A serious game for introducing set-based concurrent engineering in industrial practices

Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 333-346

  Kerga, Endris ^a   Rossi, Monica ^a   Taisch, Marco ^a   Terzi, Sergio ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

lean product development; point based concurrent engineering; serious gaming; set based concurrent engineering

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DESIGN;

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICES; LEAN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; POINT-BASED; PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; SERIOUS GAMING; SET BASED CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES;

SERIOUS GAMES;

EID: 84912030106     PISSN: 1063293X     EISSN: 15312003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X14550104     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Al-Ashaab A, Golob M, Attia UM, et al. The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering - a case study from an aerospace industry. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2013 ; 21 (4). 268-285
2. Al-Ashaab A, Shehab E, Alam R, et al. The conceptual LeanPPD model. Proceedings of the 17th ISPE international conference on concurrent engineering ; 2010 Cracow ; 2010..
3. BernsteinJI (1998) Design methods in the aerospace industry: looking for evidence of set-based practices. Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Available at: http://lean.mit.edu/component/docman/cat-view/99-presentations/83-lai-annual-conferences/210-1998-plenary-conference?Itemid=1193
4. Charsky D. From edutainment to serious game: a change in the use of game characteristics. Games and Culture. 2010 ; 5: 177-198
5. Duke RD, Geurts JLA Policy Games for Strategic Management: Pathways into the Unknown. 2004 ) Policy Games for Strategic Management: Pathways into the Unknown. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press ; 2004 :
6. Egenfeldt NS. Overview of research on the educational use of video game. Digital kompetanse. 2006 ; 1: 184-213
7. Geurts JLA, Joldersma C. Methodology for participatory policy analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 2001 ; 128 (2). 300-310
8. Cousens A, Goffin K, Mitchell R, van der Hoven C, Szwejczewski M. Teaching New Product Development Using the 'CityCar' Simulation. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2009 ; 18 (3). 176-189
9. Hoheisel J, Weber F, Windhoff G. New approaches for training and education of engineers by using simulation games. IFIP TC5/WG5.7. Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on integrated production management systems and the European group of university teachers for industrial management ; 2000 Ghent ; 2000. 99.
10. HoppmannJ (2009) The lean innovation roadmap: a systematic approach to introduce lean in product development process and establishing a learning organisation. Master Thesis, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig. Available at: http://lean.mit.edu/downloads/cat-view/75-theses/492-2009-theses
11. Inoue M, Nahm Y, Tanaka K, et al. Collaborative engineering among designers with different preferences: application of the preference set-based design to the design problem of an automotive front-side frame. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2013 ; 21 (4). 252-267
12. Kennedy MN, Harmon K Ready, Set, Dominate: Implement Toyota's Set-Based Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You. Richmond, VA: Oaklea Press ; 2008 :
13. KhanMAl-AshaabAShehabE. (2011) Towards lean product and process development. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0951192X.2011.608723?tab=permissions#tabModule (accessed January 2013).
14. Liker JK, Sobek DK, Ward AC, et al. Involving suppliers in product development in the United States and Japan: evidence for set-based concurrent engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1996 ; 43 (2). 165-178
15. Mayer IS. The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: a review. Simulation & Gaming. 2009 ; 40 (6). 825-862
16. Morgan JM, Liker JK The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process, and Technology. New York: Productivity Press ; 2006 :
17. Nahm YE, Ishikawa H, Yang YS. A flexible and robust approach for preliminary engineering design based on designer's preference. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2007 ; 15 (1). 53-62
18. Oosterwal DP The Lean Machine: How Harley-Davidson Drove Top-Line Growth and Profitability with Revolutionary Lean Product Development. New York: American Management Association ; 2010 :
19. Pourabdollahian B, Taisch M, Kerga E. Serious games in manufacturing education: evaluation of learners' engagement. VS-GAMES 2012. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on games and virtual worlds for serious application ; 2012 Genoa ; 2012. 256.
20. Prensky M Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill ; 2001 :
21. Raudberget D. Practical applications of set-based concurrent engineering in industry. Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2010 ; 56 (11). 685-695
22. Riedel JCKH, Pawar KS. Academic and industrial user needs of a concurrent engineering computer simulation game. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2001 ; 9 (3). 223-237
23. Rossi M, Kerga E, Taisch M, et al. Learning methodologies to diffuse lean product development to industries. PLM 2012. Proceedings of international conference on product lifecycle management, IFIP ; 2012 Montreal, QC, Canada ; 2012. 287.
24. SobekDK (1997) Principles that shape product development systems: a Toyota and Chrysler comparison. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
25. Sobek DK, Ward AC, Liker JK. Toyota's principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Review. 1999 ; 40: 67-83
26. Takai S. A lifecycle-cost model for set-based concept testing. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2010 ; 18 (2). 121-127
27. Ward AC, Liker JK, Cristiano JJ, et al. The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review. 1995 ; 36: 43-61
28. Ward AC, Shook JK, Sobek DK Lean Product and Process Development. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute ; 2007 :
29. Wouters P, van der Spek ED, Oostendorp H. Measuring learning in serious games: a case study with structural assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2011 ; 59 (6). 741-763
30. Zhang X, Huang H, Wang Z, et al. A Pareto set coordination method for analytical target cascading. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 2013 ; 21 (4). 286-295
31. Zyda MJ. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. IEEE Computer Society. 2005 ; 38 (9). 25-32