Impact of Technology Foresight on the Policy-making Process in Iran

Science, Technology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 275-304

  Hassanzadeh, Alireza ^a   Namdarian, Leila ^a   Elahi, Sha’ban ^a   Majidpour, Mehdi ^a  

^a TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEAST SQUARES METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

IRAN;

EID: 84911973308     PISSN: 09717218     EISSN: 09730796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0971721814548112     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albers, S. Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009:409-425.
2. Amanatidou, E.EU-SPRI conference.; 2011; 2011.
3. Amanatidou, E.,Guy, K.Interpreting foresight process impacts: Steps towards the development of a framework conceptualizing the dynamics of foresight systems.Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2008;75 (4): 539-555
4. Beecham, S.,Hall, T.,Britton, C.,Cottee, M.,Rainer, A.Using an expert panel to validate a requirements process improvement model.Journal of Systems and Software. 2005;76 (3): 251-275
5. Bollen, K. A.Structural equation models. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1998:
6. Calof, J.,Smith, J. E. Foresight impacts from around the world: A special issue.Foresight. 2012;14 (1): 5-14
7. Cuhls, K.,Georghiou, L.Evaluating a participative foresight process: Futur the German research dialogue,.Research Evaluation. 2004;13:143-153
8. Da Costa, O.,Warnke, P.,Cagnin, C.,Scapolo, F.The impact of foresight on policy-making: Insights from the FORLEARN mutual learning process.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2008;20 (3): 369-387
9. De SmedtP. (2006). Interactions between foresight and decision-making. Second International Seville Seminar on Future-oriented Technology Analysis: Impact of FTA Approaches on Policy and Decision-making, SEVILLE, September.
10. Dyba, T.An instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement.Empirical Software Engineering. 2000;5 (4): 357-390
11. FORLEARN (2006, November). For-Learn mutual learning consolidation workshop improving the use of foresight in policy-making, 2, 6, 2013 Retrieved from http://forlearn.jrc.es/guide/8_mutual/seminar4.htm
12. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18 (2): 39-50
13. Georghiou, L.Issues in the evaluation of innovation and technology policy. University of Manchester: Science and Technology (PREST); 2006:
14. GeorghiouL.AchesonH.CassingenaHarper, J.ClarG.KlusacekK. (2004). Evaluation of the Hungarian Technology Foresight Program (TEP). Report of an international panel. Retrieved 10June2013 from www.nih.gov.hu/pdf-nyomtatas?cikkid=3826
15. Georghiou, L.,Keenan, M.Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact.Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2005;73:761-777
16. Georghiou, L.,Keenan, M.The handbook of technology foresight: Concepts and practices. Georghiou, L.Harper, J. CassingenaKeenan, M.Miles, I.Popper, R., ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2008:376.
17. Georgiou, L.,Cassingena, Harper, J.,Keenan, M.,Miles, I.,Popper, R.Technology foresight: Concepts and practices, The Handbook. Edward Elgar; 2008:
18. Goodman, L. A.Snowball sampling.Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1961;32:148-170
19. Grim, T.Foresight Maturity Model (FMM): Achieving best practices in the foresight field.Journal of Futures Studies. 2009;13 (4): 69-80
20. Hakim, C.Contemporary social research. Bulmer, M., ed. London: Routledge; 1987:
21. HansmannK. W.RingleC. M. (2005). Smart PLS website, powered by php BB 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
22. Havas, A.,Schartinger, D.,Weber, M.The impact of foresight on innovation policy-making: Recent experiences and future perspectives.Research Evaluation. 2010;19 (2): 91-104
23. Hinton, P. R.,Brownlow, C.,Mc Murray, I.,Cozens, B.SPSS explained. NY: Routledge; 2004:
24. Hulland, J.Use of partial least squares (PLSs) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies.Strategy Management Journal. 1999;20 (2): 195-204
25. Jarvis, C. B.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Podsakoff, P. M.A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research.Journal of Consumer Research. 2003;30 (2): 199-218
26. Johnston, R.The impact of foresight: Towards an assessment schema.; 2010; 2010.
27. Kuhlmann, S.Future governance of innovation policy in Europe—Three scenarios,.Research Policy. 2001;30 (6): 953-976
28. Kurant, M.,Markopoulou, A.,Thiran, P.Towards Unbiased BFS Sampling.IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 2011;29 (9): 1799-1809
29. Ladikas, M.,Decker, M.Assessing the impact of future-oriented technology assessment.; 2004; 2004.
30. Li, S. S.,Kang, M. H.,Lee, L. C.Developing the evaluation framework of technology foresight program: Lesson learned from European countries.; 2009; 2009. 1.
31. Loveridge, D.,Cuhls, K.,Keenan, M.,Nedeva, M.The practice of national foresight programs. A new analytical framework.Policy Research in Engineering, Science & Technology. 2001;23 (1): 1-17
32. Miles, I.Dynamic foresight evaluation.Foresight. 2012;14 (1): 69-81
33. Paya, A.,Shoraka, H. R.Futures studies in Iran: Learning through trial and error.Futures. 2010;42 (4): 484-495
34. Poorman, P. B.Perceptions of thriving by women who have experienced abuse or status-related oppression.Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2002;26 (1): 51-62
35. Popper, R.,Keenan, M.,Medina, J.Evaluating foresight—The Colombian case.Foresight. 2010;119:2-4
36. Ranganathan, C.,Sethi, V.Rationality in strategic information technology decisions: The impact of shared domain knowledge and IT unit structure.Decision Science. 2002;33 (1): 59-86
37. Rowe, G.,Frewer, L.Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda.Science, Technology and Human Values. 2004;29 (4): 512-556
38. Sanz-Menéndez, L.,Cabello, C.Understanding technology foresight: The relevance of its S&T policy context.International Journal of Technology Management. 2001;21 (2): 661-679
39. Schartinger, D.,Wilhelmer, D.,Holste, D.,Kubeczko, K.Assessing immediate learning impacts of large foresight,.Foresight. 2012;14 (1): 41-55
40. Smits, E. R.,Kuhlmann, S.,Shapira, P.The theory and practice of innovation policy, International handbook. UK: Edward Elgar; 2010:
41. Tenenhaus, M.,Vinzi, V. E.,Chatelin, Y. M.,Lauro, C.PLS path modeling.Computational Statistics and Data Analysis. 2005;48 (1): 159-205
42. UNIDO technology foresight manual: Organization and methods. Vienna: ; 2005:
43. Vinzi, V. E.,Chin, Wynne W.,Henseler, J.,Wang, H.Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields. New York: Springer; 2008:
44. Warnke, P.,Heimeriks, G.Technology foresight as innovation policy instrument—learning from science and technology.; 2006; 2006.
45. Wixom, B. H.,Watson, H. J.An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success.MIS Quarterly. 2001;25 (1): 17-41