Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour

Forensic Science International: Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 144-153

  Taylor, Duncan ^a,b  

^a FORENSIC SCIENCE SA   (Australia)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assumed contributors; DNA profile interpretation; Likelihood ratio; Mixtures; Reliability; STRmix

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA TEMPLATE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; LIKELIHOOD RATIO; MATHEMATICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; FORENSIC GENETICS; GENETICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DNA; FORENSIC GENETICS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS;

EID: 84898624410     PISSN: 18724973     EISSN: 18780326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. D.V. Lindley Understanding Uncertainty 2006 John Wiley & Sons Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey
2. D. Taylor, J.-A. Bright, and J. Buckleton The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 7 2013 516 528
3. J.-A. Bright, D. Taylor, J.M. Curran, and J.S. Buckleton Developing allelic and stutter peak height models for a continuous method of DNA interpretation Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 7 2013 296 304
4. J.-A. Bright, D. Taylor, J.M. Curran, and J.S. Buckleton Degradation of forensic DNA profiles Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 45 4 2013 445 449
5. W.S. Cleveland Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74 1979 829 836
6. W.S. Cleveland LOWESS: a program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression Am. Stat. 35 1981 54
7. I.W. Evett, C. Buffery, G. Willott, and D.A. Stoney A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic cases J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 31 1991 41 47
8. P. Gill, J. Curran, and K. Elliot A graphical simulation model of the entire DNA proc (Pubitemid 40360993)
9. J.-A. Bright, K. McManus, S. Harbison, P. Gill, and J. Buckleton A comparison of stochastic variation in mixed and unmixed casework and synthetic samples Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 6 2012 180 184
10. J.-A. Bright, E. Huizing, L. Melia, and J. Buckleton Determination of the variables affecting mixed MiniFiler(TM) DNA profiles Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 5 2011 381 385
11. J.-A. Bright, J. Turkington, and J. Buckleton Examination of the variability in mixed DNA profile parameters for the Identifiler(TM) multiplex Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 4 2009 111 114
12. ® DNA mixture interpretation J. Forensic Sci. 56 2011 1430 1447
13. P. Gill, J.P. Whitaker, C. Flaxman, N. Brown, and J.S. Buckleton An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STR's derived from less that 100 pg of DNA Forensic Sci. Int. 112 2000 17 40 (Pubitemid 30406944)
14. J.-A. Bright, P. Gill, and J. Buckleton Composite profiles in DNA analysis Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 6 2012 317 321
15. B.S. Weir Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles J. Forensic Sci. 49 2004 1009 1014 (Pubitemid 39166699)
16. T. Tvedebrink, P.S. Eriksen, J.M. Curran, H.S. Mogensen, and N. Morling Analysis of matches and partial-matches in a Danish STR data set Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 6 2012 387 392
17. J.-A. Bright, D. Taylor, J. Curran, and J. Buckleton Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 9 2014 102 110