When interdependence shapes social perception: Cooperation and competition moderate implicit gender stereotyping

Spanish Journal of Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue , 2013, Pages

  De Lemus, Soledad ^a   Bukowski, Marcin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

compensation effect; gender stereotypes; interdependence goals; social perception; stereotype content model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910040350     PISSN: 11387416     EISSN: 19882904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2013.96     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abele A., & Wojciszke B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751.
2. Bem S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 42, 155-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fh0036215.
3. Blair I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207%2FS15327957PSPR0603-8.
4. Brambilla M., Rusconi P., Sacchi S., & Cherubini P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744.
5. Bukowski M., Moya M., de Lemus S., & Szmajke A. (2009). Selective stereotype activation: The joint impact of interpersonal goals and task context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 317-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fejsp.585.
6. Caprariello P. A., Cuddy A. J. C., & Fiske S. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the stereotype content model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 147-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1368430208101053.
7. de Lemus S., Moya M., Bukowski M., & Lupianez J. (2008). Medicion de la activacion automatica de las dimensiones estereotipicas de genero mediante un paradigma de priming. [Automatic activation of competence and warmth dimensions in the case of gender stereotyping]. Psicologica, 29, 115-132.
8. de Lemus S., Spears R., Bukowski M., Moya M., & Lupianez J. (2013). Reversing implicit gender stereotype activation as a function of exposure to traditional gender roles. Social Psychology, 44, 109-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000140.
9. Devine P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.56.1.5.
10. Eagly A. H., & Mladinic A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167289154008.
11. Eckes T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47, 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1021020920715.
12. Fazio R. H., Jackson J., Dunton B., & Williams C. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.69.6.1013.
13. Fiske S. T., Cuddy A., & Glick P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.92.4.631.
14. Fiske S. T., Cuddy A., Glick P., & Xu J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and Warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.82.6.878.
15. Fiske S. T., Lin M., & Neuberg S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16. Fiske S., & Neuberg S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Judd C., James-Hawkins L., Yzerbyt V., & Kashima Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.89.6.899.
18. Kervyn N., Yzerbyt V., Judd C., & Nunes A. (2009). A question of compensation: The social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 828-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0013320.
19. Kunda Z., & Thagard P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits and behaviors: A parallelconstraint- satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0033-295X.103.2.284.
20. Lenton A. P., Sedikides C., & Bruder M. (2009). A metaanalysis on the malleability of automatic gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 183-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6402.2009.01488.x.
21. Neuberg S. L., & Fiske S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracydriven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.53.3.431.
22. Ratcliff R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.114.3.510.
23. Rudman L. A., Greenwald A. G., & McGhee D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279009.
24. Ruscher J. B., & Fiske S. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0022-3514.58.5.832.
25. Russell A. M. T., & Fiske S. T. (2008). It's all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193-1201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fejsp.539.
26. Seidenberg M. S. (1990). Lexical access: A theoretical soup stone? In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 33-71). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Skowronski J. J., & Carlston D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin 105, 131-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F%2F0033-2909.105.1.131.
28. Spencer S. J., Fein S., Wolfe C. T., Fong C., & Dunn M. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139-1152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F01461672982411001.
29. Wade M. L., & Brewer M. B. (2006). The structure of female subgroups: An exploration of ambivalent stereotypes. Sex Roles, 54, 753-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9043-x.
30. Wojciszke B. (2005). Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F10463280500229619.
31. Wojciszke B., Abele A. E., & Baryła W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973-990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.595.