Why Siblings Are Like Darwin's Finches: Birth Order, Sibling Competition, and Adaptive Divergence within the Family

The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Sulloway, Frank J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Family dynamics; Natural selection; Niche specialization; Sibling behavior; Sibling competition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910064877     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372090.003.0004     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Altus, W. (1966). Birth order and its sequelae. Science, 151, 44-49.
2. Basket, L. M. (1985). Sibling status: Adult expectations. Developmental Psychology, 21, 441-445.
3. Beck, E., Burnet, K., & Vosper, J. (2006). Birth-order effects on facets of extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 953-959.
4. Beise, J., & Voland, E. (2002). Differential infant mortality viewed from an evolutionary biological perspective. History of the Family, 7, 515-526.
5. Belmont, L., & Marolla, F. A. (1973). Birth order, family size, and intelligence. Science, 182, 1096-1101.
6. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. S., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647-670.
7. Bjerkedal, T., Kristensen, P., Skjeret, G. A., & Brevik, J. I. (2007). Intelligence test scores and birth order among young Norwegian men (conscripts) analyzed within and between families. Intelligence, 35, 503-514.
8. Blanchard, R. (2004). Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older brothers and homosexuality in men. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 230, 173-187.
9. Boone, J. L. (1986). Parental investment and elite family structure in preindustrial states: A case study of late medieval-early modern Portuguese genealogies. American Anthropologist, 88, 859-878.
10. Bragg, A. N. (1954). Further study of predation and cannibalism in spadefoot tadpoles. Herpetologica, 20, 17-24.
11. Brown, W. L., & Wilson, E. O. (1956). Character displacement. Systematic Zoology, 5, 49-64.
12. Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221.
13. Chao, M. M. (2001). The birth-order controversy: Within-family effects and their generalizability. Unpublished honors thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
14. Clark, C., & Clark, J. (2008). Women at the polls: The gender gap, cultural politics, and contested constituencies in the United States. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
15. Clark, R. D., & Rice, G. A. (1982). Family constellations and eminence: The birth orders of Nobel Prize winners. Journal of Psychology, 110, 281-287.
16. Costa, P. T. Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, Fl.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17. Courtiol, A., Raymond, M., & Faurie, C. (2009). Birth order affects behaviour in the investment game: Firstborns are less trustful and reciprocate less. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1405-1411.
18. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19. Darwin, C. R. (1845). Journal of researches into the natural history and geology of the various countries visited during the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle round the world, under the command of Capt. Fitz Roy, R.N. 2nd ed. London: John Murray.
20. Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.London: John Murray.
21. Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. 2 vols. London: John Murray.
22. Darwin, C. R. (1903). More letters of Charles Darwin(F. Darwin and A. C. Seward, Eds). 2 vols. New York: D. Appleton.
23. Darwin, C. R. (1991). The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Volume 7:1858-1859(F. Burkhardt & S. Smith, Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Devlin, B., Daniels, M., & Roeder, K. (1997). The heritability of IQ. Nature, 388, 468-471.
26. Draper, P., & Hames, R. (2000). Birth order, sibling investment, and fertility among Ju/'Hoansi (!Kung). Human Nature, 11, 117-156.
27. Drummond, H., & García-Chavelas, C. (1989). Food shortage influences sibling aggression in the blue-footed booby. Animal Behaviour, 37, 806-818.
28. Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1990). Separate lives: Why siblings are so different. New York: Basic Books.
29. Ellis, B. J. (2004). Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: An integrated life history approach. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 920-958.
30. Ellis, B. J., & Essex, M. J. (2007). Family environments, adrenarche, and sexual maturation: A longitudinal test of a life history model. Child Development, 78, 1799-1817.
31. Ermer, E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2008). Relative status regulates risky decision making about resources in men: Evidence for the co-evolution of motivation and cognition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 106-118.
32. Ernst, C., & Angst, J. (1983). Birth order: Its influence on personality. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
33. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
34. Gargett, V. (1978). Sibling aggression in the black eagle in the Matopos, Rhodesia. Ostrich, 49, 57-63.
35. Gaulin, S. J. C., & Robbins, C. J. (1991). Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary North American society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 85, 61-69.
36. Gould, J. (1837). Remarks on a group of ground finches from Mr. Darwin's collection. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 5, 4-7.
37. Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (2008). How and why species multiply: The radiation of Darwin's finches.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Hamilton, W. D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16.
39. Hamilton, W. D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behavior. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17-32.
40. Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do.New York: Free Press.
41. Healey, M. D., & Ellis, B. J. (2007). Birth order, conscientiousness, and openness to experience: Tests of the family-niche model of personality using a within-family methodology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 55-59.
42. Herrera, N., Zajonc, R. B., Wieczorkowska, G., & Cichomski, B. (2003). Beliefs about birth rank and their reflections in reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 142-150.
43. Hertwig, R., Davis, J., & Sulloway, F. J. (2002). Parental investment: How an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 728-745.
44. Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S. N., Hoang, A., Hill, C. E., Beerli, P., & Kingsolver, J. G. (2001). Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 98, 9157-9160.
45. Horton, S. (1988). Birth order and child nutritional status: Evidence from the Philippines. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36, 341-354.
46. Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon.
47. Hrdy, S. B., & Judge, D. (1993). Darwin and the puzzle of primogeniture: An essay on biases in parental investment after death. Human Nature, 4, 1-45.
48. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592.
49. Kidwell, J. S. (1982). The neglected birth order: Middleborns. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 225-235.
50. Kingsolver, J. G., Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S. N., Hill, C. E., Hoang, A.,Gibert, P., & Beerli, P. (2001). The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist, 157, 245-261.
51. Kristensen, P., & Bjerkedal, T. (2007). Explaining the relation between birth order and intelligence. Science, 316, 1717.
52. Krishnamurthy, K. S., Uma Shaanker, R., & Ganeshaiah, K. N. (1997). Seed abortion in an animal dispersed species, Syzygium cuminii(L.) Skeels (Myrtaceae): The chemical basis. Current Science, 73, 869-873.
53. Lack, D. (1947). Darwin's finches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Lindert, P. H. (1977). Sibling position and achievement. The Journal of Human Resources, 12, 198-219.
55. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
56. Loehlin, J. C., Horn, J. M., & Willerman, L. (1990). Heredity, environment, and personality change: Evidence from the Texas Adoption Project. Journal of Personality, 58, 221-243.
57. Manaster, G. J., Rhodes, C., Marcus, M. B., & Chan, J. C. (1998). The role of birth order in the acculturation of Japanese Americans. Psychologia, 41, 155-170.
58. Michalski, R. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2002). Birth order and sexual strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 661-667.
59. Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172-175.
60. Mock, D. W. (2004). More than kin and less than kind: The evolution of family conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Mock, D.W., Drummond, H., & Stinson, C. H. (1990). Avian siblicide. American Scientist, 78, 438-449.
62. Mock, D. W., & Parker, G. A. (1997). The evolution of sibling rivalry.New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Musun-Miller, L. (1993). Sibling status effects: Parents' perceptions of their own children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 189-198.
64. Nyman, L. (1995). The identification of birth order personality attributes. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 51-59.
65. Parent, C. E., Caccone, A., & Petren, K. (2008). Colonization and diversification of Galápagos terrestrial fauna: A phylogenetic and biogeographical synthesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3347-3361.
66. Paulhus, D. L., Trapnell, P. D., & Chen, D. (1999). Birth order and personality within families. Psychological Science, 10, 482-488.
67. Petren, K., Grant, R. B., & Grant, P. R. (1999). A phylogeny of Darwin's finches based on microsatellite DNA length variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 321-329.
68. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.
69. Plomin, R., & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1-60.
70. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuffin, P. (2001). Behavioral genetics. (4th ed.) New York: Worth.
71. Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2007). Birth order and face-to-face contact with a sibling: Firstborns have more contact than laterborns. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1796-1806.
72. Puffer, R. R., & Serrano, C.V. (1973). Patterns of mortality in childhood: Report of the Inter-American Investigation of Mortality in Childhood. Washington, D. C.: Pan American Health Organization. (PAHO Scientific Publication No. 262.)
73. Rohde, P. A., Atzwanger, K., Butovskaya, M., Lampert, A., Mysterud, I., Sanchez-Andres, A., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Perceived parental favoritism, closeness to kin, and the rebel of the family: The effects of birth order and sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 261-276.
74. Rosenblatt, P. C., & Skoogberg, E. L. (1974). Birth order in cross-cultural perspective. Developmental Psychology, 10, 48-54.
75. Rowe, D. C. (1994). The limits of family influence: Genes, experience, and behavior. New York: Guildford Press.
76. Salmon, C. A. (1998). The evocative nature of kin terminology in political rhetoric. Politics and the Life Sciences, 17, 51-57.
77. Salmon, C. A. (1999). On the impact of sex and birth order on contact with kin. Human Nature, 10, 183-197.
78. Salmon, C. A. (2002). Birth order and relationships. Human Nature, 14, 73-88.
79. Salmon, C. A., & Daly, M. (1998). Birth order and familial sentiment: Middleborns are different. Human Behavior and Evolution, 19, 299-312.
80. Saroglou, V., & Fiasse, L. (2003). Birth order, personality, and religion: A study among young adults from a three-sibling family. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 19-29.
81. Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424-435.
82. Schachter, F. F. (1982). Sibling deidentification and split-parent identifications: A family tetrad. In M. E. Lamb and B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan, pp. 123-152. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83. Schachter, F. F., Gilutz, G., Shore, E., & Adler, M. (1978). Sibling deidentification judged by mothers: Cross-validation and developmental studies. Child Development, 49, 543-546.
84. Schooler, C. (1972). Birth order effects: Not here, not now! Psychological Bulletin, 78, 161-175.
85. Seward, A. C. (Ed.) (1909). Darwin and modern science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
86. Simmons, R. E. (2002). Siblicide provides food benefits for raptor chicks; Re-evaluating brood manipulation studies. Animal Behaviour, 64, F19-F24.
87. Skinner, W. G. (1992). Seek a loyal subject in a filial son: Family roots of political orientation in Chinese society. In Family process and political process in modern Chinese history, pp. 943-993, Taipei, Republic of China: Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange.
88. Sokol, D. K., Moore, C. A., Rose, R. J., Williams, C. J., Reed, T., & Christian, J. C. (1995). Intrapair differences in personality and cognitive ability among young monozygotic twins distinguished by chorion type. Behavior Genetics, 25, 457-466.
89. Suitor, J. J., & Pillemer, K. (2007). Mothers' favoritism in later life: The role of children's birth order. Research on Aging, 29, 32-55.
90. Sulloway, F. J. (1979). Geographic isolation in Darwin's thinking: The vicissitudes of a crucial idea. Studies in the History of Biology, 3, 23-65.
91. Sulloway, F. J. (1982). Darwin and his finches: The evolution of a legend. Journal of the History of Biology, 15, 1-53.
92. Sulloway, F. J. (1995). Birth order and evolutionary psychology: A meta-analytic overview. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 75-80.
93. Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.
94. Sulloway, F. J. (2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. In H. R. Holcomb III (Ed.), Conceptual challenges in evolutionary psychology: Innovative research strategies,pp. 39-83. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
95. Sulloway, F. J. (2002a). Technical report on a vote-counting meta-analysis of the birthorder literature (1940-1999). Available on-line:
96. Sulloway, F. J. (2002b). Birth order and political rebellion: An assessment, with biographical data on political activists. Available on-line:
97. Sulloway, F. J. (2007a). 'How to inherit IQ': The fetal question. The New York Review of Books, 54 (16):82.
98. Sulloway, F. J. (2007b). Birth order and intelligence. Science, 317, 1711-1712.
99. Sulloway, F. J. (2009). Sources of scientific innovation: A meta-analytic approach. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 455-459.
100. Sulloway, F. J., & Zweigenhaft, R. L. (2010). Birth order and risking taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of major league baseball. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (4), forthcoming.
101. Surbey, M. K. (1998). Parent and offspring strategies in the transition at adolescence. Human Nature, 9, 67-94.
102. Sutton-Smith, B., & Rosenberg, B. G. (1970). The sibling. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
103. Theroux, N. L. (1993). Birth order and its relationship to academic achievement and selected personal traits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
104. Trillmich, F., & Wolf, J. B. W. (2008). Parent-offspring and sibling conflict in Galápagos fur seals and sea lions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 363-375.
105. Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249-264.
106. Trivers, R. L. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
107. Trivers, R. L., & Willard, D. E. (1973). Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90-92.
108. Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavioral genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160-164.
109. Turkheimer E., & Waldron M. (2000). Nonshared environment: A theoretical, methodological, and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 78-108.
110. Voland, E. (1990). Differential reproductive success within the Krummhörn population (Germany, 18th and 19th centuries). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 65-72.
111. Voland, E. (2007). Evolutionary psychology meets history: Insights into human nature through family reconstitution studies. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology, pp. 415-432. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
112. Voland, E., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Resource competition and reproduction: The relationship between economic and parental strategies in the Krummhörn population (1720-1874). Human Nature, 26, 33-49.
113. Zajonc, R. B. (1976). Family configuration and intelligence. Science, 192, 227-236.
114. Zajonc, R. B., & Sulloway, F. J. (2007). The confluence model: Birth order as a withinfamily or between-family dynamic? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1187-1194.
115. Zweigenhaft, R. L., & Von Ammon, J. (2000). Birth order and civil disobedience: A test of Sulloway's "Born to Rebel" hypothesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 624-627.