Computational social science for the world wide web

IEEE Intelligent Systems

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 84-88

  Strohmaier, Markus ^a   Wagner, Claudia ^a  

^a GESIS LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

computational social science; emotion contagion; intelligent systems; sentiment analysis; social media; social networks

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOCIAL SCIENCES;

COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE; COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEM; EMOTION CONTAGION; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL MEDIA;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84910119317     PISSN: 15411672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2014.80     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. F.-Y. Wang et al., "Social Computing: From Social Informatics to Social Intelligence,"IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, 2007, pp. 79-83; doi: 10.1109/MIS.2007.41.
2. D. Zeng, F-Y. Wang, and K.M. Carley, "Guest Editors? Introduction: Social Computing," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 5, 2007, pp. 20-22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.4338490.
3. D. Zeng, "Social Computing: An AI Perspective," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 3, 2013, pp. 2-5; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp. jsp?arnumber=6588861.
4. N. Shadbolt et al., "Towards a Classification Framework for Social Machines," Proc. Workshop on Theory and Practice of Social Machines, 2013; http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/350513/1/socm2013-submission-9.pdf.
5. M. Strohmaier, "A Few Thoughts on Engineering Social Machines," Proc. 2013 World Wide Web Conf., 2013; www.markusstrohmaier.info/documents/a-few-thoughts-on-engineering- social-machines.pdf.
6. J. Preece, "Sociability and Usability in Online Communities: Determining and Measuring Success," Behaviour and Information Technology, vol. 20, no. 5, 2001, pp. 347-356; http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/01449290110084683.
7. D. Helic and M. Strohmaier, "Building Directories for Social Tagging Systems," Proc. 20th ACM Conf. Information and Knowledge Management, 2011, pp. 525-534.
8. D. Lazer et al., "Life in the Network: The Coming Age of Computational Social Science," Science, vol. 323, no. 5915, 2009, pp. 721-723.
9. E.J. Webb et al., Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences, Rand McNally, 1966.
10. R.M. Lee, Unobtrusive Methods in Social Research, Open Univ. Press, 2000.
11. R. Groves, "?Designed Data? and ? Organic Data?," Director?s Blog, US Census Bureau, 31 May 2011; http://directorsblog. blogs.census.gov/2011/05/31/designeddata-and-organic-data.
12. H.A. Landsberger, Hawthorne Revisited, Cornell Univ., 1958.
13. J. Ugander et al., "Structural Diversity in Social Contagion," Proc. Nat?l Academy of Science of the United States of Am., vol. 109, no. 16, 2012, pp. 5962-5966; www.pnas.org/content/109/16/5962.full.
14. J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg, "Predicting Positive and Negative Links in Online Social Networks," Proc. 19th Int?l Conf. World Wide Web, 2010, pp. 641-650.
15. S. Aral and D. Walker, "Identifying Social Cnfluence in Networks Using Randomized Experiments," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 26, no. 5, 2011, pp. 91-96.
16. R.M. Bond et al., "A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization," Nature, vol. 489, no. 7415, 2012, pp. 295-298; doi:10.1038/nature11421.
17. A.D.I. Kramer, J.E. Guillory, and J.T. Hancock, "Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks," Proc. Nat?l Academy of Science of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 24, 2014, pp. 8788-8790; www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full.
18. M.N. Meyer, "Misjudgements Will Drive Social Trials Underground," Nature, vol. 511, no. 7509, 2014, pp. 265-265; doi:10.1038/511265a.
19. T. Hwang, I. Pearce, and M. Nanis, "Socialbots: Voices from the Fronts," interactions, vol. 19, no. 2, 2012, pp. 38-45; http://doi.acm. org/10.1145/2090150.2090161.
20. C. Wagner et al., "When Social Bots Attack: Modeling Susceptibility of Users in Online Social Networks," Making Sense of Microposts, 2012; http://markusstrohmaier.info/documents/2012-MSM12-socialbots. pdf.
21. L.M. Aiello et al., "People are Strange When You?re a Stranger: Impact and Influence of Bots on Social Networks," Proc. 6th AAAI Int?l Conf. Weblogs and Social Media, 2012, pp. 10-17.
22. Emerging Technology From the arXiv, "How a Simple Spambot Became the Second Most Powerful Member of an Italian Social Network," MIT Technology Rev., 5 Aug. 2014; www.technologyreview.com/view/529696/how-a-simple-spambot-became-thesecond-most-powerful-member-of-anitalian-social-network.
23. D. Centola, "The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment," Science, vol. 329, no. 5996, 2010, pp. 1194-1197.
24. J.N. Matias, "Uncovering Algorithms: Looking Inside the Facebook News Feed," blog, 22 July 2014; http://civic. mit.edu/blog/natematias/uncovering-algorithms-looking-inside-thefacebook-news-feed.
25. H. Lietz et al., "When Politicians Talk: Assessing Online Conversational Practices of Political Parties on Twitter," The Int?l AAAI Conf. Weblogs and Social Media, 2014, pp. 132-161.
26. K. Reinecke and A. Bernstein, "Knowing What a User Likes: A Design Science Approach to Interfaces that Automatically Adapt to Culture," MIS Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, 2013, pp. 427-453; www.misq.org/skin/frontend/default/misq/pdf/V37I2/ReineckeBernstein. pdf.