Keep your friends close and your facebook friends Closer: A multiplex network approach to the analysis of offline and online social Ties

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 206-215

  Hristova, Desislava ^a   Musolesi, Mirco ^b   Mascolo, Cecilia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); COMPUTER AIDED NETWORK ANALYSIS; HOUSING; MULTIPLEXING; STUDENTS;

AMOUNT OF INTERACTION; COLLEGE STUDENTS; HIGH HOMOGENEITY; MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS; MULTIPLEX NETWORKS; PROFILE SIMILARITIES; RESIDENTIAL SECTORS; SOCIAL-TIE STRENGTHS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84909960955     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Aiello, L. M.; Barrat, A.; Schifanella, R.; Cattuto, C.; Markines, B.; and Menczer, F. 2012. Friendship Prediction and Homophily in Social Media. ACM Trans. Web 6(2):9:1-9:33.
2. Backstrom, L.; Bakshy, E.; Kleinberg, J.; Lento, T.; and Rosen, I. 2011. Center of Attention: How Facebook Users Allocate Attention Across Friends. In In Proceedings of ICWSM11.
3. Bakshy, E.; Rosenn, I.; Marlow, C.; and Adamic, L. 2012. The Role of Social Networks in Information Diffusion. In Proceedings of WWW12, 519-528. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
4. Burke, M., and Kraut, R. 2013. Using Facebook after Losing a Job: Differential Benefits of Strong and Weak Ties. Proceedings of CSCW13.
5. Burke, M., and Kraut, R. 2014. Growing Closer on Facebook: Changes in Tie Strength Through Site Use. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing (CHI).
6. Cardillo, A.; Zanin, M.; Gomez-Gardenes, J.; Romance, M.; Garcia del Amo, A. J.; and Boccaletti, S. 2013. Modeling the multi-layer nature of the European Air Transport Network: Resilience and passengers re-scheduling under random failures. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 215(1):23-33.
7. Dong, W.; Lepri, B.; and Pentland, A. 2011. Modelling the Coevolution of Behaviours and Social Relationships Using Mobile Phone Data. In Proceedings of MUM11, 134-143.
8. Dunbar, R. I. M. 2011. How many friends can you really have? IEEE Spectrum 81-83.
9. Eagle, N.; Macy, M.; and Claxton, R. 2010. Network Diversity and Economic Development. Science 328(5981):1029-1031.
10. Fischer, C. S. 1982. To dwell among friends : personal networks in town and city. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
11. Granovetter, M. 1983. The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. Sociological Theory 1:pp. 201-233.
12. Gray, R.; Vitak, J.; Ellison, N.; and Easton, E. 2013. Examining Social Adjustment to College in the Age of Social Media: Factors Influencing Successful Transitions and Persistence. Computers and Education 67(0):193-207.
13. Haythornthwaite, C., and Wellman, B. 1998. Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(12):1101-1114.
14. Haythornthwaite, C. 2005. Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society 8(2):125-147.
15. Kivelä, M.; Arenas, A.; Barthelemy, M.; Gleeson, J. P.; Moreno, Y.; and Porter, M. A. 2013. Multilayer Networks. arXiv:1309.7233.
16. Lampe, C.; Vitak, J.; and Ellison, N. 2013. Users and Nonusers: Interactions Between Levels of Adoption and Social Capital. In Proceedings of CSCW13, 809-820. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
17. Macskassy, S. A., and Michelson, M. 2011. Why do people retweet? Anti-homophily wins the day! In Proceedings of ICWSM11.
18. Madan, A.; Farrahi, K.; Gatica-Perez, D.; and Pentland, A. 2011. Pervasive Sensing to Model Political Opinions in Faceto- face Networks. In Proceedings of Pervasive11, 214-231.
19. Madan, A.; Cebrian, M.; Moturu, S.; Farrahi, K.; and Pentland, A. 2012. Sensing the Health State of a Community. Pervasive Computing 11(4):36-45.
20. Mark, N. 1998. Birds of a Feather Sing Together. Social Forces 77(2):pp. 453-485.
21. McPherson, M.; Smith-Lovin, L.; and Cook, J. M. 2001. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27:215-444.
22. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. Mixing Patterns in Networks. Phys. Rev. E 67:026126.
23. Papadopoulos, F.; Kitsak, M.; Serrano, M.; Bogu, M.; and Krioukov, D. 2012. Popularity Versus Similarity in Growing Networks. Nature 489:537-540.
24. Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.
25. Plato. 1968. Plato in Twelve Volumes. Number v. 11 in Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.
26. Steinfield, C.; DiMicco, J. M.; Ellison, N. B.; and Lampe, C. 2009. Bowling Online: Social Networking and Social Capital within the Organization. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 245-254. ACM.
27. Szell, M.; Lambiotte, R.; and Thurner, S. 2010. Multirelational Organization of Large-scale Social Networks in an Online World. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(31):13636-13641.
28. Vitak, J. 2012. The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56(4):451-470.
29. Vitak, J. 2014. Facebook Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Relationship Maintenance Strategies Among Geographically Dispersed and Communication-Restricted Connections. In CSCW, 842-853.
30. Wellman, B.; Haase, A. Q.; Witte, J.; and Hampton, K. 2001. Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? Social Networks, Participation, and Community Commitment. American Behavioral Scientist 45(3):436-455.