Oncologic outcomes between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: a propensity score matched analysis

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1441-1446

  Ahdoot, Michael ^a   Almario, Leanne ^a   Araya, Hiwot ^a   Busch, Jonas ^b   Conti, Simon ^a   Gonzalgo, Mark L ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bladder cancer; Cystectomy; Oncologic; Outcomes; Propensity score; Robotic

Indexed keywords

AGED; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROPENSITY SCORE; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

AGED; CARCINOMA; COHORT STUDIES; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROPENSITY SCORE; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84912017555     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1242-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Murta-Nascimento C, Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Zeegers MP et al (2007) Epidemiology of urinary bladder cancer: from tumor development to patient’s death. World J Urol 25(3):285–295. doi:10.1007/s00345-007-0168-5
2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90. doi:10.3322/caac.20107
3. Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M et al (2009) The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol 55(4):815–825. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.002
4. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R et al (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19(3):666–675. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11157016
5. Novara G, De Marco V, Aragona M et al (2009) Complications and mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell cancer. J Urol 182(3):914–921. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.032
6. De Nunzio C, Cindolo L, Leonardo C et al (2013) Analysis of radical cystectomy and urinary diversion complications with the Clavien classification system in an Italian real life cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(7):792–798. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.008
7. Froehner M, Brausi MA, Herr HW, Muto G, Studer UE (2009) Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol 56(3):443–454. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.008
8. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC et al (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55(1):164–174. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031
9. Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS (2008) Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. BJU Int 101(1):89–93. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07212.x
10. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee M-M et al (2010) A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol 57(2):274–281. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.001
11. Li K, Lin T, Fan X et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy. Cancer Treat Rev. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.11.007
12. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 57(2):196–201. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024
13. Galich A, Sterrett S, Nazemi T, Pohlman G, Smith L, Balaji KC (2006) Comparative analysis of early perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy by either the robotic or open method. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg Soc Laparoendosc Surg 10(2):145–150. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3016134&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
14. Novara G, Svatek RS, Karakiewicz PI et al (2010) Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients. J Urol 183(6):2165–2170. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.021
15. Madersbacher S (2003) Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer today—a homogeneous series without neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 21(4):690–696. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.05.101
16. Bochner BH, Kattan MW, Vora KC (2006) Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(24):3967–3972. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3884
17. Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF, Palapattu GS et al (2006) Nomogram for predicting disease recurrence after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 176(4 Pt 1):1354–1361. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.025 (discussion 1361–2)
18. Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Palapattu GS et al (2006) Nomograms provide improved accuracy for predicting survival after radical cystectomy. Clin Cancer Res 12(22):6663–6676. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0372
19. Kassouf W, Agarwal PK, Herr HW et al (2013) Lymph node density is superior to TNM nodal status in predicting disease-specific survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis of pooled data from MDACC and MSKCC. J Clin Oncol 26(1):121–126. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9247
20. Parekh DJ, Messer J, Fitzgerald J, Ercole B, Svatek R (2013) Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol 189(2):474–479. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.077
21. McCaffrey DF, Griffin BA, Almirall D, Slaughter ME, Ramchand R, Burgette LF (2013) A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Stat Med (January 2012). doi:10.1002/sim.5753
22. Benson MC (2010) Editorial comment. J Urol 184(1):91. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.158
23. Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE et al (2010) Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 184(1):87–91. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.037
24. Rink M, Shariat SF, Xylinas E et al (2012) Does increasing the nodal yield improve outcomes in patients without nodal metastasis at radical cystectomy? World J Urol 30:807–814. doi:10.1007/s00345-012-0910-5
25. Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE et al (2011) Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int 107(4):642–646. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09473.x
26. Herr H, Lee C, Chang S, Lerner S (2004) Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: a collaborative group report. J Urol 171(5):1823–1828. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000120289.78049.0e (discussion 1827–8)
27. Azzouni F (2012) Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 9(10):573–582. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2012.144
28. Bochner B, Cho D, Herr H, Donat M, Kattan M, Dalbagni G (2004) Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping. J Urol 172(4):1286–1290. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000137817.56888.d1
29. Stein JP, Penson DF, Cai J et al (2007) Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer. J Urol 177(3):876–881 (discussion 881–2)
30. US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. [online]. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01157676?term=NCT01157676&rank=1