Optimizing intersections

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 71, Issue , 2015, Pages 100-119

  Evers, Ruth ^a   Proost, Stef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Braess paradox; Priority rule; Road pricing; Signal setting; Stackelberg game

Indexed keywords

TRANSPORTATION CHARGES;

BRAESS PARADOX; OPTIMAL POLICIES; ORIGIN-DESTINATION PAIRS; PRIORITY RULES; ROAD PRICING; STACKELBERG GAMES; TRAFFIC LIGHT;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

OPTIMIZATION; ROAD PRICING; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

EID: 84910604861     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abu-Lebdeh G., Benekohal R.F. Design and evaluation of dynamic traffic management strategies for congested conditions. Transportation Research Part A 2003, 37(2)::109-127.
2. Allsop, R., 1974. Some possibilities for using traffic control to influence trip distribution and route choice. In: Transportation and Traffic Theory, Proceedings, vol. 6.
3. Allsop R., Charlesworth J. Traffic in a signal-controlled road network: an example of different signal timings including different routing. Traffic Engineering and Control 1977, 18. (Analytic).
4. Braess P.-D.D.D. Über ein paradoxon aus der verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung 1968, 12(1):258-268.
5. Cantarella G.E., Improta G., Sforza A. Iterative procedure for equilibrium network traffic signal setting. Transportation Research Part A 1991, 25(5):241-249.
6. Chen O.J., Ben-Akiva M.E. Game-theoretic formulations of interaction between dynamic traffic control and dynamic traffic assignment. Transportation Research Record 1998, 1617(1):179-188.
7. Chiou S.-W. Optimization of area traffic control for equilibrium network flows. Transportation Science 1999, 33(3):279.
8. Chiou S. A globally convergent iterative scheme for toll design network with signal settings. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2007, 187(2):1086-1099.
9. Cipriani E., Fusco G. Combined signal setting design and traffic assignment problem. European Journal of Operational Research 2004, 155(3):569-583.
10. Clegg J., Smith M., Xiang Y., Yarrow R. Bilevel programming applied to optimising urban transportation. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(1):41-70.
11. De Borger B., Proost S. Traffic externalities in cities: the economics of speed bumps, low emission zones and city bypasses. Journal of Urban Economics 2013, 76:53-70.
12. Dickson T.J. A note on traffic assignment and signal timings in a signal-controlled road network. Transportation Research Part B 1981, 15(4):267-271.
13. Fisk C. Game theory and transportation systems modelling. Transportation Research Part B 1984, 18:301-313.
14. Gartner N.H., Gershwin S.B., Little J.D., Ross P. Pilot study of computer-based urban traffic management. Transportation Research Part B 1980, 14(1):203-217.
15. Hollander Y., Prashker J.N. The applicability of non-cooperative game theory in transport analysis. Transportation 2006, 33(5):481-496.
16. Hu T.-Y., Mahmassani H.S. Day-to-day evolution of network flows under real-time information and reactive signal control. Transportation Research Part C 1997, 5(1):51-69.
17. Lee, S., Hazelton, M., 1996. Stochastic optimisation of combined traffic assignment and signal control junction modelling. In: Transportation and Traffic Theory. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France.
18. Lo H.K., Chang E., Chan Y.C. Dynamic network traffic control. Transportation Research Part A 2001, 35(8):721-744.
19. Marcotte P. Network optimization with continuous control parameters. Transportation Science 1983, 17(2):181-197.
20. Nash J. Non-cooperative games. The Annals of Mathematics 1951, 54(2):286-295.
21. Sheffi Y., Powell W.B. Optimal signal settings over transportation networks. Journal of Transportation Engineering 1983, 109(6):824-839.
22. Smith M. The existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transportation Research Part B 1979, 13(4):295-304.
23. Smith M. A local traffic control policy which automatically maximises the overall travel capacity of an urban road network. Traffic Engineering and Control 1980, 21. HS-030 129.
24. Smith M. Properties of a traffic control policy which ensure the existence of a traffic equilibrium consistent with the policy. Transportation Research Part B 1981, 15(6):453-462.
25. Smith M.J., Van Vuren T. Traffic equilibrium with responsive traffic control. Transportation Science 1993, 27(2):118.
26. Wardrop, J., 1952. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. In: Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 1, pp. 325-378.
27. Webster, F., 1958. Traffic Signal Settings. Technical Report, Road Research Technical Paper No. 39.
28. Yang H., Yagar S. Traffic assignment and signal control in saturated road networks. Transportation Research Part A 1995, 29(2):125-139.