Practical estimate of gradient nonlinearity for implementation of apparent diffusion coefficient bias correction

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1487-1495

  Malyarenko, Dariya I ^a   Chenevert, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

Author keywords

ADC bias correction; Diffusion weighted MRI; Gradient nonlinearity scalars

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; GEOMETRY; MEASUREMENT; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHANTOM; ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84910011225     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24486     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chenevert TL, Stegman LD, Taylor JM, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:2029-2036.
2. Galban CJ, Mukherji SK, Chenevert TL, et al. A feasibility study of parametric response map analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans of head and neck cancer patients for providing early detection of therapeutic efficacy. Transl Oncol 2009;2:184-190.
3. Li SP, Padhani AR. Tumor response assessments with diffusion and perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:745-763.
4. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 2009;11:102-125.
5. Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 2011;59:477-494.
6. Lemke A, Stieltjes B, Schad LR, Laun FB. Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:766-776.
7. Riches SF, Hawtin K, Charles-Edwards EM, de Souza NM. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients. NMR Biomed 2009;22:318-325.
8. Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:534-546.
9. Sorensen AG, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, et al. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1996;199:391-401.
10. Wong EC, Cox RW, Song AW. Optimized isotropic diffusion weighting. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:139-143.
11. Malyarenko D, Galban CJ, Londy FJ, et al. Multi-system repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using an ice-water phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37:1238-1246.
12. Tan ET, Marinelli L, Slavens ZW, King KF, Hardy CJ. Improved correction for gradient nonlinearity effects in diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38:448-453.
13. Janke A, Zhao H, Cowin GJ, Galloway GJ, Doddrell DM. Use of spherical harmonic deconvolution methods to compensate for nonlinear gradient effects on MRI images. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:115-122.
14. Jovicich J, Czanner S, Greve D, et al. Reliability in multi-site structural MRI studies: effects of gradient non-linearity correction on phantom and human data. Neuroimage 2006;30:436-443.
15. Romeo F, Hoult DI. Magnet field profiling: analysis and correcting coil design. Magn Reson Med 1984;1:44-65.
16. Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y, et al. Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology 2008;249:624-630.
17. Bammer R, Markl M, Barnett A, et al. Analysis and generalized correction of the effect of spatial gradient field distortions in diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:560-569.
18. Malyarenko DI, Ross BD, Chenevert TL. Analysis and correction of gradient nonlinearity bias in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements. Magn Reson Med 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
19. Chenevert TL, Galban CJ, Ivancevic MK, et al. Diffusion coefficient measurement using a temperature-controlled fluid for quality control in multicenter studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:983-987.
20. Holz M, Heil SR, Sacco A. Temperature-dependent self-diffusion coefficients of water and six selected molecular liquids for calibration in accurate 1H NMR PFG measurements. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2000;2:4740-4742.
21. Malyarenko DI, Ross BD, Chenevert TL. Error analysis and correction of ADC measurements for gradient nonlinearity. In: Proc 20th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Melbourne; 2012; p 3550.