Urban containment policies and urban growth

International Journal of Urban Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 309-326

  Woo, Myungje ^a   Guldmann, Jean Michel ^b  

^a University of Seoul   (South Korea)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

growth management; sprawl; urban containment policy; urban growth boundary; urban service area

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912041472     PISSN: 12265934     EISSN: 21616779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.893198     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alperovich, G. (1983). An empirical study of population density gradients and their determinants. Journal of Regional Science, 23(4), 529–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1983.tb01008.x
2. Anas, A. (1999). The costs and benefits of fragmented metropolitan governance and the new regionalist policies. Planning and Markets, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www-pam.usc.edu/volume2/v2i1a2s1.html
3. Aytur, S. A., Rodriguez, D. A., Evenson, K. R., & Catellier, D. J. (2008). Urban containment policies and physical activity: A time-series analysis of metropolitan areas, 1990–2002. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(4), 320–332. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.018
4. Balchin, P. N., Isaac, D., & Chen, J. (2001). Urban economics: A global perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Boarnet, M. G. (1994). The monocentric model and employment location. Journal of Urban Economics, 36, 79–97. doi: 10.1006/juec.1994.1027
6. Brueckner, J. K. (1990). Growth controls and land values in an open city. Land Economics, 66(3), 237–248. doi: 10.2307/3146726
7. Brueckner, J. K. (1995). Strategic control of growth in a system of cities. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 393–416. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(95)80003-R
8. Brueckner, J. K. (2000). Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International, Regional, Science Review, 23(2), 160–171. doi: 10.1177/016001700761012710
9. Brueckner, J. K. (2001). Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 65–97. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/25058783?uid=3738256&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21103518018137 doi: 10.1353/urb.2001.0003
10. Carlino, G. A., & Mills, E. S. (1987). The determinants of county growth. Journal of Regional Science, 27(1), 39–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1987.tb01143.x
11. Carlson, T., & Dierwechter, Y. (2007). Effects of urban growth boundaries on residential development in Pierce County, Washington. The Professional Geographer, 59(2), 209–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00608.x
12. Carruthers, J. I. (2002). The impacts of state growth management programmes: A comparative analysis. Urban Studies, 39(11), 1959–1982. doi: 10.1080/0042098022000011317
13. Cox, W. (2000). The anti-sprawl war on the suburbs: False diagnosis, hopeless policies. A Quarterly Publication of Public Policy in Texas, 1(1), 18–31.
14. Ding, C., Knaap, G. J., & Hopkins, L. D. (1999). Managing urban growth with urban growth boundaries: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 53–68. doi: 10.1006/juec.1998.2111
15. Dong, H., & Gliebe, J. (2012). Assessing the impacts of smart growth policies on home developers in a bi-state metropolitan area: Evidence from the Portland metropolitan area. Urban Studies, 49(10), 2219–2235. doi: 10.1177/0042098011422575
16. Eijck, K. V., & Graaf, P. M. D. (1995). The effects of family structure on the educational attainment of siblings in Hungary. European Sociological Review, 11, 273–292.
17. Ewing, R. H. (1994). Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review. Environmental and Urban Issues, 21(2), 1–15.
18. Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., & Harrison, A. (2001). Who sprawls most? How growth patterns differ across the U.S.A. Discussion paper prepared for The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
19. Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S., & Freihage, J. (2001). Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 681–717. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426
20. Gerber, E. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2004). Growth management policy in California communities (Policy Report No. 2; pp. 1–7). Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy in University of Michigan.
21. Harries, K. (2006). Property crimes and violence in United State: An analysis of the influence of population density. International Journal of Criminal Justice Science, 1(2), 24–34.
22. Kleismit, T. (2003). Ohio's first suburbs; rethinking investment strategies for a more competitive city. Ohio First Suburbs Consortium.
23. Kolakowski, K., Machemer, P., Thomas, J., & Hamlin, R. (2000). Urban growth boundaries. A policy brief for the Michigan legislature. Michigan State University. Retrieved from http://www.greaterlansingurbanservice.org/
24. Landis, J. D., Deng, L., & Reilly, M. (2002). Growth management revisited: A reassessment of its efficacy, price effects, and impacts on metropolitan growth patterns. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper. Retrieved from http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=iurd
25. Levine, N. (1999). The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California. Urban Studies, 36(12), 2047–2068. doi: 10.1080/0042098992539
26. McGranahan, D. A. (1999). Natural amenities drive rural population change (Agricultural Economic Report No. 781). Washington, DC: Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
27. Metropolitan Council. (2006). Metropolitan urban service area. Retrieved from http://metrocouncil.org
28. Mills, E. S., & Hamilton, B. W. (1989). Urban economics (4th ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
29. Nelson, A. C., Burdy, R. J., Feser, E., Dawkins, C. J., Malizia, E., & Quercia, R. (2004). Urban containment and central-city revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 411–425. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976391
30. Nelson, A. C., & Dawkins, C. J. (2004). Urban containment in the United States: History, models, and techniques for regional and metropolitan growth management (PAS Report No. 520). American Planning Association.
31. Nelson, A. C., & Peterman, D. R. (2000). Does growth management matter? The effect of growth management on economic performance. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), 277–285. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900307
32. O'Toole, R. (2003). San Jose demonstrates the limits of urban growth boundaries and urban rail (Policy Study No. 309). Reason Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.reason.org/ps309.pdf
33. O'Toole, R. (2007). The planning tax: The case against regional growth-management planning (Policy Analysis No. 606). CATO Institute.
34. Paulsen, K. (2013). The effects of growth management on the spatial extent of urban development, revisited. Land Economics, 89(2), 193–210.
35. Pendall, R., Martin, J., & Fulton, W. (2002). Holding the line: urban containment in the United States. A discussion paper prepared for The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
36. Phillips, J., & Goodstein, E. (2000). Growth management and housing prices: The case of Portland, Oregon. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3), 334–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2000.tb00030.x
37. Rodriguez, D. A., Targa, F., & Aytur, S. A. (2006). Transport implications of urban containment policies: A study of the largest twenty-five US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1879–1897. doi: 10.1080/00420980600838127
38. Seaver, D., Morris, B., & Rapson, R. (1998). Old suburbs in new times: Repositioning post-WWII suburbia. The commissioner (Summer). The American Planning Association.
39. Staley, S. R., Edgens, J. G., & Milder, G. C. S. (1999). A line in the land: Urban-growth boundaries, smart growth, and housing affordability (Policy Study No. 263). Reason Public Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.rppi.org/urban/ps263.html
40. Steinnes, D. N. (1977). Causality and intraurban location. Journal of Urban Economics, 4, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(77)90031-6
41. Stone, B.Jr, Mednick, A. C., Holloway, T., & Spak, S. N. (2007). Is compact growth good for air quality? Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(4), 404–418. doi: 10.1080/01944360708978521
42. Turnbull, G. K. (2004). Urban growth controls: Transitional dynamics of development fees and growth boundaries. Journal of Urban Economics, 55, 215–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2003.10.001
43. Wassmer, R. W. (2006). The influence of local urban containment policies and statewide growth management on the size of United States urban areas. Journal of Regional Science, 46(1), 25–65. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2006.00432.x
44. Weitz, J., & Moore, T. (1998). Development inside urban growth boundaries. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(4), 424–441. doi: 10.1080/01944369808976002
45. Woo, M., & Guldmann, M.-J. (2011). Impacts of urban containment policies on the spatial structure of U.S. Metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 48(16), 3504–3529. doi: 10.1177/0042098011399594