A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 519, Issue PC, 2014, Pages 2571-2583

  Young, Robert ^a   Zanders, Julie ^b   Lieberknecht, Katherine ^a   Fassman Beck, Elizabeth ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c Stevens Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Green infrastructure; Stormwater management; Typology; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

URBAN PLANNING;

CURRENT LEVELS; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONS; PRESENT STAGE; STORM-WATER MANAGEMENTS; TYPOLOGY; URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE;

ECOLOGY;

STORMWATER; TYPOLOGY; URBAN PLANNING; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

AUCKLAND; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND;

EID: 84912057946     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.048     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abernathy, Chip., 2013. The Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Program. (retrieved 03.05.14). http://www.acectx.org/texas_cec_chapters/documents/EAA-ACECHCPPresentation.pdf.
2. Ahern J. Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape urban plan. 1995, 33(1):131-155.
3. Anthes Richard A., Corell Robert W., Holland Greg., Hurrell James W., MacCracken Michael C., Trenberth Kevin E. Hurricanes and global warming-potential linkages and consequences. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2006, 87:623-628.
4. Auckland Council, 2011. Draft City Centre Masterplan. Released for public consultation September 2011.
5. Auckland Council, 2012a. Long-term Plan 2012-2022, Volumes 1-5. (retrieved 05.07.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/planspoliciesprojects/plansstrategies/Long_term_plan/Pages/documents.aspx.
6. Auckland Council, 2012b. The Auckland Plan. Published March 2012. (retrieved 17.07.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/planspoliciesprojects/plansstrategies/theaucklandplan/Pages/theaucklandplan.aspx.
7. Auckland Council, 2012c. City Centre Masterplan. (retrieved 05.07.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/planspoliciesprojects/plansstrategies/ccmp/Pages/documents.aspx.
8. Auckland Council, 2013a. Draft Parks & Open Spaces Strategic Action Plan. Released for public consultation May 2013. (retrieved 29.07.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/AboutCouncil/HaveYourSay/Documents/draftparksopenspacestrategicactionplan.pdf.
9. Auckland Council, 2013b. Auckland Unitary Plan stormwater management provisions: Technical basis of contaminant and volume management requirements, Prepared by Auckland Council. Auckland Council technical report, TR2013/035. (retrieved 01.10.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/en/planspoliciesprojects/reports/technicalpublications/Pages/home.aspx.
10. Auckland Council, 2013c. Top and bottom sites across Auckland for freshwater, marine, air quality and terrestrial reporting areas (2013). (accessed 27.09.13). http://www.stateofauckland.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/.
11. Auckland Regional Council, 2003. Stormwater Management Devices: Design Guidelines Manual. Technical Publication 10 (retrieved 01.09.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/planspoliciesprojects/reports/technicalpublications/Pages/home.aspx.
12. American Water Works Association Protecting the source: conserving forests to protect water. Opflow 2004, 30(5):1-7.
13. BBC Research and Consulting, 2003. SAWS Water Conservation Savings. Denver, Colorado: BBC Research and Consulting.
14. Benedict M., McMahon E. Green infrastructure: Linking landscapes and communities 2006, Island Press, Washington, DC.
15. Borne K., Fassman E.A., Tanner C.C. Floating treatment wetland retrofit to improve stormwater pond performance for sediment, copper and zinc. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 54:173-182. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.01.031.
16. Borne K., Fassman E., Tanner C. Stormwater nitrogen removal performance of a floating treatment wetland. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 68(7):1657-1664.
17. Borne K., Fassman-Beck E., Tanner C. Floating treatment wetland influences fate of metals in road stormwater retention ponds. Water Res. 2014, 48(1):430-442.
18. Boston Consulting Group, 2004. Auckland regional stormwater project and action plan to deliver improved stormwater outcomes. Final report for the Auckland Regional Council and Infrastructure Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand.
19. Brown R. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Sci. 2000, 46(2):240-247.
20. City of San Antonio, 2014. "City Council A Session." (retrieved 04.03.14). http://www.legistar.granicus.com/sanantonio/meetings/2014/1/1029_A_City_Council_A_Session_14-01-09_AGENDA.pdf.
21. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Naeem S., Limburg K., Paruelo J., O'Neill R., Raskin R., Sutton P., Van Den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
22. City South Management Area, 2012. Annual Strategic Plan, 2012-13. City South Mangement Area: San Antonio, TX.
23. Davies, C., MacFarlane, R., McGloin, C., Roe, M., 2006. Green Infrastructure Planning Guide. North-East Community Forests, Durham, Marea Britanie. (retrieved 30.09.13). http://www.aughty.org/pdf/green_infrastruct_planguide.pdf.
24. De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41(3):393-408.
25. De Sousa M., Montalto F., Sabrina S. Using life cycle assessment to evaluate green and grey combined sewer overflow control strategies. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16(6):901-913. Special Issue: Sustainable Urban Systems.
26. Department of Internal Affairs, 2011. "Auckland Spatial Plan Government Position Papers: Overview" published by the Department of Internal Affairs, New Zealand Government. (retrieved 19.08.13). http://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/AKCab00Overview/$file/AKCab00Overview.pdf.
27. Dobbs C., Escobedo F., Zipperer W. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape Urban Plann. 2011, 99(3-4):196-206. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204610002793.
28. Dow K. Social dimensions of gradients in urban ecosystems. Urban Ecosyst. 2000, 4(4):255-275.
29. Dunn A. Siting green infrastructure: legal and policy solutions to alleviate urban poverty and promote healthy communities. Environ. Affairs 2010, 37(41):41-66.
30. Dunnett N., Swanwick C., Woolley H. Improving Urban Parks, Play Areas, and Open Space 2002, Department of Transport Local Government and Regions, London.
31. European Environment Agency, 2011. Green Infrastructure and Territorial Cohesion. Technical report number 18/2011. (retrieved 30.09.11). http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/green-infrastructure-and-territorial-cohesion.
32. Environmental Defense Society, 2013. Media Release: "Government's announcement on RMA reforms are troubling", 10 August 2013. (retrieved 12.08.13). http://www.eds.org.nz/content/documents/pressreleases/130810%20RMA%20reforms%20PR.pdf.
33. Fassman E.A., Blackbourn S. Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2010, 15(6):475-485.
34. Fassman E.A., Blackbourn S. Runoff water quality mitigation by permeable pavement. J. Irrig. Drain. 2011, 137(11):720-729.
35. Fassman E.A., Simcock R. Moisture measurements as performance criteria for extensive living roof substrates'. J. Environ. Eng. 2012, 138(8):841-851.
36. Fassman, E.A., Simcock, R., Wang, S., 2013. Bioretention Media Specification' Auckland UniServices Technical Report to Auckland Council. Auckland Council TR2013/011. Auckland, New Zealand. (accessed 14.03.2014). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/en/planspoliciesprojects/reports/technicalpublications/Pages/home.aspx.
37. Fassman-Beck E.A., Simcock R., Voyde E.A., Hong Y.S. 4 Living roofs in 3 locations: does configuration affect runoff mitigation?. J. Hydrol. 2013, 490(2013):11-20.
38. Freudenburg W. Beyond the nature/society divide: learning to think like a mountain. Sociol. Forum 1995, 10(3):361-392.
39. Geddes P. Cities in Evolution: An Introduction to the Town Planning Movement and to the Study of Civics 1915, Williams and Norgate, London.
40. Gibson, A., 2013. "Tree protection rules axed in rethink by Auckland Council", The New Zealand Herald, January 22, 2013. (retrieved 13.08.13). http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3%26objectid=10860552.
41. Goldman M., Schurman R. Closing the "great divide": new social theory on society and nature. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2000, 26:563-584.
42. Gray, Roger, 2013. "San Antonio should pay for the land it 'took' in City South." San Antonio Express News, December 12, 2013. (retrieved 03.05.14). http://www.mysanantonio.com/default/article/San-Antonio-should-pay-for-the-land-it-took-in-5059214.php.
43. Griffon M. Marcel Mazoyer and Laurence Roudart: a history of world agriculture from the Neolithic age to the current crisis. Human Ecol. 2008, 36(4):609-610.
44. Gunther, Abraham, 2014. Personal communication. Chief of Forestry, Horticulture, and Natural Resources for the New York City Parks Department.
45. Harris R., Sleight P., Webber R. Geodemographics: Neighbourhood Targeting and GIS 2005, Wiley, Chichester.
46. Hauraki Gulf Forum, 2011. State of Our Gulf Report. Auckland Council. (accessed 01.10.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/AboutCouncil/representativesbodies/haurakigulfforum/Pages/home.aspx.
47. Hermitte, Sam Marie, Mace, Robert E., 2012. The grass is always greener..outdoor residential water use in Texas. Texas Water Development Board: Technical Note 12-01. (retrieved 03.05.14). https://www.twdb.state.tx.us/publications/reports/technical_notes/doc/SeasonalWaterUseReport-final.pdf.
48. Hoppe, R., MacDonald, J., 2013. The revised ERS farm typology: Classifying U.S. farms to reflect today's agriculture. http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2013-may/the-revised-ers-farm-typology-classifying-us-farms-to-reflect-todays-agriculture.aspx#.UvqjGvaiRAe.
49. Hoppe, R., Perry, J., Banker, D., 2000. ERS farm typology for a diverse agricultural sector. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. (AIB-759) September.
50. Lieberknecht Katherine Public access to U.S. conservation land trust properties: results from a national survey. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2009, 75(4):479-491.
51. Linnaeus C. Systema naturae, sive regna tria naturae systematice proposita per classes, ordines, genera, & species 1735, Haak, Leiden.
52. Lopez C., Valino J., Perez M. Typology, classification and characterization of farms for agricultural production planning. Spanish J. Agric. Res. 2008, 1:125-136.
53. Lupton, R., Fenton, A., Tunstall, R., Harris, R., 2011. Place typologies and their policy applications: a report prepared for the Department of Communities and Local Government. http://www.eprints.lse.ac.uk/43805/1/CASEreport65.pdf.
54. Madden, S., 2010. Choosing green over gray: Philadelphia's innovative stormwater infrastructure plan. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning: MIT.
55. Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ. Geogr. 1996, 72(3):293-313.
56. Mazoyer M., Roudart L. A History of World Agriculture 2006, Monthly Review Press, New York.
57. McHarg I. Design With Nature 1992, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
58. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
59. Mell I. Can green infrastructure promote urban sustainability?. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2009, 162(March):23-34. (ES1).
60. Mell, I.C., 2010. Green infrastructure: concepts, perceptions and its use in spatial planning.
61. Mell I.C. Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? Examining the "green" of Green Infrastructure development. Local Environment 2013, 18(2):152-166.
62. Ministry for the Environment, 2013. "Improving our resource management system. A discussion document". Wellington: Ministry for the Environment, February 2013. (retrieved 12.08.13). http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/rma/improving-our-resource-management-system-discussion-document.pdf.
63. Moravec, Eva Ruth, 2013. "City South's days are numbered." San Antonio Express News, November 13, 2013. (retrieved 04.03.14). http://www.expressnews.com/news/local/article/City-South-s-days-are-numbered-4981829.php#/0.
64. Mumford L. The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects 1961, MJF Press, New York.
65. Naumann, S., Davis, M., Kaphengst, T., Mav Pieterse, M., and Rayment, M., 2011. Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Contract no. 070307/2010/577182/ETU/F.1, Ecologic institute and GHK Consulting.
66. National Science Foundation, 2012. Greening of Cities International Workshop on Green Urban Infrastructure. Auckland: New Zealand. http://www.greeningofcities.org/workshop/about-workshop/.
67. New York City Green Infrastructure Update. City of New York, 2011.
68. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 2013. Combined sewer overflow. (retrived 31.08.13). http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/48595.html.
69. Park R., Burgess E., McKenzie R. The City 1925, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
70. Pauleit S., Slinn P., Handley J., Lindley S. Promoting the natural greenstructures of towns and cities: English natures accessible natural greenspace standards model. Built Enviro. 2003, 29(2):157-170.
71. Peterson T., Stott P., Herring S. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2012, 93(7):1041-1067.
72. Pickering A. Further beyond the nature/society divide: a comment on Freudenburg, Frickel, and Gramling. Sociol. Forum 1996, 11(1):153-159.
73. Pires R. Watershed protection for a world city: the case of New York. Land Use Policy 2004, 21(2):161-175.
74. Place Paula Syptak Zoning of the south side. San Antonio Bus. J. 2004, 1. November 14, 2004 http://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/2004/11/15/focus1.html (retrieved 31.08.13).
75. PlaNYC: A Greener, Greater New York. City of New York, 2007.
76. Pötz H., Bleuze P. Urban Green-blue Grids for Sustainable and Dynamic Cities 2012, Coop for Life, Delft.
77. Redman C., Grove J., Kuby L. Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 2004, 7:161-171.
78. San Antonio Water System, 2014. Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program. (retrieved 03.05.14). https://www.saws.org/environment/ResourceProtComp/aquifer_protection/acquisition.cfm.
79. Texas Forest Service, 2012. Drought takes toll on urban forest, millions of trees dead, Texas A and M. (retrieved 23.09.13). http://www.texasforestservice.tamu.edu/main/popup.aspx?id=15126.
80. Texas Living Waters, 2014. Case study: Water conservation in San Antonio. (retrieved 03.06.14). http://www.texaslivingwaters.org/water-conservation/san-antonio-case-study/.
81. Trenberth K. Framing the way to relate climate extremes to climate change. Clim. Change 2012, 115:283-290.
82. Turak E., Koop K. Multi-attribute ecological river typology for assessing ecological condition and conservation planning. Hydrobiologia 2008, 603:83-104.
83. Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Ylipelkonen, V., Kazmierczak, A. Niemela, J., James, P., 2007. Conceptual framework integrating Green Infrastructure, ecosystem and human health. http://www.usir.salford.ac.uk/9497/1/Tzoulas_et_al_2007.pdf.
84. United States Congress, 1999. House of Representatives bill 828. (retrieved 31.08.13). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-106hr828rh/pdf/BILLS-106hr828rh.pdf.
85. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. Greening EPA Glossary. http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/glossary.htm#g.
86. USEPA, 2013. National pollutant discharge elimination system: Combined sewer overflows CSO control policy. (retrieved 31.08.13). http://www.cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/cso/cpolicy.cfm?program_id=5.
87. Vujičić, T., 2011. Urban and architectural typology of industrial structures versus their photographic typology - a comparative analysis. http://www.academia.edu/3859022/Vujicic_Tijana_URBAN_AND_ARCHITECTURAL_TYPOLOGY_OF_INDUSTRIAL_STRUCTURES_VERSUS_THEIR_PHOTOGRAPHIC_TYPOLOGY_A_COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_EN.
88. Waitemata Local Board, 2013. Draft Ponsonby Road Masterplan. Released for public consultation July 2013. (retrieved 29.07.13). http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/planspoliciesprojects/plansstrategies/Councilstrategies/Pages/draftponsonbyroadmasterplan.aspx.
89. Watercare Services, Ltd., 20120. Central Interceptor Main Project Works. Resource Consent Applications and Assessment of Effects on the Environment. Part A-AEE Report. (accessed 14.03.14). http://www.watercare.co.nz/about-watercare/projects/central-interceptor/Pages/default.aspx.
90. Watercare Services Ltd., 2012. Central Interceptor Main Project Works Resource Consent Applications and Assessment of Effects on the Environment. August. (retrieved 28.09.13). http://www.watercare.co.nz/about-watercare/projects/central-interceptor/Pages/default.aspx.
91. Waterfront Auckland, 2012. The Waterfront Plan 2012. Published August 2012. (retrieved 17.07.13). http://www.waterfrontauckland.co.nz/getmedia/68b631ad-87ef-4501-b8cc-3083698b70da/39347-WAKL-Waterfront-Plan_Y.pdf.aspx.
92. Wise, S., 2008. Green infrastructure rising: Best practices in stormwater management. Planning, American Planning Association, August/September. http://www.kcmo.org/idc/groups/water/documents/waterservices/greeninferstruc.pdf.
93. Wright, J., 2013. Improving our resource management system: A discussion document, Submission to the Minister for the Environment by Dr Jan Wright, Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, 2 April 2013. (retrieved 12.08.13). http://www.pce.parliament.nz/assets/Uploads/PCE-MfE-RMA-DiscussionDocumentfinal.pdf.
94. Young R. Interdisciplinary foundations of urban ecology. Urban Ecosyst. 2009, 12(3):311-331.
95. Young R. The greening of Chicago: environmental leaders and organizational change. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2010, 53(8):1051-1068.
96. Young R. Planting the living city. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2011, 77(4):368-381.
97. Zook M. Hubs, nodes and by-passed places: a typology of e-commerce regions in the United States. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2002, 93(5):509-521.