Complications after surgery for colorectal cancer affect quality of life and surgeon-patient relationship

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2014, Pages O407-O419

  Di Cristofaro, L ^a   Ruffolo, C ^b   Pinto, E ^c   Massa, M ^a   Antoniutti, M ^b   Cagol, M ^c   Massani, M ^b   Alfieri, R ^c   Costa, A ^a   Bassi, N ^b   Castoro, C ^c   Scarpa, M ^c  

^a Nottola Hospital   (Italy)

^b Regional Hospital C Foncello   (Italy)

^c VENETO INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY IOV IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic assisted colonic resection; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL BLEEDING; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE DEPRESSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEPSIS; URINE RETENTION; WOUND INFECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; ETIOLOGY; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PSYCHOLOGY; REOPERATION; SURGICAL INFECTION; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; ANXIETY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; SEPSIS; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 84911865611     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12752     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1276-99.
2. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T et al. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 15-36.
3. Becker N, Muscat JE, Wynder EL. Cancer mortality in the United States and Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2001; 127: 293-300.
4. Jehle EC, Haehnel T, Starlinger MJ et al. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 147-52; discussion 152-3.
5. Pahlman L. The rectal cancer debate. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001; 27: 439.
6. Hendren SK, Morris AM. Evaluating patients undergoing colorectal surgery to estimate and minimize morbidity and mortality. Surg Clin North Am 2013; 93: 1-20.
7. Bentrem DJ, Cohen ME, Hynes DM et al. Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 1013-20.
8. Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM et al. Effect of postdischarge morbidity and mortality on comparisons of hospital surgical quality. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 183-90.
9. Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2050-9.
10. The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 477-84.
11. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-26.
12. Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG, Monson JR. Predictors of early postoperative quality of life after elective resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 3435-42.
13. Merle V, Marini H, Rongere J, Tavolacci MP, Scotté M, Czernichow P. Does an information leaflet about surgical site infection (SSI) improve recollection of information and satisfaction of patients? A randomized trial in patients scheduled for digestive surgery. World J Surg 2011; 35: 1202-11.
14. Gould MT, Langworthy MJ, Santore R et al. An analysis of orthopaedic liability in the acute care setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 407: 59-66.
15. Krause HR, Bremerich A, Rustemeyer J. Reasons for patients' discontent and litigation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 181-3.
16. Bernat JL, Peterson LM. Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 86-92.
17. Korolija D, Wood-Dauphinee S, Pointner R. Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they? Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 503-7.
18. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681-92.
19. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ 1999; 318: 318-22.
20. Janssen NBAT, Oort FJ, Fockens P, Willems DL, de Haes HCJM, Smets EMA. Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study J Med Ethics 2009; 35: 276-82.
21. Schwarze ML, Bradley CT, Brasel KJ. Surgical 'buy-in': the contractual relationship between surgeons and patients that influences decisions regarding life-supporting therapy. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 843-8.
22. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds). (2009) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition. Springer, New York.
23. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13.
24. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365-76.
25. Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W et al. Quality of life clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 3017-26.
26. Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby J, for the EORTC QOL Study Group. An international prospective study of the psychometric properties of the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 in assessing cancer patient perception of the quality of care received in the hospital. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 2120-31.
27. Bredart A, Coens C, Aaronson N et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology settings from European and Asian countries: preliminary results based on the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 323-30.
28. Scarpa M, Erroi F, Ruffolo C et al. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life, body image, cosmesis, and functional results. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 577-82.
29. Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H. Laparoscopic right colectomy: five step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 267-73.
30. Scarpa M, Pagano D, Ruffolo C et al. Health-related quality of life after colonic resection for diverticular disease: long-term results. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 105-12.
31. Kiely JM, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, Shen B, Kiran RP. Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 387-92.
32. Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, Polese L et al. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: different questionnaires lead to different interpretations. Arch Surg 2007; 142: 158-65.
33. Constantinides VA, Aydin HN, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Heriot AG, Remzi FH. Long-term, health-related, quality of life comparison in patients undergoing single stage vs staged resection for complicated diverticular disease. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 663-71.
34. Markides GA, Subar D, Al-Khaffaf H. Litigation claims in vascular surgery in the United Kingdom's NHS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36: 452-7.
35. Levinson W, Chaumeton N. Communication between surgeons and patients in routine office visits. Surgery 1999; 125: 127-34.
36. Bellew M, Atkinson KR, Dixon GG et al. The introduction of a paediatric anesthesia information leaflet: an audit of its impact on parental anxiety and satisfaction. Paediatr Anesth 2002; 12: 124-30.
37. Roque I, Hochain P, Merle V et al. Evaluation de la qualité et de l'impact de l'information transmise par les fiches d'endoscopie digestive elaborées par les sociétés savantes. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2003; 27: 17-21.
38. Ulrich AB, Seiler CM, Z'graggen K, Löffler T, Weitz J, Büchler MW. Early results from a randomized clinical trial of colon J pouch versus transverse coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1257-63.
39. Den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1066-75.