Imaging of the murine biliopancreatic tract at 7 Tesla: Technique and results in a model of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1355-1364

  Ernst, Thomas M ^a   Schwinge, Dorothee ^a   Raabe, Nina ^a   Daubmann, Anne ^a   Kaul, Michael G ^a   Adam, Gerhard ^a   Schramm, Christoph ^a   Ittrich, Harald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

7T; Bile duct; Cholangiography; Mouse; MRCP; PSC

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT; BREATHING RATE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FAST RECOVERY FAST SPIN ECHO; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEPATOBILIARY SYSTEM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VIVO STUDY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PANCREAS; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANIMAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUDE MOUSE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALS; BILIARY TRACT; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHOLANGITIS, SCLEROSING; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, NUDE; PANCREAS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84909994886     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24475     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1995;332:924-933.
2. Bambha K, Kim WR, Talwalkar J, et al. Incidence, clinical spectrum, and outcomes of primary sclerosing cholangitis in a United States community. Gastroenterology 2003;125:1364-1369.
3. Cullen SN, Chapman RW. The medical management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Semin Liver Dis 2006;26:52-61.
4. Silveira M, Lindor K. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. In: Monga SPS, editor. Molecular pathology of liver diseases. Vol. 5. New York: Molecular Pathology Library: Springer 2011. p 741-752.
5. Huard P, Do-Xuan-Hop D. La ponction transhepatique des canaux biliares. Bull Soc Med Chir Indoch 1937;15:1090-1100.
6. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991;181:805-808.
7. Maccioni F, Martinelli M, Al Ansari N, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: past, present and future: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2010;14:721-725.
8. Popov Y, Patsenker E, Fickert P, Trauner M, Schuppan D. Mdr2 (Abcb4)-/-mice spontaneously develop severe biliary fibrosis via massive dysregulation of pro- and antifibrogenic genes. J Hepatol 2005;43:1045-1054.
9. Fickert P, Wagner M, Marschall HU, et al. 24-norUrsodeoxycholic acid is superior to ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of sclerosing cholangitis in Mdr2 (Abcb4) knockout mice. Gastroenterology 2006;130:465-481.
10. Pollheimer MJ, Trauner M, Fickert P. Will we ever model PSC? - "it's hard to be a PSC model!". Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2011;35:792-804.
11. Fickert P, Zollner G, Fuchsbichler A, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid aggravates bile infarcts in bile duct-ligated and Mdr2 knockout mice via disruption of cholangioles. Gastroenterology 2002;123:1238-1251.
12. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique. Radiology 1995;196:459-464.
13. Onishi H, Kim T, Hori M, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients. Invest Radiol 2009;44:559-565.
14. Tabibian JH, Macura SI, O'Hara SP, et al. Micro-computed tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive, live-mouse cholangiography. Lab Invest 2013;93:733-743.
15. Gong AY, Masyuk AI, Splinter PL, Huebert RC, Tietz PS, LaRusso NF. Channel-mediated water movement across enclosed or perfused mouse intrahepatic bile duct units. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002;283:C338-C346.
16. Watanabe S, Abe K, Anbo Y, Katoh H. Changes in the mouse exocrine pancreas after pancreatic duct ligation: a qualitative and quantitative histological study. Arch Histol Cytol 1995;58:365-374.
17. Kaul MG, Adam G. qMapIt, an ImageJ-plugin, for quantitative multi-parametric analysis of DICOM images. In: Proceedings of ImageJ User and Developer Conference. 1st ed. Mondorf-les-Bains, Luxembourg, 2012. (abstract 130).
18. Ludbrook J. Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1998;25:1032-1037.
19. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428.
20. Figueiredo JL, Siegel C, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R. Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography (NIRFC) in mouse models of bile duct injury. World J Surg 2010;34:336-343.
21. Kosaka M, Owatari N, Seo Y, et al. In vivo NMR micro-imaging of kidney and liver of mouse at 9.4 T. Jpn J Physiol 2000;50:463-467.
22. Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, Zou KH, Thibodeau S, Tempany CM. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spinecho techniques. Radiology 2006;238:549-559.
23. Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of respiratory-triggered three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo with parallel imaging technique and breath-hold half-Fourier two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiat Med 2006;24:202-209.
24. Hori M, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. MRCP with a combination of respiratory-triggered 3D fast recovery fast spin-echo (FRFSE) sequence and a parallel imaging technique: a comparison with 2D single-shot fast spinecho (SSFSE) sequence (abstr). In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, Berkeley, California, USA, 2003. (abstract 1441).
25. Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics 2001;21:23-37.
26. Busse RF, Riederer SJ, Fletcher JG, Bharucha AE, Brandt KR. Interactive fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:339-348.
27. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Ishimori T, et al. Diagnostic pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of the biliary tract and gallbladder. Radiographics 1999;19:415-429.