From metrics to Monet: The need for an ecologically meaningful guiding image

Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 601-603

  Willby, Nigel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155183146     PISSN: 10527613     EISSN: 10990755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.1233     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Davies SP, Jackson SK. 2006. The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16: 1251-1266.
2. Geffroy G. 1922. Claude Monet: sa vie, son temps, son oeuvre. Editions G. Cres, Paris.
3. Haslam SM. 1978. River Plants. Cambridge University Press:Cambridge.
4. Kelly M. 2011. Drawing diatoms: the challenges of visualising the microscopic, underwater world. FBA News No. 54. Freshwater Biological Association; 14-15.
5. Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches here and there. Oxford University Press: New York.
6. Madgwick G, Emson D, Sayer CD, Willby NJ, Rose NL, Jackson MJ, Kelly A. 2011. Centennial-scale changes to the aquatic vegetation structure of a shallow eutrophic lake and implications for restoration. Freshwater Biology (DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02652.x).
7. Moss B. 2007. Shallow lakes, the Water Framework Directive and life. What should it all be about? Hydrobiologia 584: 381-394.
8. Pallis M. 1911. The river valleys of east Norfolk: their aquatic and fen formations. In Types of British Vegetation, Tansley AG (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 214-244.
9. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217.