Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1906-1916

  You, Xiao Yue ^a   You, Jian Xin ^a,b   Liu, Hu Chen ^a,b   Zhen, Lu ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Group decision making; Interval 2 tuple; Supplier selection; VIKOR method

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LINGUISTICS;

2-TUPLE; 2-TUPLE LINGUISTIC INFORMATIONS; GROUP DECISION MAKING; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS; QUALITATIVE CRITERIA; SUPPLIER SELECTION; VIKOR METHOD;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84910677755     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abdollahi, M., Razmi, J., & Arvan, M. (2015). An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile? Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 679-690.
2. Bidhandi, H. M., Yusuff, R. M., Ahmad, M. M. H. M., & Abu Bakar, M. R. (2009). Development of a new approach for deterministic supply chain network design. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(1), 121-128.
3. Boran, F. E., Genc¸, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.
4. Büyüközkan, G., & Çifc¸i, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.
5. Chai, J., Liu, J. N. K., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872-3885.
6. Chen, C. T., & Tai, W. S. (2005). Measuring the intellectual capital performance based on 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic information. In Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of Asia Pacific region of decision sciences institute. Taiwan.
7. Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289-301.
8. Chu, T. C., & Varma, R. (2012). Evaluating suppliers via a multiple levels multiple criteria decision making method under fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(2), 653-660.
9. Deng, Y., & Chan, F. T. S. (2011). A new fuzzy dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9854-9861.
10. Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2014). Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(1), 156-167.
11. Guo, X., Zhu, Z., & Shi, J. (2014). Integration of semi-fuzzy SVDD and CC-Rule method for supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4, Part 2), 2083-2097.
12. Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6), 746-752.
13. Ho, L. H., Feng, S. Y., Lee, Y. C., & Yen, T. M. (2012). Using modified IPA to evaluate supplier's performance: Multiple regression analysis and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 7102-7109.
14. Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24.
15. Jadidi, O., Zolfaghari, S., & Cavalieri, S. (2014). A new normalized goal programming model for multi-objective problems: A case of supplier selection and order allocation. International Journal of Production Economics, 148, 158-165.
16. Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (in press). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076.
17. Kannan, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. d. S., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 432-447.
18. Kar, A. K. (2014). Revisiting the supplier selection problem: An integrated approach for group decision support. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6), 2762-2771.
19. Karsak, E. E., & Dursun, M. (2014). An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 6995-7004.
20. Kumar, A., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega, 42(1), 109-123.
21. Lee, J., Cho, H., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Assessing business impacts of agility criterion and order allocation strategy in multi-criteria supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(3), 1136-1148.
22. Lima, F. R., Jr., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194-209.
23. Liou, J. J. H., Chuang, Y. C., & Tzeng, G. H. (2014). A fuzzy integral-based model for supplier evaluation and improvement. Information Sciences, 266, 199-217.
24. Liu, H. C., Li, P., You, J. X., & Chen, Y. Z. (in press). A novel approach for FMEA: Combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and grey relational analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qre.1633.
25. Liu, H. C., You, J. X., & You, X. Y. (in press). Evaluating the risk of healthcare failure modes using interval 2-tuple hybrid weighted distance measure. Computers & Industrial Engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.018.
26. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. X. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 12926-12934.
27. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Wu, J. (2013). Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights. Materials and Design, 52, 158-167.
28. Liu, H. C., Mao, L. X., Zhang, Z. Y., & Li, P. (2013). Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9), 6325-6338.
29. Liu, H. C., Ren, M. L., Wu, J., & Lin, Q. L. (2014). An interval 2-tuple linguistic MCDM method for robot evaluation and selection. International Journal of Production Research, 52(10), 2867-2880.
30. Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Fan, X. J., & Chen, Y. Z. (2014). Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 453-461.
31. Opricovic, S. (1998). Multi-Criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering.
32. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
33. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529.
34. Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (in press). Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: A grey relational analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.054.
35. Rezaei, J., Fahim, P. B. M., & Tavasszy, L. (2014). Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(18), 8165-8179.
36. Roshandel, J., Miri-Nargesi, S. S., & Hatami-Shirkouhi, L. (2013). Evaluating and selecting the supplier in detergent production industry using hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(24), 10170-10181.
37. Sanayei, A., Farid Mousavi, S., & Yazdankhah, A. (2010). Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 24-30.
38. Sawik, T. (2014). Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: Single vs. dual sourcing. Omega, 43, 83-95.
39. Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8182-8192.
40. Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., & Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7-8), 801-813.
41. Singh, A. (2014). Supplier evaluation and demand allocation among suppliers in a supply chain. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(3), 167-176.
42. Tai, W. S., & Chen, C. T. (2009). A new evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2, Part 2), 3483-3488.
43. Toloo, M., & Nalchigar, S. (2011). A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 14726-14731.
44. Vahdani, B., Jabbari, A. H. K., Roshanaei, V., & Zandieh, M. (2010). Extension of the ELECTRE method for decision-making problems with interval weights and data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 50(5-8), 793-800.
45. Vahdani, B., Mousavi, S. M., Hashemi, H., Mousakhani, M., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2013). A new compromise solution method for fuzzy group decision-making problems with an application to the contractor selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(2), 779-788.
46. Vahdani, B., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Mousavi, S. M., & Ghodratnama, A. (2013). Soft computing based on new interval-valued fuzzy modified multi-criteria decision-making method. Applied Soft Computing, 13(1), 165-172.
47. Ware, N. R., Singh, S. P., & Banwet, D. K. (2014). A mixed-integer non-linear program to model dynamic supplier selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(2), 671-678.
48. Wu, D. D. (2009). Supplier selection in a fuzzy group setting: A method using grey related analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(5), 8892-8899.
49. Yücel, A., & Güneri, A. F. (2011). A weighted additive fuzzy programming approach for multi-criteria supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6281-6286.
50. Yue, Z. (2013). An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(1-2), 112-126.
51. Yue, Z., & Jia, Y. (2013). A method to aggregate crisp values into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information for group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 13(5), 2304-2317.
52. Yu, C., & Wong, T. N. (2015). An agent-based negotiation model for supplier selection of multiple products with synergy effect. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 223-237.
53. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
54. Zeydan, M., Çolpan, C., & Çobanoʇlu, C. (2011). A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2741-2751.
55. Zhang, H. (2012). The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56(1-2), 27-35.
56. Zhang, H. (2013). Some interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators and application in multiattribute group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(6), 4269-4282.