Stochastic interpretation of thermal response test with TRT-SInterp

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 75, Issue , 2015, Pages 73-87

  Pasquier, Philippe ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Finite line source model; Ground or borehole heat exchanger; Stochastic inversion; Thermal resistance and capacity model; Thermal response test

Indexed keywords

FLOW RATE; GROUTING; HEAT EXCHANGERS; HEAT RESISTANCE; MORTAR; SOFTWARE TESTING; SPECIFIC HEAT; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; TESTING; WAKES;

BOREHOLE HEAT EXCHANGERS; CAPACITY MODELING; LINE-SOURCE MODELING; STOCHASTIC INVERSION; THERMAL RESPONSE TEST;

THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY;

BOREHOLE; HEAT CAPACITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; STOCHASTICITY; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY;

EID: 84911947073     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Al-Khoury R., Kölbel T., Schramedei R. Efficient finite element modeling of shallow geothermal systems. Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36(10):1301-1315.
2. Bauer D., Heidemann W., Diersch H.-J. Transient 3D analysis of borehole heat exchanger modeling. Geothermics 2011, 40(4):250-260.
3. Beier R.A., Smith M.D. Removing variable heat rate effects from borehole tests. ASHRAE Trans. 2003, 109:463-474.
4. Bennet, J., Claesson, J., Hellström, G., 1987. Multipole Method to Compute the Conductive Heat Flows to and Between Pipes in a Composite Cylinder. Tech. Rep., University of Lund, Department of Building Technology and Mathematical Physics., Lund, Sweden.
5. Claesson J., Javed S. An analytical method to calculate borehole fluid temperatures for time-scales from minutes to decades. ASHRAE Trans. 2011, 117:279-288.
6. Focaccia S., Tinti F., Bruno R. A software tool for geostatistical analysis of thermal response test data. GA-TRT. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 59:163-170.
7. Forsythe G., Malcolm M., Moler C. Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations 1976, Prentice-Hall.
8. Gehlin, S., 2002. Thermal Response Test: Method Development and Evaluation. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, p. 191.
9. Hellström, G., 1991. Ground Heat Storage. Thermal Analysis of Duct Storage Systems. Part 1 Theory (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Lund, Sweden.
10. Hestenes M.R., Stiefel E. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1952, 49:409-436.
11. The MathWorks Inc., 2013. Matlab, Version 8.2.0 (R2013b). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts.
12. Ingersoll L., Zobel O., Ingersoll A. Heat Conduction with Engineering, Geological and Other Applications 1954, McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Lamarche L., Beauchamp B. New solutions for the short-time analysis of geothermal vertical boreholes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2007, 50(7-8):1408-1419.
14. Li M., Lai A.C. Parameter estimation of in-situ thermal response tests for borehole ground heat exchangers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 55(9-10):2615-2624.
15. Marcotte D., Pasquier P. Fast fluid and ground temperature computation for geothermal ground-loop heat exchanger systems. Geothermics 2008, 37(6):651-665.
16. Marcotte D., Pasquier P. On the estimation of thermal resistance in borehole thermal conductivity test. Renew. Energy 2008, 33(11):2407-2415.
17. Marcotte D., Pasquier P., Sheriff F., Bernier M. The importance of axial effects for borehole design of geothermal heat-pump systems. Renew. Energy 2010, 35(4):763-770.
18. Pasquier, P., Groleau, P., 2009. Comparaison des performances thermiques de puits géothermiques amgénagés avec des conduits versapipe HD et geoperform. Technical Report, Golder Associates, Canada.
19. Pasquier P., Marcotte D. Short-term simulation of ground heat exchanger with an improved TRCM. Renew. Energy 2012, 46:92-99.
20. Pasquier P., Marcotte D. Efficient computation of heat flux signals to ensure the reproduction of prescribed temperatures at several interacting heat sources. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 59(1-2):515-526.
21. Pasquier P., Marcotte D. Joint use of quasi-3d response model and spectral method to simulate borehole heat exchanger. Geothermics 2014, 51:281-299.
22. Pasquier, P., Marcotte, D., Bernier, M., Kummert, M., August 2013. Simulation of ground-coupled heat pump systems using a spectral approach. In: Proceedings of BS2013. Chambgéry, France, pp. 2691-2698.
23. Signorelli S., Bassetti S., Pahud D., Kohl T. Numerical evaluation of thermal response tests. Geothermics 2007, 36(April (2)):141-166.
24. Wagner R., Clauser C. Evaluating thermal response tests using parameter estimation for thermal conductivity and thermal capacity. J. Geophys. Eng. 2005, 2(4):349.
25. Wagner V., Bayer P., Kübert M., Blum P. Numerical sensitivity study of thermal response tests. Renew. Energy 2012, 41(May):245-253.
26. Witte H.J., van Gelder A., Spitler J.D. In-situ measurement of ground thermal conductivity. the Dutch perspective. ASHRAE Trans. 2002, 108(1).
27. Witte H.J. Error analysis of thermal response tests. Appl. Energy 2013, 109:302-311.
28. Zarrella A., Capozza A., De Carli M. Analysis of short helical and double U-tube borehole heat exchangers. a simulation-based comparison. Appl. Energy 2013, 112:358-370.
29. Zarrella A., Scarpa M., DeCarli M. Short time step analysis of vertical ground-coupled heat exchangers: The approach of CaRM. Renew. Energy 2011, 36(9):2357-2367.
30. Zeng H.Y., Diao N.R., Fang Z.H. A finite line-source model for boreholes in geothermal heat exchangers. Heat Transf.-Asian Res. 2002, 31(7):558-567.