Pre-sentence reports and punishment: A quasi-experiment assessing the effects of risk-based pre-sentence reports on sentencing

European Journal of Criminology

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 723-744

  van Wingerden, Sigrid ^a   van Wilsem, Johan ^a   Moerings, Martin ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Actuarial justice; penal welfarism; pre sentence report; propensity score matching; risk based sentencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911982777     PISSN: 14773708     EISSN: 17412609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477370814525937     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andrews DA,Bonta JLSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems; 1995:
2. Baron JThinking and Deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008:
3. De Keijser JWPunishment and Purpose: From Moral Theory to Punishment in Action. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis; 2001:
4. Deane H.The influence of pre-sentence reports on sentencing in a district court in New Zealand.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 2000;33 (1): 91-106
5. Downes D,Van Swaaningen RCrime and Justice in the Netherlands. Tonry MBijleveld C, ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007:31-71.
6. Downing K,Lynch R.Pre-sentence reports: Does quality matter?.Social Policy & Administration. 1997;31 (2): 173-190
7. Duff JCJudicial Business of the United States Courts. 2009 Annual Report of the Director. Washington, DC: Statistics Division Office of Judges Administrative Office; 2009:
8. Feeley MM,Simon J.The new penology – Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications.Criminology. 1992;30 (4): 449-474
9. Feeley MM,Simon JThe Futures of Criminology. Nelken D, ed. London: Sage; 1994:173-201.
10. Field S,Nelken D.Reading and writing youth justice in Italy and (England and) Wales.Punishment & Society. 2010;12 (3): 287-308
11. Garland DThe Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:
12. Gelsthorpe L,Raynor P.Quality and effectiveness in probation officers’ reports to sentencers.British Journal of Criminology. 1995;35 (2): 188-200
13. Gibbs A.The assessment, case management and evaluation system.Probation Journal. 1999;46 (3): 182-186
14. Guthrie C,Rachlinski JJ,Wistrich AJ.Inside the judicial mind.Cornell Law Review. 2001;86 (4): 777-830
15. Halliday S,Burns N,Hutton N,McNeill F,Tata C.Street-level bureaucracy, interprofessional relations, and coping mechanisms: A study of criminal justice social workers in the sentencing process.Law & Policy. 2009;31 (4): 405-428
16. Handleiding RISc. Gebruikersversie 1.0. Ontwikkeld in samenwerking tussen Adviesbureau Van Montfoort en Reclassering Nederland. 2004;:
17. Hannah-Moffat K.Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject – Hybridizations of risk/need in penality.Punishment & Society – International Journal of Penology. 2005;7 (1): 29-51
18. Hannah-Moffat K.Actuarial sentencing: An ‘unsettled’ proposition.Justice Quarterly. 2013;30 (2): 270-296
19. Howard P,Clark D,Garnham N.An Evaluation and Validation of the Offender Assessment System (OASys). 2003;:
20. Isaacs DM.Baseline framing in sentencing.Yale Law Journal. 2011;121 (426): 426-458
21. Johnson BD,Kurlychek MC.Transferred juveniles in the era of sentencing guidelines: Examining judicial departures for juvenile offenders in adult criminal court.Criminology. 2012;50 (2): 525-564
22. Jones AS,D’Agostino RB,Gondolf EW,Heckert A.Assessing the effect of batterer program completion on reassault using propensity scores.Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2004;19 (9): 1002-1020
23. Kurlychek MC,Johnson BD.Juvenility and punishment: Sentencing juveniles in adult criminal court.Criminology. 2010;48 (3): 725-758
24. LOVS [Landelijk Overleg Vakinhoud Strafrecht] (2013) Oriëntatiepunten voor straftoemeting en LOVS-afspraken. URL (accessed 20 February 2014): http://www.rechtspraak.nl/Procedures/Landelijke-regelingen/Sector-strafrecht/Documents/Orientatiepunten-en-afspraken-LOVS.pdf.
25. Martinson R.What works – Questions and answers about prison reform.Public Interest. 1974;35:22-54
26. Mathiesen T.Selective incapacitation revisited.Law and Human Behavior. 1998;22 (4): 455-469
27. Moerings MStraffen met het oog op veiligheid, een onderneming vol risico’s. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden; 2003:
28. Persson A,Svensson K.Shades of professionalism: Risk assessment in pre-sentence reports in Sweden.European Journal of Criminology. 2012;9 (2): 176-190
29. Midden in de samenleving. Jaarverslag 2011. 2012;:
30. Rosenbaum PR,Rubin DB.Constructing a control-group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score.American Statistician. 1985;39 (1): 33-38
31. Scott DPenology. London: Sage; 2008:
32. Tata C,Burns N,Halliday S,Hutton N,McNeill F.Assisting and advising the sentencing decision process: The pursuit of ‘quality’ in pre-sentence reports.British Journal of Criminology. 2008;48 (6): 835-855
33. Ten Velden F,De Dreu CSociaalpsychologische determinanten van strafrechtelijke besluitvorming. Research memoranda. The Hague: Raad voor de rechtspraak; 2012:
34. Van der Knaap LM,Leenarts LEW,Nijssen LTJPsychometrische kwaliteiten van de Recidive Inschattingsschalen (RISc). Interbeoordelaarsbetrouwbaarheid, interne consistentie en congruente validiteit. The Hague: WODC; 2007:
35. Van der Knaap LM,Leenarts LEW,Born MP,Oosterveld P.Reevaluating interrater reliability in offender risk assessment.Crime & Delinquency. 2012;58 (1): 147-163
36. Van der Woude MAH.De hedendaagse beheersingscultuur als zondeboksamenleving.PROCES. 2007;86 (4): 159-167
37. Van Swaaningen R.Justitie als verzekeringsmaatschappij.Justitiële verkenningen. 1996;22 (5): 82-97
38. Van Wingerden SGC,Moerings M,Van Wilsem JARisicotaxatie en straftoemeting. Research memoranda. The Hague: Raad voor de rechtspraak; 2011:
39. Wandall RH.Resisting risk assessment? Pre-sentence reports and individualized sentencing in Denmark.Punishment & Society – International Journal of Penology. 2010;12 (3): 329-347
40. Wermink HT,Blokland A,Nieuwbeerta P,Nagin D,Tollenaar N.Comparing the effects of community service and short-term imprisonment on recidivism: A matched samples approach.Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2010;6 (3): 325-349