Should the Neurointensive Care Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients be Individualized According to Autoregulation Status and Injury Subtype?

Neurocritical Care

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 259-265

  Johnson, Ulf ^a   Lewén, Anders ^a   Ronne Engström, Elisabeth ^a   Howells, Tim ^a   Enblad, Per ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cerebral perfusion pressure; Cerebrovascular pressure autoregulation; Head injury; Outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOREGULATION; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; BRAIN PERFUSION; CEREBRAL PRESSURE REACTIVITY INDEX; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARSHALL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFUSION PRESSURE; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRAIN CIRCULATION; BRAIN INJURIES; CLASSIFICATION; HOMEOSTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRAIN INJURIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84911008027     PISSN: 15416933     EISSN: 15560961     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-014-9954-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aaslid R, Lindegaard KF, Sorteberg W, Nornes H. Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans. Stroke. 1989;20(1):45–52.
2. Czosnyka M, Brady K, Reinhard M, Smielewski P, Steiner LA. Monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation: facts, myths, and missing links. Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(3):373–86.
3. Lang EW, Chesnut RM. A bedside method for investigating the integrity and critical thresholds of cerebral pressure autoregulation in severe traumatic brain injury patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2000;14(2):117–26.
4. Howells T, Elf K, Jones PA, et al. Pressure reactivity as a guide in the treatment of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with brain trauma. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(2):311–7.
5. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IX. Cerebral perfusion thresholds. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S59–64.
6. Steiner LA, Coles JP, Johnston AJ, et al. Assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation in head-injured patients: a validation study. Stroke. 2003;34(10):2404–9.
7. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(1):11–7; discussion 7-9.
8. Hiler M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, et al. Predictive value of initial computerized tomography scan, intracranial pressure, and state of autoregulation in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(5):731–7.
9. Sanchez-Porras R, Santos E, Czosnyka M, Zheng Z, Unterberg AW, Sakowitz OW. ‘Long’ pressure reactivity index (L-PRx) as a measure of autoregulation correlates with outcome in traumatic brain injury patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(9):1575–81.
10. Zweifel C, Lavinio A, Steiner LA, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with head injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(4):E2.
11. Marshall LF. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:S14–20.
12. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1(7905):480–4.
13. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573–85.
14. Brady KM, Shaffner DH, Lee JK, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1205–12.
15. Dengler J, Frenzel C, Vajkoczy P, Horn P, Wolf S. The oxygen reactivity index and its relation to sensor technology in patients with severe brain lesions. Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(1):74–8.
16. Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Iyer V, Piechnik S, Whitehouse H, Pickard J. Computerised transient hyperaemic response test–a method for the assessment of cerebral autoregulation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(5):599–611.
17. Panerai RB, Kerins V, Fan L, Yeoman PM, Hope T, Evans DH. Association between dynamic cerebral autoregulation and mortality in severe head injury. Br J Neurosurg. 2004;18(5):471–9.
18. Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, de Riva N, et al. The relationship between cerebral blood flow autoregulation and cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(3):652–60; discussion 60-1.
19. Sorrentino E, Diedler J, Kasprowicz M, et al. Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2012;16(2):258–66.
20. Johnson U, Nilsson P, Ronne-Engstrom E, Howells T, Enblad P. Favorable outcome in traumatic brain injury patients with impaired cerebral pressure autoregulation when treated at low cerebral perfusion pressure levels. Neurosurgery. 2010;68(3):714–21; discussion 21-2.
21. Asgeirsson B, Grande PO, Nordstrom CH. A new therapy of post-trauma brain oedema based on haemodynamic principles for brain volume regulation. Intensive Care Med. 1994;20(4):260–7.
22. Marmarou A, Signoretti S, Aygok G, Fatouros P, Portella G. Traumatic brain edema in diffuse and focal injury: cellular or vasogenic? Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;96:24–9.
23. Barzo P, Marmarou A, Fatouros P, Hayasaki K, Corwin F. Contribution of vasogenic and cellular edema to traumatic brain swelling measured by diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(6):900–7.
24. Wei XE, Wang D, Li MH, Zhang YZ, Li YH, Li WB. A useful tool for the initial assessment of blood-brain barrier permeability after traumatic brain injury in rabbits: dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1645–50; discussion 50-1.
25. Wei XE, Zhang YZ, Li YH, Li MH, Li WB. Dynamics of rabbit brain edema in focal lesion and perilesion area after traumatic brain injury: a MRI study. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(14):2413–20.
26. Chieregato A, Compagnone C, Tanfani A, et al. Cerebral blood flow mapping in two different subtypes of intraparenchymal hemorrhagic traumatic lesions. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:159–64.
27. Martin NA, Patwardhan RV, Alexander MJ, et al. Characterization of cerebral hemodynamic phases following severe head trauma: hypoperfusion, hyperemia, and vasospasm. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(1):9–19.
28. Kelly DF, Kordestani RK, Martin NA, et al. Hyperemia following traumatic brain injury: relationship to intracranial hypertension and outcome. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):762–71.
29. Ojha BK, Jha DK, Kale SS, Mehta VS. Trans-cranial Doppler in severe head injury: evaluation of pattern of changes in cerebral blood flow velocity and its impact on outcome. Surg Neurol. 2005;64(2):174–9; discussion 9.
30. Macfarlane R, Moskowitz MA, Sakas DE, Tasdemiroglu E, Wei EP, Kontos HA. The role of neuroeffector mechanisms in cerebral hyperperfusion syndromes. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(6):845–55.
31. De Salles AA, Muizelaar JP, Young HF. Hyperglycemia, cerebrospinal fluid lactic acidosis, and cerebral blood flow in severely head-injured patients. Neurosurgery. 1987;21(1):45–50.
32. Sakas DE, Bullock MR, Patterson J, Hadley D, Wyper DJ, Teasdale GM. Focal cerebral hyperemia after focal head injury in humans: a benign phenomenon? J Neurosurg. 1995;83(2):277–84.
33. Dias C, Maia I, Cerejo A, et al. Pressures, flow, and brain oxygenation during plateau waves of intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care. 2013;. doi:10.1007/s12028-013-9918-y.
34. Kelly DF, Martin NA, Kordestani R, et al. Cerebral blood flow as a predictor of outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(4):633–41.
35. Chieregato A, Noto A, Tanfani A, Bini G, Martino C, Fainardi E. Hyperemia beneath evacuated acute subdural hematoma is frequent and prolonged in patients with an unfavorable outcome: a xe-computed tomographic study. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(4):705–17; discussion 17-8.
36. Caricato A, Pitoni S. Is it time for an autoregulation-oriented therapy in head-injured patients? Crit Care Med. 2012;40(8):2526–7.
37. Elf K, Nilsson P, Ronne-Engstrom E, Howells T, Enblad P. Cerebral perfusion pressure between 50 and 60 mmHg may be beneficial in head-injured patients: a computerized secondary insult monitoring study. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(5):962–71; discussion-71.