Intraoperative sonography during open partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: Does it alter surgical management?

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 203, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 822-827

  Bhosale, Priya R ^a   Wei, Wei ^a   Ernst, Randy D ^a   Bathala, Tharakeswara K ^a   Reading, Rhoda M ^a   Wood, Christopher G ^a   Bedi, Deepak G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Imaging findings; Intraoperative ultrasound; Renal mass; Surgical management

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVENT FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY CYST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE ECHOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR INVASION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGING FINDINGS; KIDNEY TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; SURGERY; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

IMAGING FINDINGS; INTRAOPERATIVE ULTRASOUND; RENAL MASS; SURGICAL MANAGEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURVIVAL RATE; TEXAS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84910150499     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12254     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kim JM, Song PH, Kim HT, Park TC. Comparison of partial and radical nephrectomy for pT1b renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol 2010; 51:596-600
2. Novick AC. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Annu Rev Med 2002; 53:393-407
3. Becker F, Siemer S, Hack M, Humke U, Ziegler M, Stockle M. Excellent long-term cancer control with elective nephron-sparing surgery for selected renal cell carcinomas measuring more than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2006; 49:1058-1063; discussion, 1063-1064
4. Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2004; 171:1066-1070
5. Crispen PL, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Outcomes following partial nephrectomy by tumor size. J Urol 2008; 180:1912-1917
6. Margulis V, Tamboli P, Jacobsohn KM, Swanson DA, Wood CG. Oncological efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery for selected patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2007; 100:1235-1239
7. Polascik TJ, Meng MV, Epstein JI, Marshall FF. Intraoperative sonography for the evaluation and management of renal tumors: experience with 100 patients. J Urol 1995; 154:1676-1680
8. Kolla SB, Ercole C, Spiess PE, Pow-Sang JM, Sexton WJ. Nephron-sparing surgery for pathological stage T3b renal cell carcinoma confined to the renal vein. BJU Int 2010; 106:1494-1498
9. Assimos DG, Boyce H, Woodruff RD, Harrison LH, McCullough DL, Kroovand RL. Intraoperative renal ultrasonography: a useful adjunct to partial nephrectomy. J Urol 1991; 146:1218-1220
10. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB. Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol 2002; 167:61-64
11. Li QL, Guan HW, Wang FP, Jiang T, Wu HC, Song XS. Significance of margin in nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma of 4 cm or less. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008; 121:1662-1665
12. Lam JS, Bergman J, Breda A, Schulam PG. Importance of surgical margins in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008; 5:308-317
13. Rozanec JJ, Ameri C, Holst P, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery: our experience in open and laparoscopic approach in 254 cases. Arch Esp Urol 2010; 63:62-69
14. Li QL, Guan HW, Zhang QP, Zhang LZ, Wang FP, Liu YJ. Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm or less. Eur Urol 2003; 44:448-451
15. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182:1271-1279
16. Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B, et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology 2011; 78:1089-1094
17. Sun MR, Wagner AA, San Francisco IF, et al. Need for intraoperative ultrasound and surgical recommendation for partial nephrectomy: correlation with tumor imaging features and urologist practice patterns. Ultrasound Q 2012; 28:21-27
18. Kletscher BA, Qian J, Bostwick DG, Andrews PE, Zincke H. Prospective analysis of multifocality in renal cell carcinoma: influence of histological pattern, grade, number, size, volume and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy. J Urol 1995; 153:904-906
19. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 2000; 163:442-445
20. Canes D. Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18:145-149