Atlas-based under-segmentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8673 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2014, Pages 315-322

  Wachinger, Christian ^a,b   Golland, Polina ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ATLAS-BASED SEGMENTATION; ERROR MEASURES; GENERATIVE MODEL; OVER SEGMENTATION; SEGMENTATION ACCURACY;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MEDICAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84909636919     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Arthur, D., Vassilvitskii, S.: k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In: ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 1027-1035 (2007)
2. Chang, J., Fisher III, J.W.: Parallel sampling of dp mixture models using subclusters splits. In: Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 620-628 (2013)
3. Dice, L.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3), 297-302 (1945)
4. Dubuisson, M., Jain, A.: A modified hausdorff distance for object matching. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 566-568 (1994)
5. Görür, D., Rasmussen, C.E.: Dirichlet process gaussian mixture models: Choice of the base distribution. Computer Science and Technology 25(4), 653-664 (2010)
6. Heckemann, R., Hajnal, J., Aljabar, P., Rueckert, D., Hammers, A.: Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. NeuroImage 33(1), 115-126 (2006)
7. Kulis, B., Jordan, M.I.: Revisiting k-means: New algorithms via bayesian nonparametrics. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 513-520 (2012)
8. Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Maurer, C., et al.: Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage 21(4), 1428-1442 (2004)
9. Sabuncu, M., Yeo, B., Van Leemput, K., Fischl, B., Golland, P.: A Generative Model for Image Segmentation Based on Label Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 29 (2010)
10. Sudderth, E.B.: Graphical Models for Visual Object Recognition and Tracking. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2006)
11. Wachinger, C., Sharp, G.C., Golland, P.: Contour-driven regression for label inference in atlas-based segmentation. In: Mori, K., Sakuma, I., Sato, Y., Barillot, C., Navab, N. (eds.) MICCAI 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8151, pp. 211-218. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
12. Wang, H., Yushkevich, P.A.: Spatial bias in multi-atlas based segmentation. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 909-916 (2012)