Experimental validation of a rapid, adaptive robotic assessment of the MCP joint angle difference threshold

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8619, Issue , 2014, Pages 3-10

  Rinderknecht, Mike D ^a   Popp, Werner L ^a   Lambercy, Olivier ^a   Gassert, Roger ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Difference threshold; Hand function; Proprioception; Psychophysics; Robot assisted assessment; Sensory function

Indexed keywords

NEUROLOGY; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

CLINICAL ASSESSMENTS; DIFFERENCE THRESHOLD; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; HAND FUNCTION; METHOD OF CONSTANT STIMULUS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY FUNCTIONS;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 84910118020     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44196-1_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bell-Krotoski, J., Weinstein, S., Weinstein, C.: Testing sensibility, including touchpressure, two-point discrimination, point localization, and vibration. J. Hand Ther. 6(2), 114-123 (1993)
2. Jerosch-Herold, C.: A study of the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests for assessment of recovery after median nerve injury and repair. J. Hand Surg.-Brit. Eur. 28(3), 255-260 (2003)
3. Lincoln, N.B., Crow, J.L., Jackson, J.M., Waters, G.R., Adams, S.A., Hodgson, P.: The unreliability of sensory assessments. Clin. Rehabil. 5(4), 273-282 (1991)
4. Brewer, B.R., Fagan, M., Klatzky, R.L., Matsuoka, Y.: Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13(1), 1-11 (2005)
5. Tan, H.Z., Srinivasan, M.A., Reed, C.M., Durlach, N.I.: Discrimination and identification of finger joint-angle position using active motion. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. (TAP) 4(2), 10 (2007)
6. Lambercy, O., Juarez Robles, A., Kim, Y., Gassert, R.: Design of a robotic device for assessment and rehabilitation of hand sensory function. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 1-6, June 2011
7. Gescheider, G.: Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1985)
8. Watson, A.B., Fitzhugh, A.: The method of constant stimuli is inefficient. Percept. Psychophysics 47(1), 87-91 (1990)
9. Macmillan, N.A., Douglas Creelman, C.: Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (2005)
10. Taylor, M.M., Douglas Creelman, C.: PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41, 782 (1967)
11. Oldfield, R.C.: The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1), 97-113 (1971)
12. Prins, N., Kingdom, F.A.A.: Palamedes: matlab routines for analyzing psychophysical data (2009). http://www.palamedestoolbox.org
13. Taylor, M.M., Forbes, S.M., Douglas Creelman, C.: PEST reduces bias in forced choice psychophysics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 1367 (1983)