American men’s and women’s beliefs about gender discrimination: For men, it’s not quite a zero-sum game;Creencias de los hombres y mujeres americanos sobre la discriminación de género: Para los hombres, esto no es precisamente un juego de suma zero

Masculinities and Social Change

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 210-239

  Vandello, Joseph A ^a   Michniewicz, Kenneth S ^a   Lenes, Joshua Guy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Gender discrimination; Intergroup conflict; Political ideology; Sexism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911443673     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20143605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4471/MCS.2012.14     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The 20-item RWA scale. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241-253. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241.
4. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution ofcooperation. New York: Basic Books.
5. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The perils of political correctness: Men’s and women’s responses to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 75-88. doi:10.1177/019027250506800106.
6. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms ofAmerican family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Bosker, B. (2012). Fortune 500 list boasts more female CEOs than ever before. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/201 2/05/07/fortune-500-femaleceos_ n_1495734.html.
8. Bosson, J. K., & Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 82-86. doi:10.1177/0963721411402669.
9. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980.
10. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2008). Changes in women’s labor force participation in the 20th century. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2000/feb/wk3/art03.htm.
11. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2011). Women in the labor force: A databook. Retrieved from: http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2011.pdf.
12. Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 283-311). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
13. CBS News (2009). Poll: Women’s movement worthwhile. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main9 65224.shtml.
14. Center for American Women and Politics (2012). Women in elective office 2012. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf.
15. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(3), 249-253. doi:10.1177/014662168300700301.
16. Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 223-230. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x.
17. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The condition of Education 2010, Table A-23-2 (NCES 201 0-028). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010028.pdf.
18. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution ofwomen and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735.
19. Eibach, R. P., & Ehrlinger, J. (2006). Reference points in men’s and women’s judgments of progress toward gender equality. Sex Roles, 63, 882-893. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9846-7.
20. Farley, R., & Frey, W. H. (1994). Changes in the segregation ofWhites from Blacks during the 1 980s: Small steps toward a more integrated society. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 23-45. doi:10.2307/2096131.
21. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook ofsocial psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed.) (pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Gibson, J. W. (1994). Warrior dreams: Paramilitary culture in post- Vietnam America. New York: Hill andWang.
23. Glaeser, E. L., & Vigdor, J. L. (2001). Racial segregation in the 2000 Census: Promising news. Brookings Institution Survey Series. Washington: Brookings Institution.
24. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
25. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 35(3), 530-535. doi:10.1177/0361684311414832.
26. Grote, N. K., Naylor, K. E., & Clark, M. S. (2002). Perceiving the division of family work to be unfair: Do social comparisons, enjoyment, and competence matter? Journal ofFamily Psychology, 16(4), 510-522. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.510.
27. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Carter, G. L. (2005). Working women in America: Split dreams. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Hochschild, J. (1995). Facing up to the American dream: Race, class, and the soul ofthe nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307-337. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600.
30. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.
31. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126-136. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x.
32. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory ofinterdependence. New York: Wiley.
33. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views ofwhat is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
34. Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense ofpeople. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Matthews, M., Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (2009). A longitudinal test of the model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Political Psychology, 30(6), 921-936. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00733.x.
36. National Election Survey (1982). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
37. Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zerosum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 215-218. doi:10.1177/1745691611406922.
38. Peter, K., & Horn, L. (2005). Gender differences in participation and completion of undergraduate education and how they have changed over time. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/das/epubs/2005169/index.asp.
39. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
40. Pleck, J. H., & Masciadrelli, B. P. (2003). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role ofthe father in child development (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
41. Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31 (3), 369-409. doi:10.1177/0022022100031003005.
42. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998.
43. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
44. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2083433.
45. Sidanius, J., Van Laar, C., Levin, S., & Sinclair, S. (2004). Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the college campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 87, 96-110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.96.
46. Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 203-232. doi:10.1177/1088868311430825.
47. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199-214. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.
48. Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the Attitudes TowardWomen and Modern Sexism Scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 103-118. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00103.x.
49. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology ofintergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson.
50. U.S. Census Bureau (2012). Historical income tables: People. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/people/.
51. Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325-1339. doi:10.1037/a0012453.
52. Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23(4), 301-310. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00645.x.