ProcessBase: A hybrid process management platform

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8831, Issue , 2014, Pages 16-31

  Barukh, Moshe Chai ^a   Benatallah, Boualem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Business process management; Case management; Hybrid process; Service oriented architecture; Web 2.0; Web services

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SERVICES; LIFE CYCLE; PROCESS DESIGN; WEB SERVICES; WEBSITES;

BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; CASE MANAGEMENT; HYBRID PROCESS; INCREMENTAL PROCESS; PROCESS EXECUTION; STRUCTURED PROCESS; WEB 2.0; WEB 2.0 SERVICES;

SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

EID: 84910666560     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45391-9_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Marjanovic, O.: Towards is supported coordination in emergent business processes. Business Process Management Journal 11(5), 476-487 (2005).
2. Böhringer, M.: Emergent case management for ad-hoc processes: A solution based on microblogging and activity streams. In: Muehlen, M. z., Su, J. (eds.) BPM 2010 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 66, pp. 384-395. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).
3. BPTrends: Case management-combining knowledge with process (July 2009).
4. de Man, H.: Case management: A review of modelling approaches (January 2009).
5. Holz, H., Rostanin, O., Dengel, A., Suzuki, T., Maeda, K., Kanasaki, K.: Taskbased process know-how reuse and proactive information delivery in tasknavigator. In: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 522-531 (2006).
6. Barukh, M. C., Benatallah, B.: ServiceBase: A programming knowledge-base for service oriented development. In: Meng, W., Feng, L., Bressan, S., Winiwarter, W., Song, W. (eds.) DASFAA 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7826, pp. 123-138. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
7. Barukh, M. C., Benatallah, B.: A toolkit for simplified web-services programming. In: Lin, X., Manolopoulos, Y., Srivastava, D., Huang, G. (eds.) WISE 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8181, pp. 515-518. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
8. Olding, E., Rozwell, C.: Expand your bpm horizons by exploring unstructured processes. Technical Report (2009).
9. Bernstein, A.: How can cooperative work tools support dynamic group process? bridging the specificity frontier. In: CSCW, pp. 279-288. ACM, New York (2000).
10. Keen, P. G., Morton, M. S. S.: Decision support systems: an organizational perspective, vol. 35. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA (1978).
11. Vanthienen, J., Goedertier, S.: How business rules define business processes. Business Rules Journal 8(3, March) (2007).
12. Agrawal, A.: Semantics of business process vocabulary and process rules. In: Proceedings of the 4th India Software Engineering Conference, pp. 61-68. ACM (2011).
13. Milanovic, M., Gasevic, D., Wagner, G.: Combining rules and activities for modeling service-based business processes. In: 2008 12th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, pp. 11-22. IEEE (2008).
14. JBoss: jbpm, http://www. jboss. org/jbpm/.
15. RunMyProcess, https://www. runmyprocess. com/.
16. Swenson, K. D., et al.: Mastering the unpredictable. How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done.
17. Berry, P. M.: Intelligent workflow-state of the art in workflow.
18. Manolescu, D. A.: Workflow enactment with continuation and future objects. SIGPLAN Not 37(11), 40-51 (2002).
19. Wang, J., Kumar, A.: A framework for document-driven workflow systems. In: van der Aalst, W. M. P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 285-301. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).
20. Manolescu, D.: Micro-workflow: A workflow architecture supporting compositional object-oriented software development. Technical report, USA (2000).
21. Bhattacharya, K., Caswell, N. S., Kumaran, S., Nigam, A., Wu, F. Y.: Artifactcentered operational modeling. IBM Systems Journal 46(4), 703-721 (2007).
22. Cohn, D., Hull, R.: Business artifacts: A data-centric approach to modeling business operations and processes. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 32(3), 3-9 (2009).
23. Bhattacharya, K., Gerede, C. E., Hull, R., Liu, R., Su, J.: Towards formal analysis of artifact-centric business process models. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 288-304. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
24. Bhattacharya, K., et al.: A model-driven approach to industrializing discovery processes in pharmaceutical research. IBM Syst. J. 44(1), 145-162 (2005).
25. Asana: Asana project managements.
26. Richards, D.: Two decades of ripple down rules research. Knowledge Eng. Review 24(2), 159-184 (2009).