Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the parietal cortex leads to increased false recognition

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 66, Issue , 2015, Pages 88-98

  Pergolizzi, Denise ^a   Chua, Elizabeth F ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

False recognition; Human memory; Parietal, confidence; TDCS; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BATTERY POWERED NERVE STIMULATOR; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONFIDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEESE ROEDIGER MCDERMOTT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPISODIC MEMORY; FALSE MEMORY; FALSE RECOGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY RETRIEVAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; RECOGNITION; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION; ADOLESCENT; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PARIETAL LOBE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84911868300     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Ally B.A., Simons J.S., McKeever J.D., Peers P.V., Budson A.E. Parietal contributions to recollection: electrophysiological evidence from aging and patients with parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1800-1812. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.026.
2. Antal A., Nitsche M.A., Kruse W., Kincses T.Z., Hoffman K.P., Paulus W. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2004, 16(4):521-527. 10.1162/089892904323057263.
3. Berryhill M.E., Jones K.T. tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 521(2):148-151. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.074.
4. Berryhill M.E., Olson I.R. Is the posterior parietal lobe involved in working memory retrieval? Evidence from patients with bilateral parietal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1775-1786. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.005.
5. Berryhill M.E., Wencil E., Coslett H.B., Olson I. A selective working memory impairment after transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the right parietal lobe. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 479(3):312-316. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.087.A.
6. Boggio P.S., Fregni F., Valasek C., Ellwood S., Chi R., Gallate J., Snyder A. Temporal lobe cortical electrical stimulation during the encoding and retrieval phase reduces false memories. PloS One 2009, 4(3):1-5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004959.
7. Busey T.A., Tunnicliff J., Loftus G.R., Loftus E.F. Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2000, 7(1):26-48.
8. Cabeza R., Rao S.M., Wagner A.D., Mayer A.R., Schacter D.L. Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98(8):4805-4810. 10.1073/pnas.081082698.
9. Cabeza R. Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: the dual attentional processes hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1813-1827. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.019.
10. Cabeza R., Ciaramelli E., Moscovitch M. Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2012, 16(6):338-352. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.008.Cognitive.
11. Cansino S., Maquet P., Dolan R.J., Rugg M.D. Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12(10):1048-1056. 10.1093/cercor/12.10.1048.
12. Chua E.F., Rand-Giovannetti E., Schacter D.L., Albert M.S., Sperling R.A. Dissociating confidence and accuracy: functional magnetic resonance imaging shows origins of the subjective memory experience. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2004, 16(7):1131-1142. 10.1162/0898929041920568.
13. Chua E.F., Schacter D.L., Rand-Giovannetti E., Sperling R.A. Understanding metamemory: neural correlates of the cognitive process and subjective level of confidence in recognition memory. NeuroImage 2006, 29(4):1150-1160. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.058.
14. Chua E.F., Schacter D.L., Sperling R.A. Neural correlates of metamemory: a comparison of feeling-of-knowing and retrospective confidence judgments. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2009, 21(9):1751-1765. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21123.Neural.
15. Ciaramelli E., Grady C.L., Moscovitch M. Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1828-1851. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.022.
16. Clemens B., Jung S., Mingoia G., Weyer D., Domahs F., Willmes K. Influence of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right angular gyrus on brain activity during Rest. PLoS One 2014, 9(4):1. 10.1371/journal.pone.0095984.
17. Coane J.H., McBride D.M. The role of test structure in creating false memories. Mem. Cognit. 2006, 34(5):1026-1036. 10.3758/BF03193249.
18. Datta A., Bansal V., Diaz J., Patel J., Reato D., Bikson M. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2009, 2(4):201-207. 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005.
19. Datta A., Truong D., Minhas P., Parra L.C., Bikson M. Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Front. Psychiatry 2012, 3:91. 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00091.
20. Davidson P.S.R., Anaki D., Ciaramelli E., Cohn M., Kim A.S.N., Murphy K.J., Troyer A.K., Moscovitch M., Levine B. Does lateral parietal cortex support episodic memory? Evidence from focal lesion patients. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1743-1755. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.011.
21. Deese J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 1959, 58:17-22.
22. Dobbins I.G., Rice H.J., Wagner A.D., Schacter D.L. Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(3):318-333.
23. Dobbins I.G., Jaeger A., Studer B., Simons J. Use of explicit memory cues following parietal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(13):2992-3003. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.037.Use.
24. Donaldson D.I., Wheeler M.E., Petersen S.E. Remember the source: Dissociating frontal and parietal contributions to episodic memory. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2010, 22:377-391. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21242.
25. Drowos D.B., Berryhill M., André J.M., Olson I.R. True memory, false memory, and subjective recollection deficits after focal parietal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology 2010, 24(4):465-475. 10.1037/a0018902.
26. Eldridge L.L., Knowlton B.J., Furmanski C.S., Bookheimer S.Y., Engel S.A. Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3(11):1149-1152. 10.1038/80671.
27. Gandiga P.C., Hummel F.C., Cohen L.G. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117(4):845-850.
28. Gardiner J.M., Java R.I. Recollective experience in word and non-word recognition. Mem. Cognit. 1990, 18(1):23-30.
29. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York.
30. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neuroscience 2007, 30:535-574. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038.
31. Grefkes C., Ward N.S. Cortical reorganization after stroke: how much and how functional?. Neuroscientist 2013, 10.1177/1073858413491147.
32. Gronlund S.D., Elam L.E. List-length effect: recognition accuracy and the variance of underlying distributions. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 1994, 20:1355-1369. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1355.
33. Guerin S.A., Miller M.B. Lateralization of the parietal old/new effect: an event-related fMRI study comparing recognition memory for words and faces. Neuroimage 2009, 44(1):232-242. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.035.
34. Hammer A., Mohammadi B., Schmicker M., Saliger S., Munte T.F. Errorless and errorful learning modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 2011, 12:72. 10.1186/1471-2202-12-72.
35. Haramati S., Soroker N., Dudai Y., Levy D.A. The posterior parietal cortex in recognition memory: a neuropsychological study. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1756-1766. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.015.
36. Hauser T.U., Rotzer S., Grabner R.H., Merillat S., Jancke L. Enhancing performance in numerical magnitude processing and mental arithmetic using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:244. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00244.
37. Hayes S.M., Buchler N., Stokes J., Kragel J., Cabeza R. Neural correlates of confidence during item recognition and source memory retrieval: evidence for both dual-process and strength memory theories. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2011, 23(12):3959-3971. 10.1162/jocn_a_00086.
38. Henson R.N.A., Rugg M.D., Shallice T., Dolan R.J. Confidence in recognition memory for words: dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2000, 12(6):913-923.
39. Henson R.N.A., Rugg M.D., Shallice T., Josephs O., Dolan R.J. Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19(10):3962-3972.
40. Henson R.N.A., Shallice T., Gorno-Tempini M.L., Dolan R.J. Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12(2):178-186.
41. Hower K.H., Wixted J., Berryhill M.E., Olson I.R. Impaired perception of mnemonic oldness, but not mnemonic newness, after parietal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia 2014, 56:409-417. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.014.
42. Hutchinson J.B., Uncapher M.R., Wagner A.D. Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory. Learn. Mem. 2009, 16(6):343-356. 10.1101/lm.919109.
43. Idaka T., Matsumoto A., Nogawa J., Yamamoto Y., Sadato N. Frontoparietal network involved in successful retrieval from episodic memory. Spatial and temporal analyses using fMRI and ERP. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16(9):1349-1360. 10.1093/cercor/bhl040.
44. Jacobson L., Goren N., Lavidor M., Levy D.A. Oppositional transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of parietal substrates of attention during encoding modulates episodic memory. Brain Res. 2012, 1439:66-72. 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.036.
45. Javadi A.H., Walsh V. Stimulation transcranial direct current (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memo. Brain Stimul. 2012, 5(3):231-241. 10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.007.
46. Jaeger A., Konkel A., Dobbins I.G. Unexpected novelty and familiarity orienting responses in lateral parietal cortex during recognition judgment. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(6):1061-1076. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.01.
47. Johnson J.D., Suzuki M., Rugg M.D. Recollection, familiarity, and content-sensitivity in lateral parietal cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:219. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00219.
48. Jones K., Berryhill M. Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty. Front. Psychiatry 2012, 3(81):1-11. 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00081.
49. Jones, K.T., Gözenman, F., Berryhill, M.E., 2014. Enhanced long-term memory encoding after parietal neurostimulation, Exp. Brain. Res. (in press).
50. Kahn I., Davachi L., Wagner A.D. Functional-neuroanatomic correlates of recollection: implications for models of recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24(17):4172-4180. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0624-04.2004.
51. Kempe R., Huang Y., Parra L.C. Simulating pad-electrodes with high definition arrays in transcranial electric stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 2014, 11(2):026003. 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/02600.
52. Kim H., Cabeza R. Trusting our memories: dissociating the neural correlates of confidence in veridical versus illusory memories. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(45):12190-12197. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3408-07.200.
53. Kim H., Cabeza R. Common and specific brain regions in high-versus low-confidence recognition memory. Brain Res. 2009, 1282:103-113. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.080.Common.
54. Leube D.T., Erb M., Grodd W., Bartels M., Kircher T.T.J. Successful episodic memory retrieval of newly learned faces activates a left fronto-parietal network. Cognit. Brain Res. 2003, 18(1):97-101. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.008.
55. Manenti R., Brambilla M., Petesi M., Ferrari C., Cotelli M. Enhancing verbal episodic memory in older and young subjects after non-invasive brain stimulation. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2013, 5:49. 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00049.
56. Marshall L., Mölle M., Siebner H.R., Born J. Bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation slows reaction time in a working memory task. BMC Neurosci. 2005, 6:23.
57. Moos K., Vossel S., Weidner R., Sparing R., Fink G.R. Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(46):16360-16368. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6233-11.2012.
58. Monti A., Cogiamanian F., Marceglia S., Ferrucci R., Mameli F., Mrakic-Sposta S., Vergari M., Zago S., Priori A. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79(4):451-453. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.13527.
59. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 2000, 527(Pt 3):633-639.
60. Nitsche M.A., Seeber A., Frommann K., Klein C.C., Rochford C., Nitsche M.S., Fricke K., Liebetanz D., Lang N., Antal A., Paulus W., Tergau F. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 2005, 568(Pt 1):291-303. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429.
61. Nitsche M.A., Cohen L.G., Wassermann E.M., Priori A., Lang N., Antal A., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008, 1(3):206-223. 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004.
62. O'Connor A.R., Sanghoon H., Dobbins I.G. The inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory: expectancy violation or successful retrieval?. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(8):2924-2934. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4225-09.2010.
63. Peirce J.W. Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Front. Neuroinform. 2009, 2:10. 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008.
64. Ratcliff R., Clark S., Shiffrin R.M. The list-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 1990, 16:163-178.
65. Reato D., Rahman A., Bikson M., Parra L.C. Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(45):15067-15079. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2059-10.2010.
66. Roediger Henry L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 1995, 21(4):803-814.
67. Ross L.A., McCoy D., Coslett H.B., Olson I.R., Wolk D.A. Improved proper name recall in aging after electrical stimulation of the anterior temporal lobes. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2011, 3(16):1-8. 10.3389/fnagi.2011.00016.
68. Schoo L.A., van Zandvoort M.J.E., Biessels G.J., Kappelle L.J., Postma A., de Haan E.H.F. The posterior parietal paradox: why do functional magnetic resonance imaging and lesion studies on episodic memory produce conflicting results?. J. Neuropsychol. 2011, 5(Pt 1):15-38. 10.1348/174866410×504059.
69. Sestieri C., Capotosto P., Tosoni A., Luca Romani G., Corbetta M. Interference with episodic memory retrieval following transcranial stimulation of the inferior but not the superior parietal lobule. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(5):900-906. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.023.
70. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. Motion perception: seeing and deciding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1996, 93(2):628-633. 10.1073/pnas.93.2.628.
71. Simons J.S., Peers P.V., Mazuz Y.S., Berryhill M.E., Olson I.R. Dissociation between memory accuracy and memory confidence following bilateral parietal lesions. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(2):479-485. 10.1093/cercor/bhp116.
72. Sparing R., Mottaghy F.M. Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)-from insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction. Methods 2008, 44:329-337. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.02.001.
73. Stagg C.J., Nitsche M.A. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011, 17(1):37-53. 10.1177/1073858410386614.
74. Strong E.K. The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 1912, 19:447-462.
75. Suzuki M., Johnson J.D., Rugg M.D. Decrements in hippocampal activity with item repetition during continuous recognition: an fMRI study. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2011, 23:1522-1532. (Epub 2010 Jul 9). 10.1162/jocn.2010.21535.
76. Tanoue R.T., Jones K.T., Peterson D.J., Berryhill M.E. Differential frontal involvement in shifts of internal and perceptual attention. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6(4):675-682. 10.1016/j.brs.2012.11.003.
77. Toschi N., Welt T., Guerrisi M., Keck M.E. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue: clinical impact on focality, reproducibility and true sham stimulation. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2009, 43(3):255-264. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.04.008.
78. Tseng P., Hsu T.Y., Chang C.F., Tzeng O.J., Hung D.L., Muggleton N.G., Walsh V., Liang W.K., Cheng S.K., Juan C.H. Unleashing potential: transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(31):10554-10561. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0362-12.2012.
79. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Can. Psychol. 1985, 26:1-12.
80. Vicario C.M., Martino D., Koch G. Temporal accuracy and variability in the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Neuroscience 2013, 245:121-128. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.041.
81. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of the evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(7):1787-1799. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.004.
82. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Left parietal cortex is modulated by amount of recollected verbal information. Neuroreport 2009, 20(14):1295-1299. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283306798.
83. Vines B.W., Cerruti C., Schlaug G. Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 2008, 9:103. 10.1186/1471-2202-9-103.
84. Wagner A.D., Shannon B.J., Kahn I., Buckner R.L. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2005, 9(9):445-453. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001.
85. Wheeler M.E., Buckner R.L. Functional dissociation among components of remembering: control, perceived oldness, and content. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23(9):3869-3880.
86. Wheeler M.E., Buckner R.L. Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing. NeuroImage 2004, 21(4):1337-1349. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.001.
87. Yonelinas A.P., Otten L.J., Shaw K.N., Rugg M.D. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25(11):3002-3008. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005.