A systematic review of electronic portal usage among patients with diabetes

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 784-793

  Amante, Daniel J ^a   Hogan, Timothy P ^a,b   Pagoto, Sherry L ^a   English, Thomas M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI)   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CINAHL; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; ELECTRONICS; HUMAN; MEDLINE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYMPOSIUM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNITED STATES; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT RIGHT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CARE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SELF CARE;

EID: 84911910140     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: 15578593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0078     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. American Diabetes Association: Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1033-1046.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Number (in Millions) of Civilian, Noninstitutionalized Persons with Diagnosed Diabetes, United States, 1980-2011. www.cdc .gov/diabetes/statistics/prev/national/figpersons.htm (accessed January 3, 2014).
3. Berwick DM: A user's manual for the IOM's 'Quality Chasm' report. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:80-90.
4. Singer SJ, Burgers J, Friedberg M, et al.: Defining and measuring integrated patient care: promoting the next frontier in health care delivery. Med Care Res Rev 2011; 68:112-127.
5. Naylor MD: Transitional care of older adults. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2002;20:127-147.
6. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K: Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 2002;288:1909-1914.
7. Bayliss EA, Bosworth HB, Noel PH, et al.: Supporting selfmanagement for patients with complex medical needs: recommendations of a working group. Chronic Illn 2007;3: 167-175.
8. Bates DW, Wells S: Personal health records and health care utilization. JAMA 2012;308:2034-2036.
9. Osborn CY, Mayberry LS, Mulvaney SA, et al.: Patient web portals to improve diabetes outcomes: a systematic review. Curr Diabetes Rep 2010;10:422-435.
10. Shaw RJ, Ferranti J: Patient-provider internet portals-patient outcomes and use. Comput Inform Nurs 2011;29: 714-718; quiz 719-720.
11. Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, et al.: A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:729-736.
12. Bond GE, Burr R, Wolf FM, et al.: The effects of a webbased intervention on the physical outcomes associated with diabetes among adults age 60 and older: a randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2007;9:52-59.
13. McMahon GT, Gomes HE, Hickson Hohne S, et al.: Webbased care management in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1624-1629.
14. Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Hoath J, et al.: Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2009;32:234-239.
15. McCarrier KP, Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, et al.: Web-based collaborative care for type 1 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009;11:211-217.
16. Zhou YY, Garrido T, Chin HL, et al.: Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manag Care 2007;13:418-424.
17. Shimada SL, Hogan TP, Rao SR, et al.: Patient-provider secure messaging in VA: variations in adoption and association with urgent care utilization. Med Care 2013; 51(Suppl 1):S21-S28.
18. Kannry J, Beuria P, Wang E, et al.: Personal health records: meaningful use, but for whom? Mt Sinai J Med 2012;79: 593-602.
19. Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, et al.: Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18(Suppl 1):i8-i12.
20. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.
21. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al.: Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:121-126.
22. Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, et al.: Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:677-687.
23. Weppner WG, Ralston JD, Koepsell TD, et al.: Use of a shared medical record with secure messaging by older patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2314-2319.
24. Lyles CR, Harris LT, Jordan L, et al.: Patient race/ethnicity and shared medical record use among diabetes patients. Med Care 2012;50:434-440.
25. Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. 2011. http://mixedmethodsappraisal toolpublic.pbworks.com (accessed September 22, 2013).
26. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, et al.: The literacy divide: health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system-results from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Commun 2010;15(Suppl 2):183-196.
27. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, et al.: Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:318-321.
28. Hess R, Bryce CL, Paone S, et al.: Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes selfmanagement: implementation and initial assessment. Telemed J E Health 2007;13:509-517.
29. Zickmund SL, Hess R, Bryce CL, et al.: Interest in the use of computerized patient portals: role of the provider-patient relationship. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23(Suppl 1):20-26.
30. Mayberry LS, Kripalani S, Rothman RL, et al.: Bridging the digital divide in diabetes: family support and implications for health literacy. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13: 1005-1012.
31. Osborn CY, Mayberry LS, Wallston KA, et al.: Understanding patient portal use: implications for medication management. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e133.
32. Cho AH, Arar NH, Edelman DE, et al.: Do diabetic veterans use the Internet? Self-reported usage, skills, and interest in using My HealtheVet Web portal. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:595-602.
33. Wade-Vuturo AE, Mayberry LS, Osborn CY: Secure messaging and diabetes management: experiences and perspectives of patient portal users. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:519-525.
34. Tenforde M, Nowacki A, Jain A, et al.: The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:420-424.
35. Bredfeldt CE, Compton-Phillips AL, Snyder MH: Effects of between visit physician-patient communication on Diabetes Recognition Program scores. Int J Qual Health Care 2011;23:664-673.
36. Fonda SJ, McMahon GT, Gomes HE, et al.: Changes in diabetes distress related to participation in an internet-based diabetes care management program and glycemic control. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:117-124.
37. Harris LT, Haneuse SJ, Martin DP, et al.: Diabetes quality of care and outpatient utilization associated with electronic patient-provider messaging: a cross-sectional analysis. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1182-1187.
38. Lyles CR, Sarkar U, Ralston JD, et al.: Patient-provider communication and trust in relation to use of an online patient portal among diabetes patients: the Diabetes and Aging Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:1128-1131.
39. Jethwani K, Ling E, Mohammed M, et al.: Diabetes connect: an evaluation of patient adoption and engagement in a web-based remote glucose monitoring program. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012;6:1328-1336.
40. Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Nguyen M: Parent intention to use a patient portal as related to their children following a facilitated demonstration. Telemed J E Health 2013;19: 979-981.
41. Brown LL, Lustria ML, Rankins J: A review of webassisted interventions for diabetes management: maximizing the potential for improving health outcomes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2007;1:892-902.
42. Cotten SR, Gupta SS: Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1795-1806.
43. Hibbard JH, Greene J: What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32: 207-214.
44. Kinney AY, Richards C, Vernon SW, et al.: The effect of physician recommendation on enrollment in the Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial. Prev Med 1998;27:713-719.
45. North F, Hanna BK, Crane SJ, et al.: Patient portal doldrums: does an exam room promotional video during an office visit increase patient portal registrations and portal use? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18(Suppl 1):i24-i27.