Competition law and policy in the EC and UK: Fourth edition

Competition Law and Policy in the EC and UK: Fourth Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-432

  Rodger, Barry ^a   MacCulloch, Angus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911114459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203926581     Document Type: Book

References (112)

1. Amato, G, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power, 1997, Oxford: Hart.
2. Jebsen, P and Stevens, R, 'Assumptions, goals and dominant undertakings: the regulation of competition under Art 86 of the European Union' (1996) 64 Antitrust LJ 443.
3. Willimsky, S, 'The concept(s) of competition' [1997] 1 ECLR 54.
4. Ahdar, 'Consumers, Redistribution of Income and the Purpose of Competition Law' [2002] ECLR 341.
5. Averitt, NW and Lande, RH, 'Using the "Consumer Choice" Approach to Antitrust Law' (2007) Antitrust Law Journal 175.
6. Marsden, P and Whelan, P, '"Consumer Detriment" and its Application in EC and UK Competition Law' [2007] ECLR 569.
7. Frazer, T, 'Competition policy after 1992: the next step' (1990) 53 MLR 609.
8. Gerber, D, Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe, 1998, Oxford:Clarendon.
9. Venit, J, 'Brave new world: the modernisation and decentralisation of enforcement under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty' (2003) 40(3) CML Rev 545.
10. Weitbrecht, A, 'From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond - The First 50 Years of European Competition Law' [2008] ECLR 81.
11. Lawrence, J and Moffat, J 'A dangerous new world - practical implications of the Enterprise Act 2002' [2004] 25(1) ECLR 1.
12. Maher, I, 'Juridification, codification and sanction in UK competition law' (2000) 63 MLR 544.
13. Middleton, K, 'The Americanisation of UK competition law' 2003 SL PQ 27.
14. Rodger, BJ and MacCulloch, A (eds), The UK Competition Act: A New Era for UK Competition Law, 2000, Oxford: Hart.
15. Bork, R, 'Introduction: the crisis in antitrust', in The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, 1993, Oxford: Maxwell Macmillan.
16. Fox, E, 'The new American competition policy - from antitrust to pro-efficiency' [1981] ECLR 439.
17. Kovacic, WE, 'The Intellectual DNA of Modern US Competition Law for Dominant Firm Conduct: The Chicago/Harvard Double Helix' [2007] Columbia Business Law Review 1.
18. Pitofsky, R, 'The political content of antitrust' [1979] 127 UPLR 1051.
19. Schwartz, L, 'Justice and the non-economic goals of antitrust' [1979] 127 UPLR 1076.
20. Sullivan, L, 'Antitrust, microeconomics and politics: reflections on some recent relationships' [1980] 68 Calif LR 1.
21. Brammer, S, 'Concurrent Jurisdiction under Regulation 1/2003 and the issue of case allocation' (2005) 42(5) CML Rev 1383.
22. Dekeyser, K, and Jaspers, M, 'A New Era of ECN Co-operation' (2007) 30(1) World Competition 3.
23. Gilliams, HM, 'Modernisation: from policy to practice' (2003) 28 EL Rev 451.
24. Riley, A, 'EC antitrust modernisation: the Commission does very nicely - thank you! Part one: Regulation 1 and the notification burden' [2003] ECLR 604
25. 'Part two:between the idea and the reality; decentralisation under Regulation 1' [2003] ECLR 687.
26. Venit, J, 'Brave new world: the modernization and decentralization of enforcement under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty' (2003) 40 CML Rev 545.
27. Wesseling, R, 'The Commission White Paper on modernisation of EC antitrust law:unspoken consequences and incomplete treatment of alternative options' [1999] ECLR 420.
28. Goodman, S, 'Steady as she goes: the Enterprise Act 2002 charts a familiar course for UK merger control' [2003] ECLR 331.
29. Lawrence, J and Moffat, J, 'A dangerous new world - practical implications of the Enterprise Act 2002' [2004] ECLR 1.
30. Rodger, B, 'The Competition Act and the Enterprise Act 2002 Reforms: Sanctions and Deterrence in UK Competition Law, in Dannecker, G, and Jansen, O, (eds), Competition Law Sanctioning in the European Union, The EU Influence on the National System of Sanctions in the European Area, 2003, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
31. Rodger, BJ and MacCulloch, A, The UK Competition Act: A New Era for UK Competition Law, 2000, Oxford: Hart.
32. Wilks, S, In the Public Interest: Competition Policy and the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, 1999, Manchester: MUP.
33. Brkan, M, 'Procedural Aspects of Private Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law: Heading Toward New Reforms?' (2005) 28(4) World Competition 479.
34. Eilmansberger, T, 'The Green Paper on Damages for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules and Beyond: Reflections on the Utility and Feasibility of Stimulating Private Enforcement through Legislative Action' (2007) 44(2) CMLRev 431.
35. Hodges, C, 'Competition Enforcement, Regulation and Civil Justice: What is the Case?' (2006) 43(5) CMLRev 1381.
36. Jones, CA, 'Private antitrust enforcement in Europe: a policy analysis and reality check' (2004) 27(1) World Competition 13.
37. Komninos, A, 'New prospects for private enforcement of EC competition law:Courage v Crehan and the Community right to damages' (2002) 39 CML Rev 447-87.
38. Kon, S, and Maxwell, A, 'Enforcement in national courts of the EC and new UK competition rules: obstacles to effective enforcement' [1998] ECLR 443.
39. Rodger, BJ, 'Private enforcement and the Enterprise Act: an exemplary system of awarding damages?' [2003] ECLR 103.
40. Singla, T, 'The Remedies (Not) Available for Breaches of Article 81 EC' [2008] ECLR 201.
41. Wils, W, 'Should private antitrust enforcement be encouraged in Europe?' (2003) 26 World Competition 473.
42. Amato, F, 'International Antitrust: What Future?' (2001) 24(4) World Competition 451.
43. Canenbley, C, and Rosenthal, M, 'Co-operation between Antitrust Authorities In-and Outside the EU: What does it mean for multinational corporations?' Part 1 [2005] ECLR 106; Part 2 [2005] ECLR 178.
44. Maher, I, 'Competition law in the international domain: networks as a new form of governance' [2002] Journal of Law and Society 111.
45. Von Meibom, W, and Geiger, A, 'A world competition law as an ultima ratio' [2002] ECLR 445.
46. Azevedo, JP, and Walker, M, 'Dominance: meaning and measurement' [2002] ECLR 363.
47. Eilmansberger, T, 'How to Distinguish Good from Bad Competition under Article 82 EC: In Search of Clearer and More Coherent Standards for Anti-competitive Abuses' (2005) 42(1) CMLRev 129.
48. Gormsen, L, 'Article 82 EC, where are we coming from and where are we going?' (2005) 2(2) CompLRev 5.
49. Jebson, D, and Stephens, R, 'Assumptions, goals and dominant undertakings: the regulation of competition under Art 86 of the European Union' (1996) 64 Antitrust LJ 443.
50. Gal, MS, 'Below-Cost Price Alignment: Meeting or Beating Competition? The France Telecom Case' [2007] ECLR 382.
51. Hamann, H-G, and Bergmann, E, 'The Granting of Rebates by Dominant Undertakings under Article 82 of the EC Treaty' [2005] ECLR 83.
52. Ridyard, D, 'Exclusionary Pricing and Price Discrimination Abuses under Article 82 - An Economic Analysis' [2002] ECLR 286.
53. Roques, C, 'CFI Judgment, Case T-203/01, Manufacture Francaise des Pneumatiques Michelin v Commission' [2004] ECLR 688.
54. Bergman, M, 'The Bronner Case - A turning point for the essential facilities doctrine' [2000] ECLR 59.
55. Killick, J, 'IMS and Microsoft judged in the cold light of IMS' (2004) 1(2) Comp LRev 23.
56. Müller, U, and Rodenhausen, A, 'The Rise and Fall of the Essential Facility Doctrine' [2008] ECLR 310.
57. Ong, B, 'Building Brick Barricades and other Barriers to Entry: Abusing a Dominant Position by Refusing to Licence Intellectual Property Rights' [2005] ECLR 213.
58. Vezzoso, S, 'The Incentives Balance Test in the EU Microsoft Case: A pro-Innovation "Economics based" Approach' [2006] ECLR 382.
59. Kon, S, and Turnbull, S, 'Pricing and the dominant firm: implications of the Competition Commission Appeal Tribunal's judgment in the Napp case' [2003] ECLR 70.
60. Rodger, B, 'Early steps to a mature competition law system: case law developments in the first eighteen months of the Competition Act 1998' [2002] ECLR 52.
61. Sufrin, B, 'The Chapter II prohibition', in Rodger, BJ, and MacCulloch, A, (eds), The UK Competition Act: A New Era for UK Competition Law, 2000, Oxford: Hart.
62. Morris, D, 'The Enterprise Act 2002: aspects of the new regime' [2002] Comp Law 318.
63. Sufrin, B and Furse, M, 'Market investigations' [2002] Comp Law 244.
64. Bouterse, RB, Competition and Integration - What Goals Count? EEC Competition Law and Goals of Industrial, Monetary and Cultural Policy, 1994, The Hague:Kluwer Law International.
65. Ehlermann, CD, 'The modernisation of EC antitrust policy: a legal and cultural revolution' (2000) 37 CML Rev 537.
66. Odudu, O, The Boundaries of EC Competition Law: The Scope of Article 81, 2006, Oxford: OUP.
67. Rodger, BJ and MacCulloch, A (eds), The UK Competition Act: A New Era for UK Competition Law, 2000, Oxford: Hart; in particular Chapter 1
68. Whish, R, 'The Competition Act 1998 and the prior debate on reform' Chapter 4
69. MacNeil, I, 'Investigations under the Competition Act 1998' and Chapter 8
70. Rodger, BJ and MacCulloch, A, 'The Chapter I prohibition: prohibiting cartels? Or permitting vertical? Or both?'
71. Bork, R, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, 1993, Oxford: Maxwell Macmillan, Chapters 14 and 15.
72. Comanor, WS, 'Vertical price fixing, vertical market restrictions and the new antitrust policy' (1985) 98 Harv L Rev 983.
73. Gyselen, L, 'Vertical restraints in the distribution process: strength and weakness of the free rider rationale under EEC competition law' (1984) 21 CML Rev 647.
74. Hawk, B, 'System failure: vertical restraints and EC competition law' (1995) 32 CML Rev 973.
75. Rodger, B, 'The big chill for national courts: reflections on market foreclosure and freezer exclusivity under Article 81 EC' (2004) 11(1) Irish Journal of European Law 77.
76. Whish, R, 'Regulation 2790/99: the Commission's "new style" block exemption for vertical restraints' (2000) 37 CML Rev 887.
77. Harding, C and Joshua, J, Regulating Cartels in Europe: A Study of Legal Control of Corporate Delinquency, 2003, Oxford: OUP.
78. Leslie, CR, 'Trust, Distrust, and Antitrust' (2004) 82(3) Texas LRev 515.
79. Connor, JM and Lande, RH, 'The Size of Cartel Overcharges: Implications for US and EU fining policies' (2006) 51(4) Antitrust Bulletin 983.
80. Motta, M, 'On Cartel Deterrence and Fines in the European Union' [2008] ECLR 209.
81. Wils, WPJ, 'Optimal Antitrust Fines: Theory and Practice' (2006) 29(2) World Comp 183.
82. Dayagi-Epstein, O, 'Representation of Consumer Interests by Consumer Associations - Salvation for the Masses' (2006) 3(2) CompLRev 209.
83. Nebbia, P, 'Damages Actions for the Infringement of EC Competition Law: compensation or deterrence?' (2008) 33(1) ELRev 23.
84. MacCulloch, A, 'Honesty, Morality and the Cartel Offence' [2007] ECLR 355.
85. Sandhu, JS, 'The European Commission's Leniency Policy: a success?' [2007] ECLR 148.
86. Bankes, C, and Hadden, M, UK Merger Law and Practice, 2006, London: LexisNexis Butterworths.
87. Cook, J, and Kerse, C, UK Merger Control, 4th edn, 2005, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
88. Navarro, E, Font, A, Folguera, J, and Briones, J, Merger Control in the EU: Law, Economics and Practice, 2nd edn, 2005, Oxford: OUP.
89. Scott, A, Hviid, M, and Lyons, B, Merger Control in the UK, 2006 Oxford: OUP.
90. Burnley, R, 'Who's afraid of Conglomerate Mergers? A Comparison of the US and EC approaches' (2005) 28(1) World Comp 43.
91. Connolly, J, Rab, S, and McElwee, M, 'Pre-Notification Referral under the EC Merger Regulation: Simplifying the route to the one-stop shop' [2007] ECLR 167.
92. Fountoukakos, K, and Ryan, S, 'A New Substantive Test for EU Merger Control' [2005] ECLR 277.
93. Luescher, C, 'Efficiency considerations in European merger control - just another battle ground for the European Commission, economics and competition lawyers?' [2004] ECLR 72.
94. Maudhuit, S, and Soames, T, 'Changes in EU Merger Control' 3 parts: Part 1 [2005] ECLR 57; Part 2 [2005] ECLR 75; Part 3 [2005] ECLR 144.
95. Nikpay, A, and Houwen, F, 'Tour de force or a little local turbulence? A heretical view on the Airtours judgment' [2003] ECLR 193.
96. Schmidt, J, 'The New ECMR: "significant impediment" or "significant improvement"?' (2004) 41(6) CMLRev 1555.
97. Goodman, S, 'Steady as she goes: the Enterprise Act charts a familiar course for UK merger control' [2003] ECLR 331.
98. Rodger, BJ, 'UK merger control: politics, the public interest and reform' [2000] ECLR 24.
99. Went, D, 'Recent Developments in UK Merger Control - Establishment of Solid Foundations for the New Regime' [2007] ECLR 627.
100. Prosser, T, The Limits of Competition Law. Markets and Public Services, 2005, Oxford: OUP.
101. Szyszczak, E, The Regulation of the State in Competitive Markets in the EU, 2007, Oxford: Hart.
102. Abbamonte, G, 'Market economy investor principle: a legal analysis of an economic problem' [1996] 4 ECLR 258.
103. Biondi, A, Eckhout, P, and Flynn, J (eds), The Law of State Aid in the European Union, 2004, Oxford: OUP.
104. Bishop, SB, 'State aids: Europe's spreading cancer' [1995] ECLR 331.
105. Hancher, L, Ottervanger, TR, and Slot, PJ, EC State Aids, 3rd edn, 2006, London:Sweet & Maxwell.
106. Louis, F, and Vallery, A, 'Ferring Revisited: the Altmark Case and State Financing of Public Services Obligations' (2004) 57 World Competition 53.
107. Ross, M, 'State aids and national courts: definitions and other problems - a case of premature emancipation' (2000) 37 CML Rev 401.
108. Bacon, K, 'State regulation of the market and EC competition rules: Articles 85 and 86 compared' [1997] 5 ECLR 283.
109. Boeger, N, 'Solidarity and EC Competition Law' (2007) 32(3) ELRev 319.
110. Ehle, D, 'State regulation under the US antitrust State action doctrine and under EC competition law: a comparative analysis' [1998] 6 ECLR 380.
111. Gagliardi, AF, 'United States and European Union antitrust versus State regulation of the economy: is there a better test?' (2000) 25 EL Rev 353.
112. Van de Gronden, JW, 'Purchasing care: economic activity or service of general (economic) interest?' [2004] ECLR 87.