Sustainable policy? A public debate about nature development in the Netherlands

History and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 371-391

  Bijker, Wiebe E ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Citizens; Democratization; Nature Development; Participation; Public Debates; Social Constructivism

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050254083     PISSN: 07341512     EISSN: 14772620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0734151042000304349     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aarts MNC, Molder HFMt., ‘Spreken over natuur, een discourse-analytische studie van een debat.’ In Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? Verslag van een debat edited by N. E. v. d. Poll and A. Glasmeier. Den Haag Rathenau Instituut 1997
2. Andringa JM, Schot J, ‘Public Participation in Environmental Science and Technology: The Dutch National Experience, 1960s–1990s.’ In Public Participation and Sustainable Development. Comparing European Experiences edited by A. Jamison and P. Østby. Aalborg Aalborg Universitetsforlag 1997
3. Bijker WE, Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs. Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change Cambridge MA MIT Press 1995
4. —— ‘Sociohistorical Technology Studies.’ In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch. London Sage 1995
5. Bijker WE, La bicicletta e altre Innovazioni Milan McGraw-Hill Libri Italia 1998
6. Bijker WE, Leonards C, Wackers G, EU-ACP Policy Dialogue on Research and Technology for Development (RTD). Methodology for RTD Diagnostic Studies in ACP Countries Maastricht Universiteit Maastricht 2000
7. Collins HM, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice London Sage 1985
8. Edge, D. (1999). ‘Editorial Postscript.’. Social Studies of Science, 29 (no. 5): 790–9.
9. Feenberg A, Hannay A, eds Technology and the Politics of Knowledge Bloomington and Indianapolis Indiana University Press 1995
10. Gieryn T, Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line Chicago IL The University of Chicago Press 1999
11. Guston, DH. (1999). ‘Evaluating the First US Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens' Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy.’. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24 (no. 4): 451–82.
12. Jamison A, Østby P, eds Public Participation and Sustainable Development. Comparing European Experiences 1 Aalborg Aalborg Universitetsforlag 1997
13. Jamison A, Eyerman R, Cramer J, The Making of the New Environmental Consciousness Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press 1990
14. Jasanoff S, The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policymakers Cambridge MA Harvard University Press 1990
15. —— Markle GE, Petersen JC, Pinch T, eds Handbook of Science and Technology Studies London Sage 1995
16. Latour B, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society Cambridge Harvard University Press 1987
17. Panel N, ‘Slotverklaring Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? (met drie bijlagen).’ In Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? Verslag van een debat edited by N. E. v. d. Poll and A. Glasmeier. Den Haag Rathenau Instituut 1997
18. Piller C, The Fail-Safe Society: Community Defiance and the End of American Technological Optimism Berkeley CA University of California Press 1991
19. Platform We. E, Platform Wetenschap en Techniek. Evaluatie 1994–1997 Den Haag Rathenau Instituut 1997
20. Poll NEv. d., Glasmeier A, ‘Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? Evaluatie van een debat’ In Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? Verslag van een debat edited by N. E. v. d. Poll and A. Glasmeier. Den Haag Rathenau Instituut 1997
21. ——, eds Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? Verslag van een debat Den Haag Rathenau Instituut 1997
22. Popper KR, The Logic of Scientific Discovery London Hutchinson 1959
23. —— Conjectures and Refutations London Routledge and Kegan Paul 1963
24. Rogers, R. (1998). ‘Whither Public Participation in Technology?’. EASST Review, 17 (no. 4): 40–3.
25. Rowe, G, and Frewer, LJ. (2000). ‘Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.’. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25 (no. 1): 3–29.
26. Sclove RE, Democracy and Technology New York The Guilford Press 1995
27. Swart JAA, Windt HJv. d., Keulartz J, ‘Valuation Of Nature In Conservation And Restoration.’ Restauration Ecology 2001
28. Wackers G, Hoorn Tv., Bijker WE, ‘Het natuurontwikkelingsdebat: dilemma's van een open leerproces.’ In Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? Verslag van een debat edited by N. E. v. d. Poll and A. Glasmeier. Den Haag Rathenau Instituut 1997
29. Weinberg, AM. (1972). ‘Science and Trans-science.’. Minerva, 10: 209–22.
30. Windt HJv. d., En dan: wat is natuur nog in dit land? Natuurbescherming in Nederland, 1880–1990 Amsterdam Boom 1995
31. Windt HJv. d., Swart JAA, Rabbinge R, ‘De wortels en dilemma's van natuurontwikkeling.’ In Natuurontwikkeling: waarom en hoe? Verslag van een debat edited by N. E. v. d. Poll and A. Glasmeier. Den Haag Rathenau Instituut 1997
32. Winner L, The Whale and the Reactor. A Search for the Limits in an Age of High Technology Chicago IL University of Chicago Press 1986
33. Yearley S, ‘The Environmental Challenge to Science Studies.’ In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch. London Sage 1995