Comparison of multiple parameters obtained on 3T pulsed arterial spin-labeling, diffusion tensor imaging, and MRS and the Ki-67 labeling index in evaluating glioma grading

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2091-2098

  Fudaba, H ^a   Shimomura, T ^a   Abe, T ^a   Matsuta, H ^a   Momii, Y ^a   Sugita, K ^a   Ooba, H ^a   Kamida, T ^a   Hikawa, T ^a   Fujiki, M ^a  

^a OITA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KI 67 ANTIGEN; SPIN LABELING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANAPLASTIC OLIGOASTROCYTOMA; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTOMA; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABELING INDEX; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OLIGODENDROGLIOMA; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PULSED ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIN LABELING; BRAIN TUMOR; CANCER GRADING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEUROIMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMANS; KI-67 ANTIGEN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEUROIMAGING; ROC CURVE; SPIN LABELS;

EID: 84911862655     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114:97-109
2. Warmuth C, Gunther M, Zimmer C. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;228:523-32
3. Kimura H, Takeuchi H, Koshimoto Y, et al. Perfusion imaging of meningioma by using continuous arterial spin-labeling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images and histopathologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:85-93
4. Kim HS, Kim SY. A prospective study on the added value of pulsed arterial spin-labeling and apparent diffusion coefficients in the grading of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1693-99
5. Noguchi T, Yoshiura T, Hiwatashi A, et al. Perfusion imaging of brain tumors using arterial spin-labeling: correlation with histopathologic vascular density. AJNRAmJ Neuroradiol 2008;29:688-93
6. Hirai T, Kitajima M, Nakamura H, et al. Quantitative blood flow measurements in gliomas using arterial spin-labeling at 3T: intermodality agreement and inter- and intraobserver reproducibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2073-79
7. Chawla S, Wang S, Wolf RL, et al. Arterial spin-labeling and MR spectroscopy in the differentiation of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1683-89
8. Zikou AK, Alexiou GA, Kosta P, et al. Diffusion tensor and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in glioblastoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114:607-12
9. Liu X, Tian W, Kolar B, et al. MR diffusion tensor and perfusionweighted imaging in preoperative grading of supratentorial nonenhancing gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:447-55
10. Lee EJ, Lee SK, Agid R, et al. Preoperative grading of presumptive low-grade astrocytomas on MR imaging: diagnostic value of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1872-77
11. Yang D, Korogi Y, Sugahara T, et al. Cerebral gliomas: prospective comparison of multivoxel 2D chemical-shift imaging proton MR spectroscopy, echoplanar perfusion and diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroradiology 2002;44:656-66
12. Zou QG, Xu HB, Liu F, et al. In the assessment of supratentorial glioma grade: the combined role of multivoxel protonMRspectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging. Clin Radiol 2011;66:953-60
13. Li X, Lu Y, Pirzkall A, et al. Analysis of the spatial characteristics of metabolic abnormalities in newly diagnosed glioma patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:229-37
14. Di Costanzo A, Scarabino T, Trojsi F, et al. Multiparametric 3T MR approach to the assessment of cerebral gliomas: tumor extent and malignancy. Neuroradiology 2006;48:622-31
15. Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1989-98
16. Weber MA, Zoubaa S, Schlieter M, et al. Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumors. Neurology 2006;66:1899-906
17. Roy B, Gupta RK, Maudsley AA, et al. Utility of multiparametric 3-T MRI for glioma characterization. Neuroradiology 2013;55:603-13
18. Server A, Kulle B, Gadmar ØB, et al. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas. Eur J Radiol 2011:80:462-70
19. Johannessen AL, Torp SH. The clinical value of Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index in human astrocytomas. Pathol Oncol Res 2006;12:143-47
20. Guillevin R, Menuel C, Duffau H, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts proliferative activity in diffuse low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 2008;87:181-87
21. Yin Y, Tong D, Liu X, et al. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67 in the diagnosis of gliomas. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 2012:34:503-08
22. Luh WM, Wong EC, Bandettini PA, et al. QUIPSS II with thin-slice TI1 periodic saturation: a method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:1246-54
23. Fink JR, Carr RB, Matsusue E, et al. Comparison of 3 Tesla proton MRspectroscopy,MRperfusion andMRdiffusion for distinguish-ing glioma recurrence from posttreatment effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:56-63
24. Magalhaes A, Godfrey W, Shen Y, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors correlated with pathology. Acad Radiol 2005;12:51-57
25. Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2002;223:11-29
26. Järnum H, Steffensen EG, Knutsson L, et al. Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010;52:307-17
27. Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191:41-51
28. ∗-weightedMRimaging. Radiology 1999;211:791-98
29. Kim MJ, Kim HS, Kim JH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of pulsed arterial spin labeling for glioma grading. Acta Radiol 2008;49:450-57
30. Sharma S, Sharma MC, Gupta DK, et al. Angiogenic patterns and their quantitation in high grade astrocytic tumors. J Neurooncol 2006;79:19-30
31. Calvar JA, Meli FJ, Romero C, et al. Characterization of brain tumors by MRS, DWI and Ki-67 labeling index. J Neurooncol 2005;72: 273-80