuki, I. Mezic, Nonlinear Koopman modes and coherency identification of coupled swing dynamics, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 26 (4) (2011) 1894-1904, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2103369.
22. B. Eisenhower, T. Maile, M. Fischer, I. Mezic, Decomposing building systems data for model validation and analysis using the Koopman operator, in: Sim-Build 2010. Proceedings. Fourth National Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association-USA, 2010, pp. 434-441 http://www.ibpsa.us/pub/simbuild2010/papers/SB10-DOC-TS08B-03-Eisenhower.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
23. M. Georgescu, B. Eisenhower, I. Mezić, Creating zoning approximations to building energy models using the Koopman operator, in: SimBuild 2012. Proceedings. fifth National Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association-USA, 2012, pp. 40-47 http://www.ibpsa.us/simbuild2012/Papers/SB12-TS01b-3-Georgescu.pdf (accessed on 07.15.13).
24. ASHRAE, ASHRAE Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2010, https://www.ashrae.org/standardsresearch-technology/standards-guidelines (accessed on 07.15.13).
25. I. Mezic, A. Banaszuk, Comparison of systems with complex behavior, Physica D 197 (2004) 101-133.
26. M. Budisic, R. Mohr, I. Mezic, Applied Koopmanism, chaos: an interdisciplinary, Journal of Nonlinear Science 22 (4) (2012) 047510, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4772195 http://link.aip.org/link/?CHA/22/047510/1,.
27. DesignBuilder, 2012. http://designbuilderusa.com/ (accessed on 01.15.13).
28. N. Jones, B. McCrone, B. Walter, K. Pratt, D. Greenberg, Automated translation and thermal zoning of digital building models for energy analysis, in:, in: Building Simulation 2013. Proceedings. Thirteenth International Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2013, pp. 202-209 http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2013/p-1027.pdf