Where does social capital come from?

The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 26-52

  Wollebaek, Dag ^a   Selle, Per ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911157993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203932827     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Berman, Sheri. 1997. Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49(3): 401-429.
2. Booth, John A. and Richard, Patricia B. 2001. Civil society and political context in Central America. In Beyond Tocqueville. Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective, edited by M.W. Foley, B. Edwards and M. Diani. Hanover:University Press of New England.
3. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. The forms of capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, edited by J. G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood.
4. Dekker, Paul, and Andries van den Broek. 1998. Civil society in comparative perspective:involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas 9(1): 11-38.
5. Eliasoph, Nina. 2003. Cultivating apathy in voluntary associations. In The values of volunteering. Cross-cultural perspectives, edited by P. Dekker and L. Halman. New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
6. Foley, Michael W. and Bob Edwards. 1996. The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy 7(3): 38-52.
7. Foley, Michael W. and Bob Edwards. 1999. Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy 19(2): 141-173.
8. Foley, Michael W. and Bob Edwards. 2001. Civil society and social capital: a primer. In Beyond Tocqueville. Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective, edited by M. W. Foley, B. Edwards and M. Diani. Hanover: University Press of New England.
9. Foley, Michael W., Bob Edwards and Mario Diani. 2001. Social capital reconsidered. In Beyond Tocqueville. Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective, edited by B. Edwards, M. W. Foley and M. Diani. Hanover: University Press of New England.
10. Freitag, Markus. 2003. Social capital in (dis)similar democracies. The development of generalized trust in Japan and Switzerland. Comparative Political Studies 36 (8):936-966.
11. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
12. Galbraith, James and Enrique Garcilazo. 2005. Pay inequality in Europe 1995-2000: convergence between countries and stabilities inside. UTIP Working Paper no. 30. URL:http://utip.gov.utexas.edu/papers/utip_30.pdf (first accessed November 9, 2005).
13. Haddad, Mary Alice. 2004. Community determinates of volunteer participation and the promotion of civic health: the case of Japan. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33 (Supplement to no. 3): 8S-31S.
14. Hallenstvedt, Abraham and Jan Trollvik. 1993. Norske organisasjoner [Norwegian organizations]. Oslo: Fabritius Forlag.
15. Hooghe, Marc. 2003. Voluntary associations and democratic attitudes: value congruence as a causal mechanism. In Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective, edited by M. Hooghe and D. Stolle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16. Hooghe, Marc and Dietlind Stolle. 2003. Introduction: generating social capital. In Generating social capital., edited by M. Hooghe and D. Stolle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Jowell, J. and Central Co-ordinating Team. 2003. European Social Survey 2002-2003:technical report. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University.
19. Juknevicius, S. and A. Savicha. 2003. From restitution to innovation: volunteering in postcommunist countries. In The values of volunteering: cross-cultural perspectives, edited by P. Dekker and L. Halman. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
20. Knack, Stephen and Philip Keefer. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1251-1288.
21. Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies. Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
22. Macpherson, C. B. 1977. The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Mayer, Nonna. 2003. Democracy in France: do associations matter? In Generating social capital, edited by M. Hooghe and D. Stolle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Mutz, Diana C. 2002. Cross-cutting social networks: testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review 96(1): 111-126.
25. Newton, Kenneth. 1997. Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist 40(5): 575-586.
26. NSD, ESS data team at. 2003. ESS documentation report 2002/2003, 5th edition. Bergen:Norwegian Social Science Data Services.
27. Offe, Claus and Susanne Fuchs. 2002. A decline in social capital? The German case. In Democracies in flux, edited by R. D. Putnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Olson, Mancur. 1982. The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
29. Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31. Putnam, Robert D. 1995a. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65-78.
32. Putnam, Robert D. 1995b. Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science & Politics 28(4): 664-683.
33. Putnam, Robert D. 2000a. Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
34. Putnam, Robert D. 2000b. Introduction: what's troubling the trilateral democracies? In Disaffected democracies, edited by S. Pharr and R. D. Putnam. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
35. Putnam, Robert D. 2002. Conclusion. In Democracies in flux. The evolution of social capital in contemporary society, edited by R. D. Putnam and K. Goss. New York:Oxford University Press.
36. Putnam, Robert D. and Lewis M. Feldstein. 2003. Better together. Restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37. Quigley, Kevin F. F. 1996. Human bonds and social capital. Orbis 40(2): 333-343.
38. Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Geography, religion and social class: crosscutting cleavages in Norwegian politics. In Party systems and voter alignments. Cross-national perspectives, edited by S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan. New York: The Free Press.
39. Rothstein, Bo. 2002. Social capital in the social democratic state. In Democracies in flux. The evolution of social capital in contemporary society, edited by R. D. Putnam and K. Goss. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Rothstein, Bo. 2004. Social capital and institutional legitimacy: the Corleone connection. In Investigating social capital, edited by S. Prakash and P. Selle. New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE.
41. Rothstein, Bo and Dietlind Stolle. 2003a. Introduction: social capital in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies 26(1): 1-26.
42. Rothstein, Bo and Dietlind Stolle. 2003b. Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: an institutional approach. In Generating social capital, edited by M. Hooghe and D. Stolle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Marilyn Rueschemeyer and Björn Wittrock, eds. 1998. Participation and democracy East and West: comparisons and interpretations. Armonk:M. E. Sharpe.
44. Selle, Per and Kristin Strømsnes. 2001. Membership and democracy. In Social capital and participation in everyday life, edited by P. Dekker and E. Uslaner. London: Routledge.
45. Skocpol, Theda. 1996. Unravelling from above. The American Prospect (no. 25, March-April).
46. Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished democracy. From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
47. Stolle, Dietlind. 2001. Clubs and congregations: the benefits of joining an association. In Trust in society, edited by K. Cook. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
48. Stolle, Dietlind. 2003. The sources of social capital. In Generating social capital, edited by M. Hooghe and D. Stolle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49. Stolle, Dietlind. 2004. Communities, social capital and local government: generalized trust in regional settings. In Investigating social capital, edited by S. Prakash and P. Selle. New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE.
50. Stolle, Dietlind and Thomas R. Rochon. 1999. The myth of American exceptionalism. A three-nation comparison of associational membership and social capital. In Social capital and European democracy, edited by J. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton and P. F. Whiteley. London and New York: Routledge.
51. Strømsnes, Kristin. 2003. Folkets makt. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
52. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1968. Democracy in America/Alexis de Tocqueville; edited by J. P. Mayer and Max Lerner; a new translation by George Lawrence. Edited by J. P. Mayer and M. Lernar. London: Collins.
53. Uslaner, Eric. 2003. Trust, democracy and governance: can government policies influence generalized trust? In Generating social capital, edited by M. Hooghe and D. Stolle. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
54. Wollebæk, Dag and Per Selle. 2002a. Det nye organisasjonssamfunnet. Demokrati i omforming. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
55. Wollebæk, Dag and Per Selle. 2002b. Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope, and type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(1): 32-61.
56. Wollebæk, Dag and Per Selle. 2004a. Passive membership in voluntary organizations:implications for civil society, integration and democracy. In Investigating social capital, edited by S. Prakash and P. Selle. New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London: SAGE.
57. Wollebæk, Dag and Per Selle. 2004b. The role of women in the transformation of the voluntary sector in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33 (3 (supplemental issue)): 120-144.
58. Woolcock, Michael. 1998. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27: 151-208.