Intercalibration of aquatic ecological assessment methods in the European Union: Lessons learned and way forward

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages 237-246

  Poikane, Sandra ^a   Zampoukas, Nikolaos ^a   Borja, Angel ^b   Davies, Susan P ^c   van de Bund, Wouter ^a   Birk, Sebastian ^d  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b MARINE RESEARCH DIVISION   (Spain)

^c Midwest Biodiversity Institute   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coastal waters; Ecological status; Intercalibration; Lakes; Rivers; Transitional waters; Water Framework Directive

Indexed keywords

SURFACE WATER;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COASTAL WATERS; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; EUROPEAN UNION; EXERCISE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LAKE; LEADERSHIP; RIVER;

EID: 84910049528     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adler R.W. The two lost books in the water quality trilogy: The elusive objectives of physical and biological integrity. Environ. Law 2003, 33:29-78.
2. ANZECC National Water Quality Management Strategy: Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality 2000, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, Australia.
3. Aubry A., Elliott M. The use of environmental integrative indicators to assess seabed disturbance in estuaries and coasts: Application to the Humber Estuary, UK. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2006, 53:175-185.
4. Birk S., Bonne W., Borja A., Brucet S., Courrat A., Poikane S., Solimini A.G., van de Bund W., Zampoukas N., Hering D. Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 18:31-41.
5. Birk S., van Kouwen L., Willby N. Harmonising the bioassessment of large rivers in the absence of near-natural reference conditions - a case study of the Danube River. Freshw. Biol. 2012, 57:1716-1732.
6. Birk S., Willby N., Kelly M.G., Bonne W., Borja A., Poikane S., van de Bund W. Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 454-455:490-499.
7. Böhmer J., Arbaciauskas K., Benstead R., Gabriels W., Porst G., Reeze B., Timm H. Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Central Baltic Lake Benthic Invertebrate Ecological Assessment Methods 2014, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
8. Borics G., Lukács B.A., Grigorszky I., László-Nagy Z., Tóth G.L., Bolgovics Á., Szabó S., Görgényi J., Várbíró G. Phytoplankton-based shallow lake types in the Carpathian basin: steps towards a bottom-up typology. Fundam. Appl. Limnol. 2014, 184:23-34.
9. Borja A., Josefson A.B., Miles A., Muxika I., Olsgard F., Phillips G., Rodríguez J.G., Rygg B. An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007, 55:42-52.
10. Borja A., Miles A., Occhipinti-Ambrogi A., Berg T. Current status of macroinvertebrate methods used for assessing the quality of European marine waters: implementing the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 2009, 633:181-196.
11. Borja A., Elliott M., Andersen J.H., Cardoso A.C., Carstensen J., Ferreira J.G., Heiskanen A.-S., Marques J.C., Neto J.M., Teixeira H., Uusitalo L., Uyarra M.C., Zampoukas N. Good Environmental Status of marine ecosystems: What is it and how do we know when we have attained it?. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 76:16-27.
12. Borja A., Elliott M., Henriksen P., Marbà N. Transitional and coastal waters ecological status assessment: advances and challenges resulting from implementing the European Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 2013, 704:213-229.
13. Brucet S., Poikane S., Lyche Solheim A., Birk S. Biological assessment of European lakes: ecological rationale and human impacts. Freshw. Biol. 2013, 58:1106-1115.
14. Buffagni A., Erba S., Furse M.T. A simple procedure to harmonize class boundaries of assessment systems at the pan-European scale. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:709-724.
15. Carvalho L., Poikane S., Lyche Solheim A., Phillips G., Borics G., Catalan J., De Hoyos C., Drakare S., Dudley B.J., Järvinen M., Laplace-Treyture C., Maileht K., McDonald C., Mischke U., Moe J., Morabito G., Nõges P., Nõges T., Ott I., Pasztaleniec A., Skjelbred B., Thackeray S.J. Strength and uncertainty of lake phytoplankton metrics for assessing eutrophication impacts in lakes. Hydrobiologia 2013, 704:127-140.
16. CWA Clean Water Act of 1972 (Codified as Amended at 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1376) 2006.
17. Davidson T.A., Bennion H., Jeppesen E., Clarke G.H., Sayer C.D., Morley D., Odgaard B.V., Rasmussen P., Rawcliffe R., Salgado J., Simpson G.L., Amsinck S.L. The role of cladocerans in tracking long-term change in shallow lake trophic status. Hydrobiologia 2011, 676:299-315.
18. Daly H.E. Ecological Economics and the Ecology of Economics 1999, Elgar Publications, UK.
19. Davies S.P., Jackson S.K. The biological condition gradient: A descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16(4):1251-1266.
20. EC Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23rd October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy 2000, Official Journal of the European Communities, European Commission, Brussels, (22 December, L 327/1).
21. EC Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Strategic Document as Agreed by the Water Directors 2001, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/objectives/pdf/strategy.pdf (accessed 13.03.13).
22. EC Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document 6. Towards a Guidance on Establishment of the Intercalibration Network and on the Process of the Intercalibration Exercise 2003, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
23. EC Commission Decision of 17 August of 2005 on the Establishment of a Register of Sites to form the Intercalibration Network in Accordance with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2005/646/EC) 2005, Official Journal of the European Communities, European Commission, Brussels, (19.09.2005, L 243/1).
24. EC Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document 14. Guidance on the Intercalibration Process 2004-2006 2005, Office for Official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
25. EC Commission Decision of 30 October 2008 Establishing, Pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, the Values of the Member State Monitoring System Classifications as a Result of the Intercalibration Exercise 2008/915/EC 2008, Official Journal of the European Communities L332/20. European Commission, Brussels.
26. EC Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy 2008.
27. EC Council Regulation No 199/2008 of 25 February 2008 CONCERNING the Establishment of a Community Framework for the Collection, Management and Use of Data in the Fisheries Sector and Support for Scientific Advice Regarding the Common Fisheries Policy 2008.
28. EC Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document 14. Guidance on the Intercalibration Process 2008-2011 2011, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
29. EC Commission Decision of 20 September 2013 Establishing, Pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Values of the Member State Monitoring System Classifications as a Result of the Intercalibration Exercise and Repealing Decision 2008/915/EC 2013, Official Journal of the European Union, (L 266/1-47).
30. Gassner H., Tischler G., Wanzenböck J. Ecological integrity assessment of lakes using fish communities - suggestions of new metrics developed in two Austrian prealpine lakes. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2003, 88:635-652.
31. Gassner H., Wanzenböck J., Zick D., Tischler G., Pamminger-Lahnsteiner B. Development of a fish based lake typology for natural Austrian lakes >50ha based on the reconstructed historical fish communities. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2005, 90:422-432.
32. Heiskanen A.S., van de Bund W., Cardoso A.C., Nõges P. Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe - interpretation and harmonisation of the concept. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49:169-177.
33. HELCOM HOLAS Workshop on Baltic Sea Pressure Index 2010, Available at: http://meeting.helcom.fi/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=16324&folderId=963302&name=DLFE-40883.pdf (accessed 25.03.13).
34. Hering D., Borja A., Carstensen J., Carvalho L., Elliott M., Feld C.K., Heiskanen A.S., Johnson R.K., Moe J., Pont D., Solheim A.L., van de Bund W. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408:4007-4019.
35. Jeppesen E., Nõges P., Davidson T.H., Haberman J., Nõges T., Blank K., Lauridsen T.L., Søndergaard M., Sayer C., Laugaste R., Johansson L.S., Bjerring R., Amsinck S.L. Zooplankton as indicators in lakes: a scientific-based plea for including zooplankton in the ecological quality assessment of lakes according to the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Hydrobiologia 2011, 676:279-297.
36. Kagalou I., Leonardos I. Typology, classification and management issues of Greek lakes: implication of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 150:469-484.
37. Kelly M. The semiotics of slime: visual representation of phytobenthos as an aid to understanding ecological status. Freshw. Rev. 2012, 5(2):105-119.
38. Kelly M. Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive. Eur. J. Phycol. 2013, 48(4):437-450.
39. Kelly M., Juggins S., Guthrie R., Jamieson J., Rippey B., Hirst H., Yallop M. Assessment of ecological status in UK rivers using diatoms. Freshw. Biol. 2008, 53:403-422.
40. Kelly M., Bennion H., Burgess A., Ellis J., Juggins S., Guthrie R. Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms. Hydrobiologia 2009, 633(1):5-15.
41. Kelly M., Urbanič G., Acs E., Bertrin V., Burgess A., Denys L., Kalhert M., Karjalainen S.M., Kennedy B., Marchetto A., Picinska-Faltynowicz J., Poikane S., Scheonfelder J., Schoenfelder I., Varbiro G. Comparing aspirations: intercalibration of ecological status concepts across European lakes using littoral diatoms. Hydrobiologia 2014, 34:125-141.
42. Kolada A., Soszka H., Cydzik D., Gołub M. Abiotic typology of Polish lakes. Limnologica 2006, 35:145-150.
43. Mascaró O., Alcoverro T., Dencheva K., Díez I., Gorostiaga J.M., Krause-Jensen D., Balsby T.J.S., Marbà N., Muxika I., Neto J.M., Nikolić V., Orfanidis S., Pedersen A., Pérez M., Romero J. Exploring the robustness of macrophyte-based classification methods to assess the ecological status of coastal and transitional ecosystems under the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 2013, 704:279-291.
44. Moss B. The Water Framework Directive: Total environment or political compromise?. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 400:32-41.
45. Nixon S., Bewes V., Mills D. Study of Pressures and Measures in the Major River Basin Management Plans: Comparison of Typologies. Project Report. WRc 2012.
46. Omernik J.M. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1987, 77:18-125.
47. Olin M., Holmgren K., Rask M., Allen M., Connor L., Duguid A., Duncan W., Harrison A., Hesthagen T., Kelly F., Kinnerbäck A., Rosell R., Saksgård R. Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report: Northern Lake Fish Fauna Ecological Assessment Methods 2014, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
48. Pardo I., Gómez-Rodríguez C., Wasson J.-G., Owen R., van de Bund W., Kelly M.G., Bennett C., Birk S., Buffagni A., Erba S., Mengin N., Murray-Bligh J., Ofenböck G. The European reference condition concept: a scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 420:33-42.
49. Penning E., Dudley B., Mjelde M., Hellsten S., Hanganu J., Kolada A., van den Berg M., Maemets H., Poikane S., Phillips G. Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes. Aquat. Ecol. 2008, 42(2):237-251.
50. Poikane S., Alves M., Argillier C., van den Berg M., Buzzi F., Hoehn E., de Hoyos C., Karottki I., Laplace-Treyture C., Solheim A., Ortiz-Casas J., Ott I., Phillips G., Pilke A., Pádua J., Remec-Rekar S., Riedmüller U., Schaumburg J., Serrano M., Soszka H., Tierney D., Urbanič G., Wolfram G. Defining chlorophyll-a reference conditions in European lakes. Environ. Manage. 2010, 45(6):1286-1298.
51. Poikane S., Portielje R., van den Berg M., Phillips G., Brucet S., Carvalho L., Ott I., Soszka H., Van Wichelen J. Defining ecologically relevant water quality targets for lakes in Central Europe. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 51(3):592-602.
52. Ptacnik R., Lepistö L., Willén E., Brettum P., Andersen T., Rekolainen S., Solheim A.L., Carvalho L. Quantitative responses of lake phytoplankton to eutrophication in Northern Europe. Aquat. Ecol. 2008, 42(2):227-236.
53. Quintino V., Elliott M., Rodrigues A.M. The derivation, performance and role of univariate and multivariate indicators of benthic change: Case studies at differing spatial scales. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2006, 330(1):368-382.
54. Ramos E., Juanes J.A., Galván C., Neto J.M., Melo R., Pedersen A., Scanlan C., Wilkes R., van den Bergh E., Blomqvist M., Karup H.P., Heiber W., Reitsma J.M., Ximenes M.C., Silió A., Méndez F., González B. Coastal waters classification based on physical attributes along the NE Atlantic region. An approach for rocky macroalgae potential distribution. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci. 2012, 112:105-114.
55. Sandin L., Johnson R.K. Ecoregions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages of Swedish streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2000, 19:462-474.
56. Scheffer M. Ecology of Shallow Lakes 1998, Chapman & Hall, London.
57. Stoddard J.L., Larsen D.P., Hawkins C.P., Johnson R.K., Norris R.H. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16(4):1267-1276.
58. Tett P., Gowen R.J., Painting S.J., Elliott M., Forster R., Mills D.K., Bresnan E., Capuzzo E., Fernandes T.F., Foden J., Geider R.J., Gilpin L.C., Huxham M., McQuatters-Gollop A.L., Malcolm S.J., Saux-Picart S., Platt T., Racault M.F., Sathyendranath S., van der Molen J., Wilkinson M. Framework for understanding marine ecosystem health. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 94:1-27.
59. Uriarte A., Borja A. Assessing fish quality status in transitional waters, within the European Water Framework Directive: Setting boundary classes and responding to anthropogenic pressures. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci. 2009, 82:214-224.
60. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) A Primer on Using Biological Assessments to Support Water Quality Management 2011, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
61. Yoder C.O., Barbour M.T. Critical technical elements of state bioassessment programs: a process to evaluate program rigor and comparability. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 150:31-42.
62. Van de Bund W., Poikane S., Romero J.R. Comparability of the Results of the Intercalibration Exercise - Summary of Responses and Way Forward 2008, European Commission, Document ENV-COM240108-5, Brussels, 14 pp.
63. Willby N.J. From metrics to Monet: the need for an ecologically meaningful guiding image. Aquat. Conserv. 2011, 21:601-603.
64. Zampoukas N., Piha H., Bigagli E., Hoepffner N., Hanke G., Cardoso A.C. Marine monitoring in the European Union: How to fulfill the requirements for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in an efficient and integrated way. Mar. Policy 2013, 39:349-351.
65. Zenker A., Baier B. Relevance of abiotic criteria used in German lake typology for macroinvertebrate fauna. Hydrobiologia 2009, 636:379-392.