Public access to U.S. conservation land trust properties: Results from a national survey

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 479-491

  Lieberknecht, Katherine ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Conservation easements; Land conservation; Land trusts; Public access

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND RIGHTS; PUBLIC ACCESS; SURVEY; URBAN AREA;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70350623336     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360903212087     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Brewer, R. (2003). Conservancy. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
2. Cheever, F. (1996). Public good and private magic in the law of land trusts and conservation easements: A happy present and a troubled future. Denver University Law Review, 73(4), 1077-1102.
3. Cole, D., & Landres, P. (1996). Threats to wilderness ecosystems: Impacts and research needs. Ecological Applications, 6(1), 168-184.
4. Czaja, R., & Blair, J. (2005). Designing surveys: A guide to decisions and procedures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
5. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Dwyer, J. F. (1993). Outdoor recreation participation: An update on Blacks, Whites, Hispanics, and Asians in Illinois. In P. H. Gobster (Ed.), Managing urban and high-use recreation settings: Selected papers from the Urban Forestry and Ethnic Minorities and the Environment paper sessions at the fourth North American Symposium on Society and Resource Management; 1992 May 17-20 (pp. 119-121). St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.
7. Dwyer, J. F. (1994). Customer diversity and the future demand for outdoor recreation. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Range and Experiment Station.
8. Dwyer, J. F., & Hutchison, R. (1990). Outdoor recreation participation and preferences for Black and White Chicago households. In J. Vining (Ed.), Social science and natural resource recreation management (pp. 49-67). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9. Fairfax, S. K., Gwin, L., King, M. A., Raymond, L., & Watt, L. A. (2005). Buying nature: The limits of land acquisition as a conservation strategy, 1780-2004. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act. Public Law 104-127 (1996).
11. Foddy, W. (1993). Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act. Public Law 101-624 (1990).
13. Foti, P. E., & Jacobs, H. M. (1989). Private public-interest land use planning: Land trusts in the Upper Midwest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 44(4), 317-319.
14. Hammit, W. E., & Cole, D. N. (1987). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce. New York: HarperCollins.
16. Jacobs, H. M. (2000). The ambiguous role of private voluntary methods in public land use policy: A comment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 424-425.
17. Kaid Benfield, F., Raimi, M. F., & Chen, D. D. T. (1999). Once there were greenfields: How urban sprawl is undermining America's environment, economy and social fabric. New York: Natural Resources Defense Council.
18. Kuss, F. R., Graefe, A. R., & Vaske, J. J. (1990). Visitor impact management: A review of research. Washington, DC: National Parks and Conservation Association.
19. Land Trust Alliance. (2003). 2003 Land trust census. Retrieved February 6, 2005, from http://www.ltanet.org/attached-files/0/ 47/4775/Exchange_24_01_05.doc
20. Land Trust Alliance. (2006). The 2005 national land trust survey report. Washington, DC: Land Trust Alliance.
21. Land Trust Alliance. (2009a). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://www.landtrustalliance.org/conserve/ faqs/faq-land-trusts
22. Land Trust Alliance. (2009b). Land Trust Alliance fact sheet Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://www.landtrustalliance.org/ conserve/documents/landowners.pdf
23. Lieberknecht, K. (2008) Private land conservation and equity: U.S. conservation land trusts, public access, and perpetuity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
24. Lindsey, G., Maraj, M., & Kuan, S. (2001). Access, equity, and urban greenways: An exploratory investigation. The Professional Geographer, 53(3), 332-346.
25. Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
26. Mahoney, J. D. (2002). Perpetual restrictions on land and the problem of the future. Virginia Law Review, 88(4), 739-787.
27. Mahoney, J. D. (2004). The illusion of perpetuity and the preservation of privately owned lands. Natural Resources Journal, 44, 573-600.
28. Merenlander, A. M., Huntsinger, L., Guthey, G., & Fairfax, S. K. (2004). Land trusts and conservation easements: Who is conserving what for whom? Conservation Biology, 18(1), 65-75.
29. Morisette, P. M. (2001). Conservation easements and the public good: Preserving the environment on private lands. Natural Resources Journal, 41(2), 373-426.
30. NeighborSpace. (2009). Mission. Retrieved July 26, 2009, from http://neighbor-space.org/mission.htm
31. Pergams, O. R. W., Czech, B., Haney, J. C., & Nyberg. D. (2004). Linkage of conservation activity to trends in the U.S. economy. Conservation Biology, 18(2), 1617-1623.
32. Pergams, O. R. W., & Zaradic, P. A. (2006). Is love of nature in the United States becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management, 80(4), 387-393.
33. Pfeffer, M. J., & Lapping, M. (1994). Farmland preservation, development rights and the theory of the growth machine: The views of planners. Journal of Rural Studies, 10(3), 233-248.
34. Press, D. (2002). Saving open space: The politics of land preservation in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35. Qualified Conservation Contributions Act. Public Law 96-541, 26 U.S.C. (1980).
36. Raymond, L., & Fairfax, S. K. (2002). The "shift to privatization" in land conservation: A cautionary essay. Natural Resources Journal, 42(3), 599-639.
37. Scott, D., & Munson, W. (1994). Perceived constraints to park usage among individuals with low incomes. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 12(4), 79-96.
38. Trust for Public Land. (2009). LandVote records from the trust for public land. Retrieved February 26, 2009, from http://tpl.org/ tier3_cd.cfm?content_item_id=12010&folder_id=2386
39. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (2009). The Land and Water Conservation Fund and your national forests. Retrieved July 26, 2009, from http://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/LWCF/index.shtml.
40. Washburne, R. F. (1978). Black under-participation in wildland recreation: Alternative explanations. Leisure Sciences, 1 (3), 175-189.
41. West, P. C. (1989). Urban region parks and black minorities: Subculture, marginality, and interracial relations in park use in the Detroit metropolitan area. Leisure Sciences, 11(1), 11-28.
42. Zaradic, P.A., & Pergams, O. R. (2007). Videophilia: Implications for childhood development and conservation. Journal of Developmental Processes, 2(1), 130-144.