Erratum to: ‘Mirroring’ the Ethics of Biobanking: What Should We Learn from the Analysis of Consent Documents? (Science and Engineering Ethics, DOI 10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0);‚Mirroring‘ the Ethics of Biobanking: What Analysis of Consent Documents Can Tell Us?

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1079-1093

  Jurate, Serepkaite ^a   Zivile, Valuckiene ^b   Eugenijus, Gefenas ^a  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Biobanking; Consent documents; Ethics; Europe

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; DONOR; ETHICS; EUROPE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORALITY; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSENT FORMS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; EUROPE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MORALS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; POLICY; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84911915858     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 14715546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-013-9503-y     Document Type: Erratum

References (19)

1. Austrian Bioethics Commission at the Federal Chancellery. (2007). Biobanks for medical research. May 9, 2007. https://www.bka.gv.at/DocView.axd?CobId=25510. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
2. Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics. (2009). Opinion no. 45 of 19 January 2009 on human biological material banks intended for research. http://www.gesundheit.belgien.be/eportal/Healthcare/Consultativebodies/Commitees/Bioethics/Opinions/8548405?ie2Term=WHO&ie2section=9126&fodnlang=en. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
3. Bredenoord, A. L., Kroes, H. Y., Cuppen, E., Parker, M., & van Delden, J. J. M. (2011). Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: The debate reconsidered. Trends in Genetics,27(2), 41–47.
4. Brothers, K. B. (2011). Biobanking in pediatrics: The human nonsubjects approach. Personalised Medicine,8(1), 71–79.
5. Chadwick, R., & Bere, K. (2001). Solidarity and equity: New ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nature Reviews Genetics,2(4), 318–321.
6. EnCoRe—Ensuring Consent and Revocation. (2012). http://www.encore-project.info/. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
7. European Commission. (2010). Europeans and biotechnology in 2010.Winds of change?http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_winds_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2012.
8. European Commission. (2012). Biobanks for Europe. A challenge for governance. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/biobanks-for-europe_en.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
9. Federation of Medical Scientific Societies. (2003). Code for proper secondary use of human tissue in the Netherlands. http://www.federa.org/sites/default/files/bijlagen/coreon/codepropersecondaryuseofhumantissue1_0.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2013.
10. Gefenas, E., Dranseika, V., Cekanauskaite, A., Serepkaite, J. (2011). Research on human biological materials: What consent is needed and when. In: C. Lenk, J. Sandor, & B. Gordijn (Eds.), Biobanks and tissue research (pp. 95–110). New York: Springer, Series: The international library of ethics, law and technology.
11. Helgesson, G., Ludvigsson, J., & Gustafsson Stolt, U. (2005). How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study. Journal of Medical Ethics,31(11), 670–673.
12. Hoeyer, K. (2010). Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: time to acknowledge diversity? Public Health Genomics.,13(6), 345–352.
13. Irish Council for Bioethics. (2005). Human biological material: Recommendations for collection, use and storage in research. http://www.bioethics.ie/uploads/docs/BiologicalMaterial.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
14. Knoppers, B. M., & Chadwick, R. (2005). Human genetic research: Emerging trends in ethics. Nature Reviews Genetics,6(1), 75–79.
15. Knoppers, B. M., Joly, Y., Simard, J., & Durocher, F. (2006). The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. European Journal of Human Genetics,14(11), 1170–1178.
16. Miller, F. A., Christensen, R., Giacomini, M., & Robert, J. S. (2008). Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. Journal of Medical Ethics,34(3), 210–213.
17. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2011). In B. Prainsack & A. Buyx (Eds.), Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics. London. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/NCOB_Solidarity_report_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
18. Park, A. (2009). 10 Ideas changing the world right now. Time. http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1884779_1884782_1884766,00.html. Accessed 12 Nov 2012.
19. Riegman, P. H., Morente, M. M., Betsou, F., de Blasio, P., Geary, P., & International Working Group on Biobanking for Biomedical Research. (2008). Biobanking for better healthcare. Molecular Oncology, 2(3), 213.