Selection and study performance: Comparing three admission processes within one medical school

Medical Education

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1201-1210

  Schripsema, Nienke R ^a   van Trigt, Anke M ^a   Borleffs, Jan C C ^a   Cohen Schotanus, Janke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL SCHOOL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES;

ACHIEVEMENT; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84912094884     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12537     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Siu E, Reiter HI. Overview: what's worked and what hasn't as a guide towards predictive admissions tool development. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:759-75.
2. Kreiter CD, Kreiter Y. A validity generalisation perspective on the ability of undergraduate GPA and the Medical College Admission Test to predict important outcomes. Teach Learn Med 2007;19:95-100.
3. Julian ER. Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for predicting medical school performance. Acad Med 2005;80:910-7.
4. Donnon T, Paolucci EO, Violato C. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: a meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med 2007;82:100-6.
5. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Trinh K, Wasi P, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Med Educ 2009;43:767-75.
6. Griffin B, Wilson I. Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012;17:377-88.
7. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007;41:378-84.
8. Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Wood TJ, Norman GR. Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores. JAMA 2012;308 (21):2233-40.
9. Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Norman GR. Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: a comparison of those who were and were not accepted at McMaster. Teach Learn Med 2002;14:43-8.
10. O'Neill L, Hartvigsen J, Wallstedt B, Korsholm L, Eika B. Medical school dropout - testing at admission versus selection by highest grades as predictors. Med Educ 2011;45:1111-20.
11. Urlings-Strop LC, Stijnen T, Themmen APN, Splinter TAW. Selection of medical students: a controlled experiment. Med Educ 2009;43:175-83.
12. Urlings-Strop LC, Stinjnen T, Themmen APN, Splinter TAW. Selected medical students achieve better than lottery-admitted students during clerkships. Med Educ 2011;45:1032-40.
13. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen APN. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ 2012;46:678-88.
14. Rhoads JM, Gallemore JLJ, Gianturco DT, Osterhout S. Motivation, medical school admissions, and student performance. J Med Educ 1974;49:1119-27.
15. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Muijtjens AMM, Thoben AJNM, Cohen-Schotanus J, van Boven CPA. Cross-institutional collaboration in assessment: a case on progress testing. Med Teach 2004;26:719-25.
16. Schuwirth LWT, Bosman G, Henning RH, Rinkel R, Wenink ACG. Collaboration on progress testing in medical schools in the Netherlands. Med Teach 2010;32:476-9.
17. Dienst Uitvoering Onderwijs. Je inlotingskansen. [Your lottery chances.] 2013. http://www.duo.nl/particulieren/student-hbo-of-universiteit/loten/je-inlotingskansen.asp. [Accessed 9 July 2014.]
18. University of Groningen. Personal data protection. 2013. http://www.rug.nl/education/laws-regulations-complaints/2013-2014/gedragsregels/beschermingpersoonsgegevens. [Accessed 9 July 2014.]
19. Lievens F, Buyse T, Sackett PR. The operational validity of a video-based situational judgment test for medical college admissions: illustrating the importance of matching predictor and criterion construct domains. J Appl Psychol 2005;90:442-52.
20. Lievens F, Sackett PR. Video-based versus written situational judgement tests: a comparison in terms of predictive validity. J Appl Psychol 2006;91:1181-8.
21. Stemler SE, Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko EL, Jarvin L, Sharpes K. Using the theory of successful intelligence as a framework for developing assessments in AP physics. Contemp Educ Psychol 2009;34:195-209.
22. Stemler S, Grigorenko E, Jarvin L, Sternberg R. Using the theory of successful intelligence as a basis for augmenting AP exams in psychology and statistics. Contemp Educ Psychol 2006;31:344-76.
23. Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004;38:314-26.
24. Salvatori P. Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2001;6:159-75.
25. Benbassat J, Baumal R. Uncertainties in the selection of applicants for medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007;12:509-21.
26. McGaghie WC. Student selection. In: Norman GR, van dVC, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education, 1st edn. Dordrecht: Boston, MA: London: Kluwer 2002;303.
27. Duckworth AL, Seligman ME. Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychol Sci 2005;16:939-44.
28. Hulsman RL, Ende J, Mourer I, Boonman JH, Griffioen FMM. In zulke waters vangt men zulke visschen. Een evaluatie van de decentrale selectie van geneeskundestudenten in het AMC-UvA. [In such waters, man catches such fish. An evaluation of the decentralised selection of medical students at the AMC UvA]. TMO 2005;24:15.
29. Urlings-Strop L, Stegers-Jager K, Stijnen T, Themmen APN. Academic and non-academic selection criteria in predicting medical school performance. Med Teach 2013;35:497-502.
30. Hulsman RL, van der Ende JSJ, Oort FJ, Michels RPJ, Casteelen G, Griffioen FMM. Effectiveness of selection in medical school admissions: evaluation of the outcomes among freshmen. Med Educ 2007;41:369-77.
31. Dekker JA, Lambregts MMC, Heeren MW, Hanemaayer JI. Toelating tot de medische opleiding in beweging. Capaciteit en legitimiteit. [Admission to medical school in movement. Capacity and legitimacy]. TMO 2009;28:159-66.