Unsuccessful attempts to replicate effects of self control operations and glucose on ego-depletion pose an interesting research question that demands explanation

Appetite

Volumn 84, Issue , 2015, Pages 328-329

  Chatzisarantis, Nikos L D ^a   Hagger, Martin S ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Glucose; Motivation; Self control tasks

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; SUGAR INTAKE;

COGNITION; EFFECT SIZE; EGO; MOTIVATION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NOTE; SELF CONTROL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TASK PERFORMANCE; CONTROL; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; IMPULSIVENESS; METHODOLOGY; PHARMACOLOGY; SOCIAL CONTROL; SUGAR INTAKE;

DIETARY SUCROSE; EGO; GLUCOSE; HUMANS; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MOTIVATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL;

EID: 84912018758     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.024     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Baumeister R.F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., Tice D.M. Ego depletion. Is the active self a limited resource?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1252-1265.
2. Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D. Self-regulation, ego-depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2007, 1:115-128.
3. Chatzisarantis N.L.D., Hagger S.M. Illusionary delusions: Willingness to exercise self-control can mask effects of glucose on self-control performance in experimental paradigms that use identical self-control tasks. Appetite 2014.
4. Duval S., Tweedie R.L. Trim and fill. A simple funnel plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56:455-463.
5. Egger M., Sterne J.A.C. Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. Publication bias and meta-analysis. Prevention, assessments and adjustments 2005, 99-109. Wiley, Chichester, UK. H. Rothstein, A. Sutton, M. Borenstein (Eds.).
6. Field A.P. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods 2001, 6:161-180.
7. Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference. A critical review. Time and decision 2003, 13-86. Russell Sage Foundation Press, New York. G. Loewenstein, D. Read, R. Baumeister (Eds.).
8. Hagger M.S., Chatzisarantis N.L.D. The sweet taste of success. The presence of glucose in the oral cavity moderates the depletion of self-control resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2013, 39:27-41. 10.1177/0146167212459912.
9. Hagger M.S., Chatzisarantis N.L.D. It is premature to regard the ego-depletion effect as 'too incredible'. Frontiers in Psychology 2014, 5:298. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00298.
10. Hagger M.S., Wood C., Stiff C., Chatzisarantis N.L.D. Ego-depletion and the strength model of self-control. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:496-525.
11. Hunter J., Schmidt F. Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings 2004, Sage, London.
12. Ioannidis J.P., Trikalinos T.A. An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials 2007, 4:245-253. 10.1177/1740774507079441.
13. Lange F. If ego depletion cannot be studied using identical tasks, it is not ego depletion. A commentary on Chatzisarantis and Hagger. Appetite 2014.
14. Lange F., Eggert F. Sweet delusion. Glucose drinks fail to counteract ego depletion. Appetite 2014, 75:54-63. 10.1016/j.appet.2013.12.020.
15. Ryan R.M., Koestner R., Deci E.L. Varied forms of persistence. When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion 1991, 15:185-205.
16. Schimmack U. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods 2012, 17:551-566. 10.1037/a0029487.
17. Solman D., Ainslie G., Frederick S., Li X., Lynch J., Moreau P., et al. The psychology of intertemporal discounting. Why are distant events are valued differently from proximal ones?. Marketing Letter 2005, 5:347-360.