Polyethersulfone membrane enhanced with iron oxide nanoparticles for copper removal from water: Application of new functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 263, Issue , 2015, Pages 101-112

  Ghaemi, Negin ^a   Madaeni, Sayed S ^b   Daraei, Parisa ^a   Rajabi, Hamid ^b   Zinadini, Sirus ^b   Alizadeh, Abdolhamid ^b   Heydari, Rouhollah ^c   Beygzadeh, Mojtaba ^d   Ghouzivand, Sohrab ^b  

^a KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c LORESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d MATERIALS AND ENERGY RESEARCH CENTER   (Iran)

Author keywords

Copper ion removal; Functionalized Fe3O4; Heavy metal; Iron oxide nanoparticles; Nano enhanced membrane

Indexed keywords

COPPER; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; HEAVY METALS; HYDROPHILICITY; IRON; IRON OXIDES; METAL IONS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PORE SIZE; REUSABILITY; SILICA;

COPPER ADSORPTION; COPPER ION REMOVALS; FUNCTIONALIZED; IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; MODIFIED SILICA; POLYETHERSULFONE MEMBRANE; POROSITY MEASUREMENT; WATER CONTACT ANGLE;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

EID: 84912036331     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.103     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Eck P.C., Wilson L. Copper Toxicity 1989, Eck Institute of Applied Nutrition and Bioenergetics, Ltd.
2. Reichman S.M. The Responses of Plants to Metal Toxicity: A review focusing on Copper, Manganese and Zinc 2002, Australian Minerals & Energy Environment Foundation, Melbourne.
3. Garcia-Leston J., Mendez J., Pasaro E., Laffon B. Genotoxic effects of lead: an updated review. Environ. Int. 2010, 36:623-636.
4. Hua M., Zhang S., Pan B., Zhang W., Lv L., Zhang Q. Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 211-212:317-331.
5. Ona S., Toorisaka E., Hirata M., Hano T. Adsorption and toxicity of heavy metals on activated sludge. Sci. Asia. 2010, 36:204-209.
6. Ren Z., Zhang W., Meng H., Liu J., Wang S. Extraction separation of Cu(II) and Co(II) from sulfuric solutions by hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365:260-268.
7. Ku Y., Chen S., Wang W. Effect of solution composition on the removal of copper ions by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 43:135-142.
8. Tizaoui C., Rachmawati S.D., Hilal N. The removal of copper in water using manganese activated saturated and unsaturated sand filters. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 209:334-344.
9. AbuDalo M.A., Nevostrueva S., Hernandez M.T. Enhanced copper (II) removal from acidic water by granular activated carbon impregnated with carboxybenzotriazole. APCBEE Proc. 2013, 5:64-68.
10. SenthilKumar P., Ramalingam S., Sathyaselvabala V., Dinesh Kirupha S., Sivanesan S. Removal of copper (II) ions from aqueous solution by adsorption using cashew nut shell. Desalination 2011, 266:63-71.
11. Aydin H., Bulut Y., Yerlikaya Ç. Removal of copper (II) from aqueous solution by adsorption onto low-cost adsorbents. J. Environ. Manage. 2008, 87:37-45.
12. Jasiewicz K., Pietrzak R. The influence of pore generating agent on the efficiency of copper and iron ions removal from liquid phase by polyethersulfone membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 228:449-454.
13. Magnenet C., Jurin F.E., Lakard S., Buron C.C., Lakard B. Polyelectrolyte modification of ultrafiltration membrane for removal of copper ions. Colloids Surf. A 2013, 435:170-177.
14. Liu C., Bai R. Adsorptive removal of copper ions with highly porous chitosan/cellulose acetate blend hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:313-322.
15. Han W., Liu C., Bai R. A novel method to prepare high chitosan content blend hollow fiber membranes using a non-acidic dope solvent for highly enhanced adsorptive performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 302:150-159.
16. Boricha A.G., Murthy Z.V.P. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/chitosan blend membranes: preparation, characterization and performance for the separation of heavy metals. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 339:239-249.
17. Cheng Z., Liu X., Han M., Ma W. Adsorption kinetic character of copper ions onto a modified chitosan transparent thin membrane from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182:408-415.
18. 4 nanoparticles with enhanced performance for Cu(II) removal from water. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:250-259.
19. Ng L.Y., Mohammad A.W., Leo C.P., Hilal N. Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review. Desalination 2013, 308:15-33.
20. Sabbatini P., Yrazu F., Rossi F., Thern G., Marajofsky A., Fidalgo de Cortalezzi M.M. Fabrication and characterization of iron oxide ceramic membranes for arsenic removal. Water Res. 2010, 44:5702-5712.
21. Park H., Choi H. As(III) removal by hybrid reactive membrane process combined with ozonation. Water Res. 2011, 45:1933-1940.
22. Gholami A., Moghadassi A.R., Hosseini S.M., Shabani S., Gholami F. Preparation and characterization of polyvinyl chloride based nanocomposite nanofiltration-membrane modified by iron oxide nanoparticles for lead removal from water. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20:1517-1522.
23. Xu G.R., Wang J.N., Li C.J. Preparation of hierarchically nanofibrous membrane and its high adaptability in hexavalent chromium removal from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 198-199:310-317.
24. Li C.J., Li Y.J., Wang J.N., Cheng J. PA6 at FexOy nanofibrous membrane preparation and its strong Cr(VI)-removal performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220:294-301.
25. Weerasekara N.A., Choo K.H., Choi S.J. Metal oxide enhanced microfiltration for the selective removal of Co and Sr ions from nuclear laundry wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 447:87-95.
26. Yang D., Hu J., Fu S. Controlled synthesis of magnetite-silica nanocomposites via a seeded sol-gel approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113:7646-7651.
27. Stöber W., Fink A., Bohn E. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1968, 26:62-69.
28. 4 nanoparticle-supported copper (I) pybox catalyst: magnetically recoverable catalyst for enantioselective direct-addition of terminal alkynes to imines. Org. Lett. 2011, 13:442-445.
29. Jang J.H., Lim H.B. Characterization and analytical application of surface modified magnetic nanoparticles. Microchem. J. 2010, 94:148-158.
30. Daraei P., Madaeni S.S., Ghaemi N., Ahmadi Monfared H., Khadivi M.A. Fabrication of PES nanofiltration membrane by simultaneous use of multi-walled carbon nanotube and surface graft polymerization method: comparison of MWCNT and PAA modified MWCNT. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 104:32-34.
31. Ghaemi N., Madaeni S.S., Alizadeh A., Rajabi H., Daraei P. Preparation, characterization and performance of polyethersulfone/organically modified montmorillonite nanocomposite membranes in removal of pesticides. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 382:135-147.
32. 2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255:4725-4732.
33. 2) ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Desalination 2011, 273:85-92.
34. 2 magnetic nanoparticles: an efficient heterogeneous organosuperbase catalyst for various organic transformations in aqueous media. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33(8):2546-2552.
35. 2 nanoparticles on fouling mitigation of ultrafiltration membranes for activated sludge filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 249:1-8.
36. 2 embedded mixed matrix PES nanocomposite membranes: influence of different sizes and types of nanoparticles on antifouling and performance. Desalination 2012, 292:19-29.
37. Daraei P., Madaeni S.S., Ghaemi N., Khadivi M.A., Astinchap B., Moradian R. Enhancing antifouling capability of PES membrane via mixing with various types of polymer modified multi-walled carbon nanotube. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 444:184-191.