Putting Foucault to Work: Understanding Power in a Rural School

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 652-669

  Freie, Carrie ^a   Eppley, Karen ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911965452     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0161956X.2014.958908     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
2. Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2003). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools (NBER Working Paper 9953). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). Preface. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. ix–x). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and criticism: Post-structural investigations in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
5. Christianakis, M., & Mora, R. (2011). Charting a new course for public education through charter schools: Where is Obama taking us? In B. Porfilio & P. Carr (Eds.), The phenomenon of Obama and the agenda for education: Can hope audaciously trump neoliberalism? Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
6. Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Danaher, G., Schirato, T., & Webb, J. (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
8. Eppley, K. (in press). “Hey, I saw your grandparents at Walmart”: Teacher preparation for rural schools and communities. The Teacher Educator.
9. Finn, P. (2009). Literacy with an attitude: Educating working-class children in their own self interest. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
10. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). London, UK: Allen Lane, Penguin.
11. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
12. Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality: Volume 1. London, UK: Penguin.
13. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 775–795.
14. Foucault, M. (1991a). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London, UK: Penguin.
15. Foucault, M. (1991b). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Foucault, M. (2000). On the genealogy of ethics. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics (253–280). London, UK: Penguin.
17. Foucault, M. (2002a). Governmentality. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Power (201–222). London, UK: Penguin.
18. Foucault, M. (2002b). The subject and power. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Power (326–348). London, UK: Penguin.
19. Gillies, D. (2013). Educational leadership and Michel Foucault. New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Giroux, H.A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
21. Giroux, H.A. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22. Gore, J. (1998). Disciplining bodies: On the continuity of power relations in pedagogy. In T. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 231–251). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23. Green, B. (1998). Born-again teaching? Governmentality, “grammar,” and public schooling. In T. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 173–204). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
24. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., & Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
25. Harvey, D. (2006). Neo-liberalism as creative destruction. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 88(2), 145–158.
26. Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides
27. Hopmann, S. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40, 417–456.
28. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London, UK: Sage.
29. Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across borders: Policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377.
30. Lyson, T. (2002). What does a school mean to a community? Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17(3), 131–137.
31. McLaren, P. (1991). Schooling and the postmodern body: Critical pedagogy and the politics of enfleshment. In Henry Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics: Redrawing educational boundaries. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
32. McLaren, P., & Hammer, R. (1989). Critical pedagogy and the postmodern challenge: Toward a critical postmodernist pedagogy of liberation. Educational Foundations, 3(3), 29–62.
33. Metz, M.H. (1990). Real school: A universal drama amid disparate experiences. In D.E. Mitchell & M.E. Goertz (Eds.), Education politics for the new century: The twentieth anniversary yearbook of the politics of education association. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
34. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Number of public school districts and public and private elementary and secondary schools: Selected years, 1869-70 through 2010–11. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_098.asp
35. Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership: Disciplining the principal. New York, NY: Routledge.
36. Niesche, R. (2013). Foucault, counter-conduct and school leadership as a form of political subjectivity. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 144–158.
37. Popkewitz, T., & Brennan, M. (1997). Restructuring of social and political theory in education: Foucault and a social epistemology of school practices. Educational Theory, 47(3), 287–313.
38. Popkewitz, T., & Brennan, M. (1998a). Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39. Popkewitz, T., & Brennan, M. (1998b). Restructuring of social and political theory in education: Foucault and a social epistemology of school practices. In T. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 3–35). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40. Robertson, S. (2012). World-class higher education (for whom)? Prospects, 42(3), 237–245.
41. Thomson, P. (2009). School leadership: Heads on the block? New York, NY: Routledge.
42. Weis, L. (1990). Working-class without work: High school students in a deindustrializing economy. New York, NY: Routledge.
43. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.