The variability in likelihood ratios due to different mechanisms

Forensic Science International: Genetics

Volumn 14, Issue , 2015, Pages 187-190

  Bright, Jo Anne ^a,b   Stevenson, Kate E ^a   Curran, James M ^b   Buckleton, John S ^a  

^a MT ALBERT RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

DNA; Forensic; Interpretation; Likelihood ratio; MCMC; STRmix

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; INJECTION; MALE; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO TECHNIQUE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION GENETICS; PROBABILITY; GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DNA; FORENSIC GENETICS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MONTE CARLO METHOD;

EID: 84909960016     PISSN: 18724973     EISSN: 18780326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. J.M. Butler Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology 2012 Academic Press San Diego
2. P.S. Walsh, N.J. Fildes, and R. Reynolds Sequence analysis and characterization of stutter products at the tetranucleotide repeat locus vWA Nucleic Acids Res. 24 1996 2807 2812
3. I.E. Dror, and G. Hampikian Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation Sci. Justice 51 4 2011 204 208
4. L. Geddes Fallible DNA evidence can mean prison or freedom N. Sci. 207 2773 2010 8 11
5. D.R. Paoletti Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures J. Forensic Sci. 50 2005 1361 1366
6. J.M. Curran, and J. Buckleton Uncertainty in the number of contributors for the European Standard Set of loci Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 11 1 2014 205 206
7. Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM) SWGDAM Interpretation Guidelines for Autosomal STR Typing by Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories 2010 Available from: http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/html/codis-swgdam.pdf
8. N. Morling Interpretation of DNA mixtures-European consensus on principles Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 1 3-4 2007 291 292
9. A. Haelser Issues in gathering, interpreting and delivering DNA evidence Expert Evidence Conference, Canberra 2011
10. J.-A. Bright Developing allelic and stutter peak height models for a continuous method of DNA interpretation Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 7 2 2013 296 304
11. J.-A. Bright Degradation of forensic DNA profiles Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 45 4 2013 445 449
12. D. Taylor, J.-A. Bright, and J. Buckleton The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 7 5 2013 516 528
13. L. Prieto Euroforgen-NoE collaborative exercise on LRmix to demonstrate standardization of the interpretation of complex DNA profiles Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 9 2014 47 54
14. D.J. Balding, and R.A. Nichols DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands Forensic Sci. Int. 64 1994 125 140
15. D. Taylor Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 11 2014 144 153
16. D. Taylor An illustration of the effect of various sources of uncertainty on DNA likelihood ratio calculations Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 11 2014 56 63
17. C. Brookes Characterising stutter in forensic STR multiplexes Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 6 1 2012 58 63