A modeling framework to assess water and nitrate balances in the Western Bug river basin, Ukraine

Advances in Geosciences

Volumn 32, Issue , 2012, Pages 85-92

  Wahren, F Tavares ^a   Helm, B ^a   Schumacher, F ^a   Pluntke, T ^a   Feger, K H ^a   Schwarzel K ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; ASSESSMENT METHOD; ECOHYDROLOGY; LAND USE; NITRATE; WATER BUDGET; WATER RESOURCE;

BUG BASIN; UKRAINE; USSR;

EID: 84912134602     PISSN: 16807340     EISSN: 16807359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-32-85-2012     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbaspour, K. C.: User Manual for SWAT-CUP SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Programs, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Dübendorf, Switzerland, available at: Http://www.eawag.ch/organisation/abteilungen/siam/software/swat/indexEN (last access: January 2010), 2007.
2. Abbaspour, K. C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bogner, K., Mieleitner, J., Zobrist, J., and Srinivasan, R.: Modelling hydrology and water quality in the prealpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT, J. Hydrol., 333, 413-430, 2007.
3. Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment-Part 1. Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 73-89, 1998.
4. Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R., Haney, E. B., and Neitsch, S. L.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output Documentation Version 2009, TexasWater Resources Institute Technical Report No. 365, 2011.
5. Blumensaat, F., Wolfram, M., and Krebs, P.: Sewer model development under minimum data requirements, Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 1427-1437, doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1146-1, 2012.
6. ECA&D: Available at: Http://eca.knmi.nl/, last access: November 2010.
7. Eckhardt, K., Haverkamp, S., Fohrer, N., and Frede, H.-G.: SWATG, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments, Phys. Chem. Earth, 27, 641-644, 2002.
8. Ertel, A.-M., Lupo, A., Scheifhacken, N., Bodnarchuk, T., Manturova, O., Berendonk, T. U., and Petzoldt, T,: Heavy load and high potential: Anthropogenic pressures and their impacts on the water quality along a lowland river (Western Bug, Ukraine), Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 1459-1473, doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1289-0, 2012.
9. Faramarzi, M., Abbaspour, K. C., Schulin, R., and Yang, H.: Modelling blue and green water resources availability in Iran, Hydrol. Process., 23, 486-501, 2009.
10. Fiorillo, F. and Doglioni, A.: The relation between karst spring discharge and rainfall by cross-correlation analysis (Campania, southern Italy), Hydrogeol. J., 18, 1881-1895, 2010.
11. Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., and Arnold, J. G.: The soil and water assessment tool historical development, applications, and future research directions, T. ASABE, 50, 1211-1250, 2007.
12. Holvoet, K., Van Griensven, A., Seuntjens, P., and Vanrolleghem, P. A.: Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT, Phys. Chem. Earth, 30, 518-526, 2005.
13. Inamdar, S. and Naumov, A.: Assessment of Sediment Yields for a Mixed-landuse Great Lakes Watershed: Lessons from Field Measurements and Modeling, J. Great Lakes Res., 32, 471-488, 2006.
14. Kalbacher, T., Delfs, J.-O., Shao, H., Wang, W., Walther, M., Samaniego, L., Schneider, C., Musolff, M., Centler, F., Sun, F., Hildebrandt, A., Liedl, L., Borchardt, D., Krebs, P., and Kolditz, O.: The IWAS-ToolBox: Software coupling for an IntegratedWater Resources Management, Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 1367-1380, doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1270-y, 2012.
15. Kiesel, J., Fohrer, N., Schmalz, B., and White, M. J.: Incorporating landscape depressions and tile drainages of lowland catchments into spatially distributed hydrologic modelling, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1472-1486, 2010.
16. Kirsch, K., Kirsch, A., and Arnold, J. G.: Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Loads in the Rock River Basin Using SWAT, T. ASAE, 45, 1757-1769, 2002.
17. Lam, Q. D., Schmalz, B., and Fohrer, N.: Modelling point and diffuse source pollution of nitrate in a rural lowland catchment using the SWAT model, Agr. Water Manage., 97, 317-325, 2010.
18. Lenhart, T., Eckhardt, K., Fohrer, N., and Frede, H.-G.: Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis, Phys. Chem. Earth, 27, 645-654, 2002.
19. Mander, U., Kull, A., Kuusemets, V., and Tamm, T.: Nutrient runoff dynamics in a rural catchment: Influence of land-use changes, climatic fluctuations and ecotechnological measures, Ecol. Eng., 14, 405-417, 2000.
20. Meissner, R., Seeger, J., and Rupp, H.: Lysimeter studies in East Germany concerning the influence of set aside of intensively farmed land on the seepage water quality, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 67, 161-173, 1998.
21. METI, NASA: ASTER Global DEM-Start distribution, 2009.
22. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., and Williams, J. R.: Soil andWater Assessment Tool. User's Manual, Version 2005, GSWRL Report 02-02, BRC Report 2-06, Temple, Texas, USA, 2002.
23. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R.,Williams, J. R., and King, K.W.: Soil and water assessment tool, in: Theoretical Documentation: Version 2005, TWRI TR-191, 2005.
24. NOAA: Climate data online: Daily observational data, available at: Http://gis.ncdc.noaa.gov/map/cdo/, last access: November 2011.
25. Pekarova, P. and Pekar, J.: The impact of land use on stream water quality in Slovakia, J. Hydrol., 180, 333-350, 1996.
26. Pospelova, G.: Anbau und Züchtung von Weizen in Der Ukraine, Giessener Abhandlungen zur Agrar-und Wirtschaftsforschung des europaïschen Ostens, Band 218, Osteuropastudien Der Hochschulen des Landes Hessen, Reihe I, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1997.
27. Pospelova, G. and Schinke, E.: Anbau und Verarbeitung von Zuckerr üben in Der Ukraine, Giessener Abhandlungen zur Agrarund Wirtschaftsforschung des europaïschen Ostens Band 221, Osteuropatsuiden Der Hochschule des Landes Hessen, Reihe I, Duncker & Humboldt, Berlin, 1997.
28. Schanze, J., Trümper, J., Burmeister, C., Pavlik, D., and Kruglov, I.: A methodology for dealing with regional change in integrated water resource management, Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 1405-1414, doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1311-6, 2012.
29. Scheifhacken, N., Haase, U., Gram-Radu, L., Kozovyi, R., and Berendonk, T. U.: How to assess hydromorphology? A comparison of Ukrainian and German approaches, Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 1483-1499, doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1218-2, 2012.
30. Schmalz, B. and Fohrer, N.: Comparing model sensitivities of different landscapes using the ecohydrological SWAT model, Adv. Geosci., 21, 91-98, doi:10.5194/adgeo-21-91-2009, 2009.
31. Schuol, J., Abbaspour, K. C., Srinivasan, R., and Yang, H.: Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 352, 30-49, 2008.
32. Shanti, C., Arnold, J., Williams, J., Hauck, L., and Dugas, W.: Application of a watershed model to evaluate management effects on point and non-point source pollution, T. ASAE, 44, 1559-1570, 2001.
33. Spruill, C. A., Workman, S. R., and Taraba, J. L.: Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model, T. ASAE, 43, 1431-1439, 2000.
34. Stalnacke, P., Grimvall, A., Libiseller, C., Laznik, M., and Kokorite, I.: Trends in nutrient concentrations in Latvian rivers and the response to the dramatic change in agriculture, J. Hydrol., 283, 184-205, 2003.
35. Stone, M. and Krishnappan, B. G.: The effect of irrigation on tile sediment transport in a headwater stream, Water Res., 36, 3439-3448, 2002.
36. Strauch, M., Bernhofer, C., Koide, S., Volk, M., Lorz, C., and Makeschin, F.: Using precipitation data ensemble for uncertainty analysis in SWAT streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 414-415, 413-424, 2012.
37. Szolgayová, E., Blöschl, G., and Bucher, C.: Factors influencing long range dependence in stream flow of European rivers, Geophys. Res. Abstr., EGU2012-10776, EGU General Assembly 2012, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
38. TACIS: Transboundary Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment: Bug and Latorica/Uzh Kyiv, TACIS, 2001.
39. Tavares Wahren, F., Tarasiuk, M., Mykhnovych, A., Kit, M., Feger, K. H., and Schwärzel, K.: Estimation of spatially distributed soil information, Dealing with data shortages in the Western Bug Basin, Ukraine, Environ. Earth Sci., 65, 1501-1510, doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1197-3, 2012.
40. Terekhanova, T.: Quantification of water and nutrient flows on a river catchment under scarce data conditions-A case study of Western Bug river basin, Ukraine, MSc Thesis, Intitute of Urban Water Management, TU Dresden, Germany, 2009.
41. Ulrich, A. and Volk, M.: Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of alternative management practices on water quality and quantity, Agr. Water Manage., 96, 1207-1217, 2009.
42. Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D.: Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edition, Springer-Verlag, 2002.
43. von Cramon-Taubadel, S. and Striewe, L.: Die Transformation Der Landwirtschaft in Der Ukraine-Ein weites Feld , Kiel, Wiss.-Verl. Vauk. Agrarökonomische Monographien und Sammelwerke, 1999.
44. Zingstra, H., Simeonova, V., and Kitnaes, K.: Protection and management of the Bug River as an ecological corridor in the Pan European Ecological Network, Final report of the BBI-MATRA project 2006/015, Wageningen International, 2009.