The pervasiveness and implications of statistical misconceptions among academics with a special interest in business research methods

Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 103-114

  Bezzina, Frank ^a   Saunders, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALTA   (Malta)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academics; Conceptions; Misconceptions; Research methods; Research practice; Statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910638062     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bezzina, F. (2004) "Pupils' Understanding of Probability & Statistics (14-15+): Difficulties and Insights for Instruction", Journal of Maltese Education Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 53-67.
2. Bezzina, F. & Saunders, M.N.K. (2013) "The Prevalence of Research Methodology Mis/conceptions among Business and Management Academics", in, Mesquita, A. & Ramos, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, Reading, ACPI, pp. 40-47.
3. Box, G.E.P. & Tiao, G.C. (1964) "A note on criterion robustness and inference robustness", Biometrica, Vol. 51, pp. 169-173.
4. Brown, D.E. & Clement, J. (1989) "Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning; abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction", Instructional Science, Vol. 18, pp. 237-261.
5. Bryman, A. (1988) Quality and Quantity in Social Research, Unwin Hyman, London.
6. Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods (4th edn) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2011) Business Research Methods (3rd edn), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Cole, J. C. (2008) "How to deal with missing data", in Osborne, J.W. (ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 214-238.
9. Cortina, J.M. & Landis, R.S. (2009) "When Small Effect Sizes Tell a Big Story, and When Large Effect Sizes Don't", in Lance C.E. & Vandenberg, R.J. (eds) Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends, Routledge, London, pp. 287-308.
10. Eby, L.T., Hurst, C.S. & Butts, M.M. (2009) "Qualitative Research: The Redheaded Stepchild in Organisational and Social Science Research?", in, Lance C.E. & Vandenberg, R.J. (eds) Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in Organisational and Social Sciences. Routledge, London, pp. 219-246.
11. Ellis, P.D. (2010) The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical power, Meta-Analysis and the interpretation of research results, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Field, A. (2009) Discovering Statistics using SPSS (3rd edn), SAGE, London.
13. Fisher, R.A. (1922) "On the mathematical foundation of theoertical statistics", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, Vol. 222, pp. 309-368.
14. Garfield, J.B. (1995) "How students learn statistics", International Statistics Review, Vol. 63, pp. 25-34.
15. Gel, Y., Miao, W. & Gastwirth, J.L. (2005) "The importance of checking the assumptions in underlying statistical analysis: Graphing methods for assessing normality", Jurimetrics, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 3-29.
16. Good, P.I. & Hardin, J.W. (2009) Common Errors in Statistics (and how to avoid them), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
17. Graham, A. (1994) Statistics: An Introduction, Hodder & Stoughton, London.
18. Hacking, I. (1979) Logic of Statistical inference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black. W.C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (5th edn), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
20. Hammersley, M. (1992) "The paradigm wars: Reports from the front." British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 131-143.
21. Hubbard, R. (2004) "Blurring the Distinctions Between p's and a's in Psychological Research", Theory Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 295-327.
22. Huck, S. W. (2009) Statistical Misconceptions. Psychology Press, London.
23. Huck, S.W., Cross, T.L. & Clark, S.B. (1986) "Overcoming misconceptions about z-scores", Teaching Statistics, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 38-40.
24. Krzywinski, M. & Altman, N. (2013) "Points of significance: Importance of being uncertain", Nature Methods, Vol. 10, pp. 809-810.
25. Lance, C.E. (2011), "More Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends", Organisational Research Methods, Vol.14, No. 2, pp. 279-286.
26. Lance, C.E. & Vandenberg, R. J. (2009), Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in Organisational and Social Sciences, Routledge, London.
27. Lehmann, E.L. & Casella, G. (1998) Theory of Point Estimation (2nd edn), Springer-Verlag, New York.
28. Lenth, R. V. (2000) Two Sample-Size Practices That I Don't Recommend, available at: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power/2badHabits.pdf (accessed November 28, 2013)
29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, SAGE, Beverly Hills, CA.
30. Mehta, C.R. & Patel, N.R. (2010) IBM SPSS Exact Tests, SPSS Inc., Cambridge, MA.
31. Mevareck, Z.R. (1983), "A deep structure model of students' statistical misconceptions", Educational Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 14, pp. 415-429.
32. Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G. & Guarino, A.J. (2005) Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
33. Murphy, C.O. & Davidshofer, K.R. (2004) Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications (6th edn), Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
34. Newman, D.A. (2009) "Missing Data Techniques and Low Response Rates: The Role of Systematic Nonresponse Parameters", in, Lance C.E. & Vandenberg R.J. (eds) Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends, Routledge, London, pp. 7-36.
35. Patton, M. (2002) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, SAGE, London.
36. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012) Research Methods for Business Students (6th edn), Pearson, Harlow.
37. Robson, C. (2011) Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings (3rd edn), John Wiley, Chichester.
38. Seidenfeld, T. (1979) Philosphical Problems of Statistical Inference: Learning from R.A. Fisher, D. Reidel Publ., Dordrecht, Holland.
39. Shavelson, R.J., & Towne, L. (2004) What drives scientific research in education? Questions, not methods, should drive the enterprise, American Psychological Society Observer, Vol. 17, no. 4, April 2004, [online], http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/uncategorized/what-drives-scientific-research-in-education.html
40. Smith, J. P., DiSessa, A. A. & Roschelle, J. (1993) "Misconceptions Reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition", Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 115-163.
41. Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2010) "Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research", in Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research (2nd edn), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1-41.
42. Thomas, A.B. (2004) Research Skills for Management Studies, Routledge, London.
43. Tolmie, A., Muijs, D & McAteer, E. (2011) Quantitative Methods in Education and Social Research using SPSS, Open University Press/McGraw Hill, Maidenhead, Berkshire.
44. Trochim, W. (2000). The Research Methods Knowledge Base (2nd edn), Atomic Dog Publishing, Cincinnati, OH.
45. van Belle, G. (2008) Statistical Rules of Thumb (2nd edn), Wiley, Seattle, WA.
46. von Hippel, P.T. (2005) "Mean, Median and Skew: Correcting a Textbook Rule", Journal of Statistics Education, Vol. 13, No. 2, [online], http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v13n2/vonhippel.html
47. Westen, D. & Rosenthal, R (2003) "Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 608-618.