Experimental analysis of the mechanical behavior of the viscoelastic porcine pancreas and preliminary case study on the human pancreas

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 41, Issue , 2015, Pages 199-207

  Wex, C ^a   Frohlich M ^a   Brandstadter K ^a   Bruns, C ^a   Stoll, A ^a  

^a University Clinic Magdeburg   (Germany)

Author keywords

Pancreas Transplantation; Pancreatitis; Shear Rheology; Soft tissue mechanics

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; PANCREATITIS; SHEAR RHEOLOGY; SOFT TISSUE MECHANICS;

COLLAGEN;

ALCOHOLIC PANCREATITIS; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; EX VIVO STUDY; FLOW KINETICS; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER; NONHUMAN; PANCREAS; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; SHEAR RATE; SHEAR STRESS; SWINE; VISCOELASTICITY; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; MATERIALS TESTING; ORGAN SIZE; PIG; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VISCOSITY;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; LIVER; MATERIALS TESTING; ORGAN SIZE; PANCREAS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SWINE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84909960133     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arcidiacono P.G. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 8(1):48-67.
2. Bipat S., SSKS Phoa, van Delden O.M., Bossuyt P.M.M., Gouma D.J., Laméris J.S., Ultrasonography Stoker, J. computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. J. Comput. Assisted Tomography 2005, 29:438-445.
3. Brown J.D., In-vivo and postmortem biomechanics of abdominal organs under compressive loads: Experimental approach in a laparoscopic surgery setup. PhD 2003, (Thesis), University of Washington.
4. Campbell F., Verbeke C.S. Pathology of the Pancreas: A Practical Approach 2013, Springer Science & Business.
5. Chatelin S., Oudry J., Périchon N., Sandrin L., Allemann P., Soler L., et al. In vivo liver tissue mechanical properties by transient elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis. Biorheology 2011, 48:75-88.
6. Chaudhary V., Bano S. Imaging of the pancreas: Recent advances. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 15(Suppl1):S25.
7. Evans A., Whelehan P., Thomson K., McLean D., Brauer K., Purdie C., et al. Invasive breast cancer: Relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology 2012, 263(3):673-677.
8. Georges P.C., Hui J.J., Gombos Z., McCormick M.E., Wang A.Y., Uemura M., et al. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: implications for fibrosis. Am. J. Phy. Gastrointest. Liver Phy. 2007, 293:G1147-G1154.
9. Giovannini M., Botelberge T., Bories E., Pesenti C., Caillol F., Esterni B., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J. G. 2009, 15(13):1587.
10. Greenleaf J.F., Fatemi M., Insana M. Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2003, 5:57-78.
11. Gruessner R.W., Kendall D.M., Drangstveit M.B., Gruessner A.C., Sutherland D.E. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from live donors. Ann. Surg. 1997, 226:471-482.
12. Hrapko M., van Dommelen J.A.W., Peters G.W.M. Wismans JSHM. The influence of test conditions on characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue. J. Biomech. Eng. 2008, 130:031003-1-10.
13. Humar A., Kandaswamy R., Granger D., Gruessner R.W., Gruessner A.C. Sutherland DER. decreased surgical risks of pancreas transplantation in the modern era. Ann. Surg. 2000, 231:269-275.
14. Iglesias-Garcia J., Larino-Noia J., Abdulkader I., Forteza J., Dominguez-Munoz J.E. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology 2010, 139:1172-1180.
15. Janssen J., Schlörer E., Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007, 65:971-978.
16. Janssen J., Schlörer E., Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007, 65:971-978.
17. Kerdok A.E. Characterizing the nonlinear mechanical response of liver to surgical manipulation. PhD 2006, (Thesis), Harvard University.
18. Liu Z., Bilston L. On the viscoelastic character of liver tissue: experiments and modelling of the linear behaviour. Biorheology 2000, 37:191-201.
19. Mezger T.G. The Rheology handbook: for users of rotational and oscillatory rheometers. Vincentz Network GmbH & Co, KG 2006.
20. Nicolle S., Noguer L., Palierne J.F. Shear mechanical properties of the porcine pancreas: Experiment and analytical modelling. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 26:90-97.
21. O'Toole D., Palazzo L., Arotçarena R., Dancour A., Aubert A., Hammel P., et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2001, 53:470-474.
22. Ophir J., Alam S.K., Garra B.S., Kallel F., Konofagou E.E., Krouskop T., et al. Elastography: imaging the elastic properties of soft tissues with ultrasound. J. Med. Ultrasonics 2002, 29:155-171.
23. Phan-Thien N., Nasseri S., Bilston L.E. Oscillatory squeezing flow of a biological material. Rheol. Acta 2000, 39:409-417.
24. Rouviere O., Yin M., Dresner M.A., Rossman P.J., Burgart L.J., Fidler J.L., et al. MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results 1. Radiology 2006, 240:440-448.
25. Schrader H., Wiese M., Ellrichmann M., Belyaev O., Uhl W., Tannapfel A., et al. Diagnostic value of quantitative EUS elastography for malignant pancreatic tumors: relationship with pancreatic fibrosis. Ultraschall Med.-Eur. J. Ultrasound 2012, 33:E196-E201.
26. Shi Y., Glaser K.J., Venkatesh S.K. Ben-Abraham EI, Ehman RL. Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers. J. Magn. Reson. Imag 2014.
27. Suda K. Pancreas: Pathological Practice and Research. Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers, Basel, Switzerland 2007.
28. Venstrom J.M., McBride M.A., Rother K.I., Hirshberg B., Orchard T.J., Harlan D.M. Survival after pancreas transplantation in patients with diabetes and preserved kidney function. Jama 2003, 290:2817-2823.
29. Vito R.P., MacManus R.K., Bradley E. The mechanics of pancreatic pseudocyst. J. Biomech. 1981, 14:215-220.
30. Voss M., Hammel P., Molas G., Palazzo L., Dancour A., O[U+05F3]Toole D., et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut 2000, 46(2):244-249.
31. Wallace M.B., Hawes R.H. Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2001, 23:26-35.
32. Wex C., Stoll A., Fröhlich M., Arndt S., Lippert H. How preservation time changes the linear viscoelastic properties of porcine liver. Biorheology 2013, 50:115-131.
33. Wex C., Stoll A., Fröhlich M., Arndt S., Lippert H. Mechanics of fresh, frozen-thawed and heated porcine liver tissue. Int. J. Hyperther. 2014, 30(4):271-283.
34. Yin M., Venkatesh S.K., Grimm R.C., Rossman P.J., Manduca A., Ehman R.L. Assessment of the pancreas with MR elastography. P. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 2627.
35. Yin M., Chen J., Glaser KJ., Talwalkar.JA., Ehman RL. Abdominal MR elastography. Top. Mag. Reson. Imag. 2009, 20:79.
36. Ziol M., Handra-Luca A., Kettaneh A., Christidis C., Mal F., Kazemi F., et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis. C Hepatol. 2005, 41:48-54.