Structural relationships among self-regulated learning, learning flow, satisfaction, and learning persistence in cyber universities

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 752-770

  Joo, Young Ju ^a   Joung, Sunyoung ^b   Kim, Jiyeon ^a  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Kookmin University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

cyber university; e learning; learner persistence; learning flow; learning satisfaction; self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911419920     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2012.745421     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
2. Chyung, Y., Winiecki, D., & Fenner, J.A. (1999). Evaluation of effective intervention to solve the dropout problem in adult distance education. Proceedings of Ed-Media 1999 (pp. 51–55), Seattle, WA.
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Derrick, M.G. (2000). The measurement of the intentions to exhibit persistence in the adult autonomous learner (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC).
6. Diaz, D. (2002). Online dropout rates revisited. Retrieved from http://technologysource.org/article/online_drop_rates_revisited/
7. Ha, Y.J., & Joo, Y.J. (2006). Relations between motivation, self-regulated learning capability and learning effectiveness related to on-line job training. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1), 57–82.
8. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
9. Harju, B.L., & Eppler, M.A. (1997). Achievement motivation, flow and irrational beliefs in traditional and nontraditional college students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24, 147–157.
10. Heo, G. (2009). A study on the structural equation model for students' satisfaction in the blended leaning environment. Journal of Korean Society for Internet Information, 10(1), 135–143.
11. Hodges, C.B. (2005). Self-regulation in web-based courses: A review and the need for research. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 375–383.
12. Hoffman, D.L., & Novak, D.L. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundation. Journal of Marketing, 60, 50–69. doi: 10.2307/1251841
13. Jang, K.R., & Park, C.H. (2002). The impact of motivation and commitment on future intentions of children toward Tae Kwon Do participation. Journal of Sport Science, 7, 22–31.
14. Joo, Y.J., Kim, N.Y., & Cho, H.K. (2008). Relationship between self-efficacy, online task value and self-regulated learning, and satisfaction and achievement in cyber education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14, 115–135.
15. Joo, Y.J., Kim, N.Y., Shim, W.J., & Kim, J.Y. (2008). Test development and verifying the validity and reliability for measuring motivation in e-Learning Environment. Journal of Corporate Education, 10(1), 47–64.
16. Joo, Y.J., Lim, K.Y., & Park, S.Y. (2011). Investigating the structural relationships among organizational support, learning flow, learners' satisfaction and learning transfer in corporate e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 973–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01116.x
17. Joo, Y., Park, S., Shim, W., & Kim, J. (2008). Development and validation of a dropout scale for the cause examination in corporate e-learning. Journal of Corporate Education, 10(2), 79–97.
18. Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Great ideas revisited. Training and Development, 50(1), 54–59.
19. Kim, I.H., & Lee, K.M. (2005). Relationship among motivation, satisfaction, flow and continuous participating intention of the adolescent judo trainees. Korean Journal of Society of Sport, 18(3), 511–526.
20. Kim, M.R. (2005). A study on factors affecting learner's motivation and satisfaction in an e-learning based graduate school course. Journal of Korean Education, 32(1), 165–201.
21. Kim, N.Y. (2009). The structural relationship among academic motivation, program, organizational support, interaction, flow and learning outcome in cyber education (Unpublished dissertation, Ewha Womans University).
22. Kim, Y.H., & Kim, Y.S. (2006). Study on the relationships among learners' individual differentiation factors, flow, language learning strategies, achievement, and satisfaction in online English writing learning. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 12, 289–314.
23. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
24. Kofoed, J. (2004). Can students improve performance by clicking more?: Engaging students through online delivery. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 1, 9–18.
25. Lee, K.N., & Choi, W.S. (2007). A study on the self-regulated learning factors affecting participation, satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of Korea Technology Education Association, 7(3), 117–148.
26. Lee, S.W. (2003). Comparing learners' with institutions' factors that influence on persistence in university lifelong education. The Journal of Lifelong Education, 9(1), 117–147.
27. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48, 185–204. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004
28. Martinez, M. (2003). High attrition rate in e-learning: Challenges, predictors, and solutions. The e-Learning Developers Journal, 1–7.
29. Martinez, P., & Monday, F. (1998). 9000 voices: Student persistence and dropout in further education. FEDA Report, 2. London, UK: Further Education Development Agency.
30. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2007). 2007 distance university evaluation report. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
31. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2009). 2009 cyber university fact report. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
32. Müller, T. (2008). Persistence of women in online degree completion programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/455/1042
33. Park, S.I., & Kim, Y.K. (2006). An inquiry on the relationships among learning – Flow factors, flow level, achievement under on-line learning environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 93–115.
34. Pintrich, P.R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
35. Rovai, A. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
36. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Shea, P., Li., C.S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college course. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175–190. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
38. Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 69–86. doi: 10.1080/01587910303048
39. Shin, N. (2006). Online learner's ‘flow’ experience: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 705–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00641.x
40. Simpson, O. (2003, November). Mature student retention – The case of the UK Open University. Paper presented at the International Student Retention Conference.
41. Skadberg, T.X., & Kimmel, J.R. (2004). Visitors' flow experience while browsing a web site: Its measurement, contributing factors and consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 403–422. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00050-5
42. Son, K.Y., & Kim, S.K. (2006). A study on the effects of trainee engagement on a web-based training in corporate settings. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 3, 61–87.
43. Zimmerman, B.J. (1990). Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 173–201. doi: 10.1007/BF01322178
44. Zimmerman, B.J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862. doi: 10.3102/00028312031004845
45. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. doi: 10.3102/00028312023004614
46. Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
47. Zirkle, C. (2004). Access barriers experienced by adults in distance education courses and programs: A review of the research literature. Paper presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference, Indianapolis, IN.