Automatic activation of competence and warmth dimensions in the case of gender stereotyping;Activación automática de las dimensiones de competencia y sociabilidad en el caso de los estereotipos de género

Psicologica

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 115-132

  De Lemus, Soledad ^a,c   Moya, Miguel ^a   Bukowski, Marcin ^b   Lupiáñez, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b Universidad Jaguelónica de Cracovia

^c s n   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56549085036     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, J. R. & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. New York: Winston.
2. Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C. & Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 272-281.
3. Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. En S. Chaiken y Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York: Guilford.
4. Biernat, M. & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544-557.
5. Biernat, M. & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.
6. Biernat, M., Manis, M. & Nelson, T.F. (1991). Comparison and expectancy processes in human judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 203-211.
7. Blair, I. V. & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142-1163.
8. Brauer, M., Wasel, W. & Niedenthal, P. (2000). Implicit and explicit components of prejudice. Review of General Psychology, 4, 79-101.
9. Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
10. de Lemus, S., Moya, M. & Lupiáñez, J. (2007). Contextual contingency of "automatic" gender stereotype activation. Manuscrito en preparación.
11. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
12. Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., Bargh, J. & van Knippenberg, A. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531-544.
13. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K. & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62-68.
14. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B. & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.
15. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Expósito, F. & Moya, M. (2005). Violencia de género. En F. Expósito y M. Moya (Eds.), Aplicando la Psicología Social (pp. 201-227). Madrid: Pirámide.
17. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behaviour: the MODE model as an integrative framework. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic Press.
18. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J., Dunton, B. & Williams, C. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobstrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
19. Fazio, R. H. & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
20. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M. C. & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
21. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and Warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 6, 878-902.
22. Foddy, M., & Smithson, M. (1989). Fuzzy sets and double standards: Modeling the process of ability inference. En J. Berger, M. Zelditch, y B. Andersen (Eds.) Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations (pp. 73-99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
23. Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Sexism and other isms. Independence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. En W. B. Swann, Jr., J. H. Langlois y L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society. The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 193-222). Washington: American Psychological Association.
24. Greenwald, A. G. & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
25. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
26. Hamilton, D.L., & Sherman, S.J. (1996). Perceiving Persons and Groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
27. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. En E. T. Higgins y A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
28. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S. & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
29. Huici, C. (1984). The individual and social functions of sex role stereotypes. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 579-602). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
31. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes - A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18(1), 13-18.
32. McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B. & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends upon who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 563-579.
33. Morales, J. F. & López, M. (1993). Bases para la construcción de un sistema de indicadores sociales de estereotipia de género. Psicothema, 5, 123-132.
34. Moya, M. (2003). El análisis psicosocial del género. En J. F. Morales y C. Huici (Eds.), Estudios de psicología social (pp. 175-221). Madrid: UNED.
35. Moya, M. & Expósito, F. (2001). Nuevas formas, viejos intereses: Neosexismo en varones españoles. Psicothema, 13, 643-649.
36. Moya, M. & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2005). Cognición social aplicada. En F. Expósito y M. Moya (Eds.), Aplicando la Psicología Social (pp. 149-172). Madrid: Pirámide.
37. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
38. Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
39. Posner, M. I. & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. En R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp.55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Puertas, S. (2003). Activación automática de los estereotipos asociados al poder y su medición implícita y explícita. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Granada.
41. Pugh, M.D. & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746-762.
42. Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76-88.
43. Schneider, W., Eschman, A. & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User's Guide. Pittsburg: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
44. Shallice, T. (1972). Dual functions of consciousness. Psychological Review, 79, 383-393.
45. Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Spence, J. T. & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and Femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
47. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin y S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks / Cole.
48. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M. & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus Ça Change, Plus C'est Pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (8), 842-849.
49. Williams, J. E. & Best, D. L.(1990). Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A multination study, Newbury Park: Sage.