Opinion of the Panel on dietetic products, nutrition and allergies (NDA) on a request from the Commission related to scientific and technical guidance for the preparation and presentation of the application for authorisation of a health claim

EFSA Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2007, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

comprehensive review; food constituent; Health claims; human data; Regulation; substantiation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911407857     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2007.530     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Aggett PJ, Antoine JM, Asp NG, Bellisle F, Contor L, Cummings JH, Howlett J, Müller DJG, Persin C, Pijls LTJ, Rechkemmer G, Tuijtelaars S, Verhagen H (2005). Process for the Assessment of Scientific Support for Claims on Foods (PASSCLAIM): Consensus on criteria. Eur J Nutr 44 (supplement 1): 5–30.
2. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N; TREND Group (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 94:361–6.
3. Food Standards Australia and New Zealand: www.foodstandards.gov.au/foodmatters/healthnutritionandrelatedclaims/index.cfm
4. Health Canada:
5. Interim Guidance Document - Preparing a Submission for Foods with Health Claims: Incorporating Standards of Evidence for Evaluating Foods with Health Claims. www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/label-etiquet/nutrition/claims-reclam/index_e.html; http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/label-etiquet/nutrition/claims-reclam/abstract_guidance-orientation_resume_e.html
6. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, et al. (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses. Lancet 354: 1896–1900.
7. QUOROM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses) statement checklist. A checklist of items which systematic review authors can address in their review to assure readers of the reliability of the review's findings.
8. SCF (Scientific Committee for Food) (2000). Guidelines of the Scientific Committee on Food for the development of tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and minerals. Opinion expressed on 19 October 2000. ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out80_en.html
9. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283: 2008–2012.
10. The Cochrane Collaboration (2006). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 4.2.6. www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/index.htm
11. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2007). Draft Guidance for Industry: Evidence-Based Review System for the Scientific Evaluation of Health Claims; Availability. Office of Nutrition, Labeling and Dietary Supplements of the FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/hclmgui5.html