Materials, technology and society: Contributions from a sociological perspective

Materiaux et Techniques

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  D'Andrea, L ^a   Declich, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Life cycle assessment; Materials; Science and technology studies; Sociology

Indexed keywords

MATERIALS;

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); POSSIBLE FUTURES; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES; SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS; SOCIOLOGY;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 84913539776     PISSN: 00326895     EISSN: 17783771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/mattech/2014031     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. L. d'Andrea, A. Declich, F. Feudo, Matériaux & Techniques, 102 (2014) 504
2. K. Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, New York. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1929
3. M. Weber, Wissenschaft als Beruf, Gesammlte Aufsaetze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tubingen, 1922, pp. 524-55
4. R.K. Merton, The Normative Structure of Science, in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by R.K. Merton, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973
5. F. Hanson, Evaluation 12 (2006) 159-178
6. D. Kellog, Toward a Post-Academic Science Policy: Scientific Communication and the Collapse of the Mertonian Norms, International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, Fall, 2006
7. H. van den Belt, Comments on Bulger: The responsible conduct of research, including responsible authorship and publication practices, in Ethics for Life Scientists, edited by M. Korthals, Michiel, R.J. Bogers, Berlin, Springer, 2004
8. D. Bloor, Knowledge and Social Imagery, London. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976
9. H. Collins, T. Pinch, The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993
10. S. Woolgar, Sci. Technol. Human Values 16 (1991)
11. D. MacKenzie, J. Wajcman, The Social Shaping of Technology, How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum, Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1985
12. W.E. Bijker, T. Hughes, T. Pinch, (Eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Cambridge MA/London, MIT Press, 1987
13. W.E. Bijker, of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs, Toward a theory of sociotechnical change, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995
14. D. Lyon, Surveillance society. Monitoring everyday life, Open University Press, Buckingham, 2001
15. C. Norris, D. Mezzana, The Social trends involved in surveillance and the rise of new regimes, Paper presented at the fifth Biannual Surveillance and Society Conference, 2012, pp. 2-4
16. M. Petkovic, W. Jonker, (Eds.) Security, Privacy and Trust in Modern Data Management, Berlin, Springer- Verlag, 2007
17. P. Berger, T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY, Doubleday, 1966
18. B. Latour, S.Woolgar, Laboratory Life. The construction of scientific facts, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, 1979
19. K. Knorr-Cetina, The manufacture of Knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science, Oxford, Pergamon, 1981
20. P. Bourdieu, Science of Science and Reflexivity, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 2004
21. N. Gilbert, M. Mulkay, Opening Pandora's box. A Sociological Analysis of the Scientific Discourse, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984
22. B. Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard, Harvard University Press, 1987
23. B. Wynne, May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide, in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wynne (eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, London, Sage Publications, 1996
24. J. Gregory, S. Miller, Science in Public: communication, culture and credibility, New York, Plenum, 1998
25. S. Miller, Public Understand. Sci. 10 (2001) 115-120
26. B.B. Johnson, V.T. Covello, (eds.), The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1987
27. P.C. Stern, H.V. Fineberg, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, Washington, DC, National Academy of Science Press, 1996
28. A. Mazur, The Dynamics of Technical Controversy, Washington DC, Communications Press, 1981
29. G. Markle, J. Petersen, Controversies in Science a Technology. A protocol for Comparative Research, Sci. Technol. Human Values 6 (1981) 34
30. A. Irwin, Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. London, Routledge, 1995
31. S.E. Cozzens, E.J. Woodhouse, Science, government, and the politics of knowledge, in Handbook of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, T. Pinch, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1995
32. S. Jasanoff, Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2005
33. European Commission, The Sixth Framework Programme in brief, December Edition, Brussels, 2002
34. J. Ziman, Real Science. What it is, and what it means, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000
35. A.M. Weinberg, Science 134 (1961) 3473
36. P. Galison, B. Hevly, Big Science: The Growth of Largescale Research, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1992
37. M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow, The New Production of Knowledge, The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary societies, London, SAGE Publications, 1994
38. H. Nowotny, P. Scott, M. Gibbons, Re-Thinking Science - Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2001
39. H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff, (eds.) Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry- Government Relations, London, Cassel Academic, 1997
40. H. Nowotny, Knowledge Production and its Constraints: epistemic and societal considerations, paper presented at the Gulbenkian Foundation, Lisbon, 2007, pp. 25-26
41. S. Turkle, Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1995
42. K.J. Gergen, Technology and the self: from the essential to the sublime, in Constructing the self in a mediated world, edited by D. Grodin, R. Lindlof, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1996
43. A. Ben Zeev, Love online: emotions on the Internet, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004
44. M. Nadin, The Civilization of Illiteracy, Dresden, Dresden University Press, 1998
45. W. Veen, Homo Zappiens. Growing Up in a Digital Age, Network Continuum Education, 2007
46. H. Nowotny, G. Testa, Naked Genes: Reinventing the Human in the Molecular Age, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press (quoted from the Italian edition of 2012), 2011
47. N.K. Haykles, How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies In Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1999
48. Featherstone, M., Burrows, R. (Eds) (1995) Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technologial Embodiment, London, Sage.
49. W.E. Bijker, in The social construction of Bakelite, edited by W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, Pinch T., 1987
50. A. Macfarlane, G. Martin, The Glass Bathyscaphe. How Glass Changed the World, Profile Books Ltd, London (quoted from the Italian edition of 2003), 2002
51. B. Latour, Politics of nature: East and West, Perspectives, Ethics & Global Politics 4 (2011) 1-10
52. B. Latour, Non siamo mai stati moderni. Saggio di antropologia simmetrica, Milano, Eleuthera, 1995
53. M. Bucchi, Sociologia della scienza, in Nuova Informazione Bibliografica, Anno I, n.3/Luglio- Settembre, 2004
54. J.P. Birat, Materials, beyond Life Cycle Thinking, Revue de Métallurgie 109 (2012) 273-291
55. UNEP/SETAC (2009), Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products, UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris, www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines-sLCA.pdf
56. UNEP/SETAC (2011), Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Making informed choices on products, UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris, http://www.unep.org/pdf/UNEP-LifecycleInit-Dec- FINAL.pdf
57. W.E. Bijker, Sustainable Policy? A Public Debate about Nature Development in the Netherlands, History and Technology 20 (2004) 371-391